Titlebook: Wittgenstein‘s Tractatus at 100; Martin Stokhof,Hao Tang Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licens

Encounter

書目名稱Wittgenstein‘s Tractatus at 100影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Wittgenstein‘s Tractatus at 100影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Wittgenstein‘s Tractatus at 100網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Wittgenstein‘s Tractatus at 100網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Wittgenstein‘s Tractatus at 100被引頻次




書目名稱Wittgenstein‘s Tractatus at 100被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Wittgenstein‘s Tractatus at 100年度引用




書目名稱Wittgenstein‘s Tractatus at 100年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Wittgenstein‘s Tractatus at 100讀者反饋




書目名稱Wittgenstein‘s Tractatus at 100讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

圣歌

RECUR

,Wittgenstein’s , and the Epistemology of Logic,in’s early key insight that ‘logic takes care of itself’ enables him to solve several problems that arise for Frege’s and Russell’s philosophies and epistemologies of logic. These include problems relating to the justification of logical accounts and logical consequence, as well as to the status of

我怕被刺穿

Ethics in the ,: A Condition of the Possibility of Meaning?,regards logic as a condition of the possibility of meaning, in the sense that logic makes meaningful language and thought possible. Second, I ask why Wittgenstein calls both logic and ethics ‘transcendental’. I suggest that, while logic is a condition of the possibility of semantic meaning, ethics i

declamation

ATRIA

,Metaphysics and Magic: Echoes of the , in Wittgenstein’s ‘Remarks on Frazer’, Pointing to this continuity will, I hope, bring out how the dimension of significance, central to the ‘Remarks on Frazer’, plays a role in the progress of the ., as well as elucidate how metaphysics is an expression . a distortion of the spiritual, similar to the one we find in magic and mythology.

single

The , and the Carnapian Conception of Syntax,pecifically, I will try to show that beneath what at first sight could appear to be a philosophical difference over a mundane question regarding the nature of the propositions of logic, in fact exemplified a chasm between Wittgenstein’s and Carnap’s understanding of our relation to language and the

巨頭

Maximize

,Wittgenstein’s , in Context: Modernity and its Critique,, then the centenary of the publication of . makes the examination of Wittgenstein’s early work in its broader historical context quite apposite. The present chapter aims to contribute to the relevant discussions by focusing on the relation of both the early Wittgenstein and the . to their times, as

locus-ceruleus

The , and Modernism: Dialectics, Apocalypse, and Ethics,an external tradition to which his philosophy in some way relates? What exactly is it that we mean when we speak of Wittgenstein as a modernist figure? In order to answer these questions, this chapter takes a dual approach. First, it argues that understanding Wittgenstein as a modernist figure requi