找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Why Fiscal Stimulus Programs Fail, Volume 2; Statistical Tests Co John J. Heim Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), u

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 47882|回復(fù): 49
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:35:27 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Why Fiscal Stimulus Programs Fail, Volume 2
副標題Statistical Tests Co
編輯John J. Heim
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/1029/1028133/1028133.mp4
概述Tests the assertion that accommodative monetary policy can eliminate the "crowd out" problem" in fiscal stimulus programs.Provides the largest scale scientific test on fiscal stimulus programs, with a
圖書封面Titlebook: Why Fiscal Stimulus Programs Fail, Volume 2; Statistical Tests Co John J. Heim Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), u
描述This book scientifically tests the assertion that accommodative monetary policy can eliminate the “crowd out” problem, allowing fiscal stimulus programs (such as tax cuts or increased government spending) to stimulate the economy as intended. It also tests to see if natural growth in th economy can cure the crowd out problem as well or better. The book is intended to be the largest scale scientific test ever performed on this topic. It includes about 800 separate statistical tests on the U.S. economy testing different parts or all of the period 1960 – 2010. These tests focus on whether accommodative monetary policy, which increases the pool of loanable resources, can offset the crowd out problem as well as natural growth in the economy. The book, employing the best scientific methods available to economists for this type of problem, concludes accommodate monetary policy .could. have, but until the quantitative easing program, Federal Reserve efforts to accommodate fiscal stimulusprograms were not large enough to offset more than 23% to 44% of any one year’s crowd out problem. That provides the science part of the answer as to why accommodative monetary policy didn’t accommodate: to
出版日期Book 2021
關(guān)鍵詞Keynes; US Macroeconomic Policy; Fiscal Stimulus; Accomodative Monetary Policy; Monetary Policy; Quantita
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64727-8
isbn_softcover978-3-030-64729-2
isbn_ebook978-3-030-64727-8
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Why Fiscal Stimulus Programs Fail, Volume 2影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Why Fiscal Stimulus Programs Fail, Volume 2影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Why Fiscal Stimulus Programs Fail, Volume 2網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Why Fiscal Stimulus Programs Fail, Volume 2網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Why Fiscal Stimulus Programs Fail, Volume 2被引頻次




書目名稱Why Fiscal Stimulus Programs Fail, Volume 2被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Why Fiscal Stimulus Programs Fail, Volume 2年度引用




書目名稱Why Fiscal Stimulus Programs Fail, Volume 2年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Why Fiscal Stimulus Programs Fail, Volume 2讀者反饋




書目名稱Why Fiscal Stimulus Programs Fail, Volume 2讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:06:47 | 只看該作者
The Role of Primary Dealers, Investment Banks and Foreign Banks in Federal Reserve Efforts to Changempares the effectiveness of securities purchases from investment banks with that of commercial and savings banks to determine which is more effective in stimulating the economy and concludes commercial and savings banks are more effective. Purchases from foreign banks are also found to be less effective.
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:53:34 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:19:50 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:28:33 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:33:19 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:30:46 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:57:09 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:46:09 | 只看該作者
Theory of Crowd Out and Accommodative Monetary PolicyThis chapter develops a mathematical theoretical model of how crowd out negatively affects consumer and business spending, and how increases in loanable funds can offset crowd out. The theory is also presented in literary form.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:45:07 | 只看該作者
Does M1 More Accurately Define the Extent to Which Crowd Out Can Be Modified Than Total Loanable FunThis chapter examines the effect of M1 and both endogenous and exogenous loanable funds availability on GDP an concludes FR purchases have the stronger positive effect.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-8 04:53
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
临潭县| 北票市| 张北县| 辽宁省| 紫阳县| 万源市| 木兰县| 临城县| 余干县| 南溪县| 玉树县| 葫芦岛市| 芜湖县| 嘉禾县| 西宁市| 美姑县| 喀什市| 星子县| 休宁县| 瓦房店市| 延安市| 忻城县| 平谷区| 汉中市| 上高县| 安平县| 新平| 喜德县| 阿克苏市| 尼木县| 永嘉县| 布拖县| 凉城县| 自贡市| 乌鲁木齐市| 梁河县| 安义县| 郧西县| 彩票| 睢宁县| 普安县|