Titlebook: Walter Hallstein: The Forgotten European?; Wilfried Loth (Professor of Modern History),Willia Book 1998 Institut für Europ?ische Politik 1

燒瓶

Walter Hallstein After the Presidencyesident Charles de Gaulle demanded his removal from office, against the determined and common opposition of governments in The Hague, Brussels, Luxembourg and Rome. This opposition did not receive sufficient encouragement from Bonn.. Hallstein refused a compromise which would have entailed him stayi

flourish

保守黨

Walter Hallstein: the British Perspectivegures in the shaping of West European integration. Partly for that reason, he received less attention in the English-language press at the time, and in the subsequent histories and analyses of European integration which flowed from British and American publishers. It was the ‘Hallstein Doctrine’ — w

diskitis

MONY

Walter Hallstein and the Anglo-Saxon WorldHallstein is remembered as the man of the European credo, whose devotion to the European idea was his life’s work. Unwaveringly pursuing the goal of a European federation founded on law and reason until the end of his days, Hallstein indeed attended and helped shape the process of integration from t

heterodox

CLASH

NADIR

Walter Hallstein: the French Perspectiveno uniform German or British perspective. Opinions are no less diverse than elsewhere with regard to such a prominent individual, as the German State Secretary and President of the Commission for many years doubtless was. However, a range of different basic aspects can be detected in the assessment

RAGE

Walter Hallstein’s Contribution to Integration Theory: Outdated or Underestimated? the value and quality of his intellectual work. As a rule, political scientists and academics simply ignore Hallstein’s contribution to the debate on integration theory at the beginning of the 1990s. If his contribution is mentioned, then it is linked to two headwords which allow Hallstein’s statem

攝取

Walter Hallstein’s Contribution to Integration Theory: Outdated or Underestimated? the value and quality of his intellectual work. As a rule, political scientists and academics simply ignore Hallstein’s contribution to the debate on integration theory at the beginning of the 1990s. If his contribution is mentioned, then it is linked to two headwords which allow Hallstein’s statem