找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Wage and Well-being; Toward Sustainable L Stuart C. Carr Book 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 working poverty.shared prosperity.de

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: bankrupt
51#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 08:32:06 | 只看該作者
Wagesychological research is a prime example, but Humanitarian work psychology has been shifting the focus. Economic Necessity matters, and what people need POST-Covid, more than ever, is not just courses on self-esteem or resilience but an overhaul of how we understand the materiality of wage and its implications for human wellbeing.
52#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 15:28:27 | 只看該作者
53#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 20:06:53 | 只看該作者
54#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 00:10:47 | 只看該作者
55#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 04:45:25 | 只看該作者
56#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 07:40:30 | 只看該作者
Living Wagetion: Is there a global living wage, in purchasing power parity dollars, that enables people, organisations and communities to prosper and thrive? This question is not as outlandish as it might first seem. Open systems often have dynamic cusps, so why not for living wages?
57#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 13:07:19 | 只看該作者
Living Wagetion: Is there a global living wage, in purchasing power parity dollars, that enables people, organisations and communities to prosper and thrive? This question is not as outlandish as it might first seem. Open systems often have dynamic cusps, so why not for living wages?
58#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 14:20:22 | 只看該作者
Maximum Wageliness of fixing a ratio is that wage $s at the top can only go higher if they bring wages at the bottom with them, i.e., raising the ceiling requires raising the floor, bringing social wellbeing with it. Perhaps the most sustainable ratio would yoke CEO wage to a living wage, one that was acceptable to all stakeholders in any organisation.
59#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 20:06:39 | 只看該作者
Maximum Wageliness of fixing a ratio is that wage $s at the top can only go higher if they bring wages at the bottom with them, i.e., raising the ceiling requires raising the floor, bringing social wellbeing with it. Perhaps the most sustainable ratio would yoke CEO wage to a living wage, one that was acceptable to all stakeholders in any organisation.
60#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 22:44:50 | 只看該作者
Sexist Wagejobs stubbornly strain the wage-wellbeing relationship for women. Effective and promising remedies for shifting sexist mindsets are . primarily ‘psychological,’ or psychologised. Instead, they include organisational levers like quotas for (i) vertical wage equality, and living wage policies for (ii) horizontal wage equality.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-19 23:02
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
烟台市| 福清市| 樟树市| 额济纳旗| 晋州市| 奎屯市| 红桥区| 旬邑县| 仁寿县| 长岛县| 墨竹工卡县| 成武县| 锦屏县| 伊金霍洛旗| 延津县| 海城市| 长顺县| 莱西市| 镇雄县| 辽中县| 洞头县| 芦山县| 光泽县| 昆明市| 雷波县| 阳曲县| 屏南县| 红河县| 正蓝旗| 全南县| 桑日县| 灵寿县| 曲周县| 隆德县| 运城市| 抚松县| 新乡县| 如东县| 淮安市| 华安县| 济源市|