找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: WTO Security Exceptions in Practice and Scholarship; Curtailing “Trump Ca Erich Vranes Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Auth

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Filament
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 11:35:01 | 只看該作者
,Methodological Aspects: Curtailing “Trump Cards” Through Good Faith and Proportionality?,w the review under the Chapeaux of the WTO security exceptions, in particular the good faith standard, is to be operationalized. This chapter argues that the principle of good faith should be concretized, for reasons of international law and legal methodology, by a proportionality analysis, which en
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 16:13:47 | 只看該作者
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 21:53:00 | 只看該作者
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 22:28:11 | 只看該作者
,(Geo-)Political Background: From Interdependence to “Permanent Exceptionalism”?,nternational) tribunals and national politics. Furthermore, they tend to become increasingly more relevant in attempts to justify “strategic” trade measures in today’s struggles for global predominance. Moreover, the concept of “national security” has been expanded in state practice to cover additio
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 03:21:09 | 只看該作者
The Security Exceptions in the GATT and TRIPS as Interpreted and Applied,also sheds light on how the analogous security exception in the GATS may be dealt with in future disputes. A closer look at these reports reveals important clarifications in, but also considerable divergences between, these seminal decisions.
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 09:34:35 | 只看該作者
,Methodological Aspects: Curtailing “Trump Cards” Through Good Faith and Proportionality?,w the review under the Chapeaux of the WTO security exceptions, in particular the good faith standard, is to be operationalized. This chapter argues that the principle of good faith should be concretized, for reasons of international law and legal methodology, by a proportionality analysis, which en
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 10:39:46 | 只看該作者
Concluding Remarks,ular that the security exceptions of the GATT, GATS and TRIPS Agreements, which have been regarded as the “boxes of Pandora” of WTO law, have largely been kept closed due to the approaches taken in the seminal panel reports discussed in this study.
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 16:01:59 | 只看該作者
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 21:03:13 | 只看該作者
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 23:50:05 | 只看該作者
SpringerBriefs in Lawhttp://image.papertrans.cn/w/image/1020083.jpg
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-10 00:46
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
斗六市| 通辽市| 盘锦市| 泰来县| 全椒县| 泸溪县| 鄂托克旗| 奎屯市| 富平县| 灌南县| 土默特左旗| 高州市| 定安县| 南澳县| 抚松县| 西藏| 米易县| 重庆市| 樟树市| 大同县| 甘洛县| 许昌市| 安国市| 昭平县| 南皮县| 安岳县| 都江堰市| 景泰县| 沁阳市| 乐陵市| 柏乡县| 会同县| 延川县| 特克斯县| 安义县| 南宁市| 正安县| 渝中区| 黄梅县| 得荣县| 金沙县|