找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Why Plato Lost Interest in the Socratic Method; Gareth B. Matthews,S. Marc Cohen Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 自由
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 11:21:15 | 只看該作者
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 16:49:39 | 只看該作者
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 21:09:55 | 只看該作者
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 01:18:02 | 只看該作者
Gareth B. Matthews,S. Marc CohenSocratic method of questioning and refutation (elenchus) predominates the early Platonic dialogues.Early dialogues were intended to commemorate Socrates and the elenchus.Uncovering the shortcomings th
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 03:01:43 | 只看該作者
The Socratic Method, so-called Socratic elenchus. This is a species of philosophical analysis whose aim is to arrive at the definition of a problematic concept by means of subjecting alternative proposals to potential refutation by means of counterexample. Six key features of the method are delineated.
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 10:01:25 | 只看該作者
Analyzing Courage: ,, but Socrates shows them all to be defective. Their efforts end in perplexity, leading us to wonder whether the elenchus, as a form of inquiry, holds out a serious prospect of leading to the discovery of what courage is.
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 13:50:42 | 只看該作者
Blameworthy Ignorance: ,are so dismal? We might hope to find an answer in the .. There we find a possible motivation for the elenchus in a principle of “epistemic purity”—the idea that one ought not to think one knows something that, in fact, one does not know.
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 17:10:16 | 只看該作者
Virtue in Socratic Ignorance: , will ever be entirely satisfactory? The . may provide an answer, for it raises the possibility that the virtue that is the topic of this dialogue, . (self-mastery), may actually turn out to be the limited wisdom that Socrates claims to have, namely, self-knowledge.
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 20:47:13 | 只看該作者
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 00:36:02 | 只看該作者
Conclusion,re are both internal and external limitations in what the elenchus can be reasonably expected to accomplish. And Plato also thought that philosophy can do more to get beyond those limitations. Only by going beyond the elenctic method will we be able to adequately address the foundational questions of philosophy.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-5 22:36
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
南汇区| 锡林浩特市| 双流县| 高密市| 赫章县| 乌鲁木齐县| 蒲江县| 佛坪县| 阜康市| 仲巴县| 库车县| 习水县| 鹤山市| 桐城市| 屏东市| 渝中区| 永定县| 和平区| 延长县| 新丰县| 顺平县| 犍为县| 肥西县| 白朗县| 上饶县| 琼中| 新蔡县| 明星| 松滋市| 万源市| 甘泉县| 子长县| 湟源县| 大余县| 于都县| 锡林浩特市| 永顺县| 会理县| 墨竹工卡县| 康马县| 磐安县|