Titlebook: War, Peace and the Military; Sociological Perspec Franz Kernic Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive l

Customary

金哥占卜者

樹膠

,Democracy and the Military—Updating the Incompatibility Theorem,itique of the theorem as articulated, above all, within political science and political sociology. This line of argument within the social sciences can be understood as a theory of ‘interdependence’ between the military and society.

CRP743

The Issue of Acceptance and Legitimacy of Modern Armed Forces,ry in modern democratic societies. During the second half of the twentieth century, societal and social science discourse focused heavily upon questions relating to the need for, or the necessary scale of, national armed forces and their justification and contributions in times of peace.

惡意

War, Peace and Military Violence: A Phenomenological Inquiry, and the evidence of war, it provides a philosophical analysis of the phenomenon of war and the relationship between war and being in Western philosophy and investigates the possibility for a new foundation of peace in our world and society.

簡略

哪有黃油

Social Sciences and the Military: Preliminary Remarks, already been internalized in the structure and methods of modern social sciences before they even proceed—from an allegedly neutral position—to an analysis of their subject, the military institution and the use of military force. In addition, it takes a closer look at the development and self-image

circuit

Modern Society and the Military: Early Sociological Approaches,y and social action. The sociological theories of August Comte, Herbert Spencer and Max Weber are worth looking at in greater detail as they provide examples of how the relationship between the military and society was conceptualized in early sociology. This chapter focuses upon the military-oriente

adulterant

Political Economy and Military Organization,l rationality of military power. Thus, modern political economic theory developed its own view of military force, the main aspects of which are outlined in this chapter. Some of the ideas that surface here are certainly familiar to modern political thought: security as a product of military power, p

朋黨派系

,Democracy and the Military—Updating the Incompatibility Theorem,detail. It starts with an examination of the incompatibility theorem in its new form, before proceeding to an analysis of the modern social science critique of the theorem as articulated, above all, within political science and political sociology. This line of argument within the social sciences ca