Titlebook: Weak Institutions and the Governance Dilemma; Gaps as Traps Mariella Falkenhain Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s),

Goiter

書目名稱Weak Institutions and the Governance Dilemma影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Weak Institutions and the Governance Dilemma影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Weak Institutions and the Governance Dilemma網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Weak Institutions and the Governance Dilemma網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Weak Institutions and the Governance Dilemma被引頻次




書目名稱Weak Institutions and the Governance Dilemma被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Weak Institutions and the Governance Dilemma年度引用




書目名稱Weak Institutions and the Governance Dilemma年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Weak Institutions and the Governance Dilemma讀者反饋




書目名稱Weak Institutions and the Governance Dilemma讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

人類學(xué)家

Pessary

Canyon

FLIRT

Theorizing Gaps in Hybrid Regimes,t, policy capacity in government, and informal institutions influence the extent and nature of gaps. After differentiating between two possible modes of gaps, the chapter discusses potential implications of gaps for governments and NGOs across regimes. It ends with an inventory of gaps based on ontological, analytical and substantive differences.

食料

Social Protection in Georgia: NGOs in a Field of Low Political Salience,n increasingly failed to remedy the gap from below. The second part of the chapter turns to NGOs as gap agents. It highlights their efforts to activate informal care and the challenges they faced in advocating for systemic change.

landfill

ADORN

Theorizing Gaps in Hybrid Regimes,t, policy capacity in government, and informal institutions influence the extent and nature of gaps. After differentiating between two possible modes of gaps, the chapter discusses potential implications of gaps for governments and NGOs across regimes. It ends with an inventory of gaps based on ontological, analytical and substantive differences.

多余

Social Protection in Georgia: NGOs in a Field of Low Political Salience,n increasingly failed to remedy the gap from below. The second part of the chapter turns to NGOs as gap agents. It highlights their efforts to activate informal care and the challenges they faced in advocating for systemic change.

DAUNT