找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Why Neo-Liberalism Failed in France; Political Sociology Kevin Brookes Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under ex

[復制鏈接]
查看: 18499|回復: 37
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:10:04 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Why Neo-Liberalism Failed in France
副標題Political Sociology
編輯Kevin Brookes
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/1029/1028154/1028154.mp4
概述Retraces the history of the Mont Pelerin Society and how they came to champion economic liberalism.Considers the spread of these neoliberal ideas in France as compared with other European countries.Pr
叢書名稱Palgrave Studies in Classical Liberalism
圖書封面Titlebook: Why Neo-Liberalism Failed in France; Political Sociology  Kevin Brookes Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under ex
描述.This book fills a gap in the literature on economic liberalism in France as it?strives to resolve a paradox. How do we reconcile the fact that while France has been among the most fertile of soils for the liberal intellectual tradition, the theoretical ideas it has produced has little impact on its own public debate and public policies? .Using a wide range of data on public policies, it demonstrates that neo-liberal thought has had far less influence in France than in other European nations during the period from 1974 to 2012. The failure of neo-liberalism to propagate in public policies France is shown to be mainly due to the strong resistance of public opinion towards it. In addition, the structure of French institutions has reinforced the effect of "path dependence" in the making of public policy by valuing state expertise above that of actors likely to question the post-war consensus, such as academics and think tanks. Finally, the book identifies other more incidental factors which contributed to neo-liberalism marginality: the fragmentation and radicalism of neo-liberal advocates, as well as the absence of charismatic political actors to effectively embody these ideas.. .Thi
出版日期Book 2021
關鍵詞Economic Liberalism; Classical Liberalism; Market economies; French public policy; Neoliberalism; Mont Pe
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82188-3
isbn_softcover978-3-030-82190-6
isbn_ebook978-3-030-82188-3Series ISSN 2662-6470 Series E-ISSN 2662-6489
issn_series 2662-6470
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Why Neo-Liberalism Failed in France影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Why Neo-Liberalism Failed in France影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Why Neo-Liberalism Failed in France網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Why Neo-Liberalism Failed in France網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Why Neo-Liberalism Failed in France被引頻次




書目名稱Why Neo-Liberalism Failed in France被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Why Neo-Liberalism Failed in France年度引用




書目名稱Why Neo-Liberalism Failed in France年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Why Neo-Liberalism Failed in France讀者反饋




書目名稱Why Neo-Liberalism Failed in France讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:18:29 | 只看該作者
,Conclusion: Why It Didn’t Happen Here,ontexts. France has been an interesting case study insofar as it possesses a history comprising both prolific generation of liberal economic theory . domination of the central state in the formulation of public policy. This book has been an attempt to unravel this paradox.
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:09:31 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:44:30 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:50:40 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:01:14 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:38:04 | 只看該作者
,“A Spring Without a Summer”: The Political Failure of Neoliberalism (1984–2012),mitted to neoliberalism to make themselves heard within the partisan framework. In addition to the structural characteristics of the French political system, there were also situational elements that acted as obstacles to the spread of neoliberal ideas. Our analysis, based on primary sources (archiv
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:30:32 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:58:54 | 只看該作者
Book 2021France has been among the most fertile of soils for the liberal intellectual tradition, the theoretical ideas it has produced has little impact on its own public debate and public policies? .Using a wide range of data on public policies, it demonstrates that neo-liberal thought has had far less infl
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:41:16 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-11 15:02
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
喀喇沁旗| 娄烦县| 资阳市| 凤山市| 鲁山县| 陆河县| 德格县| 华宁县| 泰安市| 马公市| 阜南县| 双流县| 桦川县| 岳普湖县| 红安县| 长治市| 定日县| 沙洋县| 山东省| 金沙县| 互助| 鹤峰县| 天柱县| 隆化县| 田东县| 兴海县| 二连浩特市| 常山县| 宁阳县| 青田县| 沈丘县| 绵竹市| 吴旗县| 裕民县| 工布江达县| 浮山县| 沧州市| 同德县| 南澳县| 浮山县| 潞城市|