Titlebook: Women‘s Contemporary Readings of Medieval (and Modern) Arabic Philosophy; Saloua Chatti Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Au

OUTRE

Shīrzī and the Meta-TTheory of Logic?>Mullā ?adrā Shīrāzī and the Meta-Theory of Logictwentieth century, the Persian philosopher of the Safavid period Mullā ?adrā Shīrāzī (d. 1045/1635-6) has so far been studied for his ontology, epistemology, eschatology, political philosophy, and commentaries on the Qur?an and Tradition. One area of his work that has not been studied as much is log

INERT

橫截,橫斷

Some Observations on Prudence (gr. φρ?νησι?, ar. ,) in Book VI of Averroes’ Middle Commentary on theCommentary on Book VI of the .. As Averroes’ Commentary is now lost in its original Arabic version (apart from some thirty fragments preserved in the margins of the Unicum of Fez), we offer here for the first time a critical edition (from the two main Latin witnesses . et .) of the passages of Book

兇殘

Ethics and Aesthetics: Theorizing Simile in Ibn Sīnā’s , and reted through their philosophical keys provided by subsequent commentaries, have thus far been the near sole focus of scholarly attention. With attention paid to the organic connection between the text’s form and content, this chapter alternatively examines the introductory similes employed in Ibn S

hazard

Toward Another Understanding of the Notion of , in the Avicennian Ontology of the Rational Soulnna’s philosophy, focusing mainly on the question of the innateness of prime propositions, such as “the whole is greater than the part”. This study proposes to consider the . in the light of Avicenna’s ontology of the rational soul. It shows that the difficulties one encounters, when trying to deter

Organization

Primacy of Existence Versus Primacy of Essence – What Is the Debate About?nly existence fills it, whereas the primacy of essence argues that it is the diverse and distinct essences which actually ...The respective debate was initially developed in the School of Isfahan, moved to center stage and formulated as a strict dichotomy by Mīr Dāmād and later by his disciple ?adr

類人猿

“Superstition” or “Crown of Science”? Zaki Naguib Mahmoud, Youssef Karam, and Yumna Tarief El-Kholy aphysical questions were sidelined or even deem wrong altogether. The study presents and discusses three of the most important contributions to this debate in their own right and with regard to their corresponding references to one another: The debate in question started in the 1950s with neo-positi

Enliven

configuration

Toward Another Understanding of the Notion of , in the Avicennian Ontology of the Rational Souloposes to consider the . in the light of Avicenna’s ontology of the rational soul. It shows that the difficulties one encounters, when trying to determine the exact nature of the . are indicative of the irreducible tensions that run through this ontology.

LINE