找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪(fǎng)問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Why the Boers Lost the War; Leopold Scholtz Book 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005 campaign.measure

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 36943|回復(fù): 34
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:41:36 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Why the Boers Lost the War
編輯Leopold Scholtz
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/1029/1028186/1028186.mp4
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Why the Boers Lost the War;  Leopold Scholtz Book 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005 campaign.measure
描述Why did the British win the Anglo-Boer War? Although there is truth in the simple statement that they were much stronger than the Boers, it does not explain everything. Therefore, the main focus of this book is to analyse the most important strategic and operational decisions made on both sides, and to measure them according to accepted modern military theory. It is shown that both the British and Boer war efforts were very haphazard at the beginning, but that both learnt as the war went on. In the end, the British got the Boers in a vice from which they could not escape.
出版日期Book 2005
關(guān)鍵詞campaign; measure; phase; state; truth; war; warfare
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9780230513310
isbn_softcover978-1-349-52518-8
isbn_ebook978-0-230-51331-0
copyrightPalgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Why the Boers Lost the War影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Why the Boers Lost the War影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Why the Boers Lost the War網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Why the Boers Lost the War網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Why the Boers Lost the War被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Why the Boers Lost the War被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Why the Boers Lost the War年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Why the Boers Lost the War年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Why the Boers Lost the War讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Why the Boers Lost the War讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶(hù)組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:13:08 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:02:51 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:09:26 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:15:15 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:04:14 | 只看該作者
Book 2005 to measure them according to accepted modern military theory. It is shown that both the British and Boer war efforts were very haphazard at the beginning, but that both learnt as the war went on. In the end, the British got the Boers in a vice from which they could not escape.
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:52:03 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:12:35 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:37:20 | 只看該作者
Noraini Binti Idris the own physical effort of carrying out the service or to enjoy a treatment or performance people were unable to produce for themselves. However, it was only with the soaring growth of output after the industrial revolution that consumption opportunities grossly exceeded the physical needs and the
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:13:55 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-12 06:51
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
寿阳县| 徐汇区| 桑日县| 广河县| 武穴市| 石台县| 东城区| 连州市| 金平| 福海县| 嘉祥县| 城市| 洪湖市| 三江| 库伦旗| 东台市| 通山县| 那坡县| 青铜峡市| 中方县| 长顺县| 张家川| 桐梓县| 桂平市| 临澧县| 邹城市| 蓬安县| 江津市| 淳化县| 灵川县| 和龙市| 诏安县| 大庆市| 杂多县| 乌恰县| 应城市| 永福县| 曲松县| 普陀区| 广东省| 大同市|