Titlebook: Women Writing Fancy; Authorship and Auton Maura Smyth Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 Fancy.Women‘s Writing.

Arthr-

摸索

Threads That Go Nowhere in , and ,ble in Ariel’s self-conscious fanciful touches to Prospero’s domineering will in Shakespeare’s .. When Ariel is released at the end of the play, the “Ariel function” proceeds in Francis Bacon’s .. When Bacon invokes Shakespeare’s island in constructing his own, Bacon unwittingly imports Fancy’s pres

integral

monogamy

使迷惑

Going Undercover with Aphra Behn’s “Female Pen”for women to write. This is also the moment Fancy must go underground. By this point, the English culture has disparagingly aligned Fancy with both the frivolous world of bric-a-brac and curios and the dangerous excess of religious zeal. Although Behn disavows Fancy on the first page of ., she brill

努力趕上

極深

Afterword: Fancy and the Tinctures, Tones, and Flavors of Historyses. She marks Fancy not just as a means of composing contained, extra-rational spaces of potential female agency. Under her guidance, it also becomes a method for constructing a literary history that . such spaces, represented in her own unabashedly idiosyncratic anthology, .. Using this fanciful h

SEED

Coda: The Persistence of Fancynting her method of history-making to reconstruct a history of women’s writing. To achieve this end, feminist criticism has had to be attentive to writers and texts that the process of canon formation—under the influence of the serious, timeless Romanticist Imagination—traditionally minimized or fai

受傷

討好女人