Titlebook: 50 Years World Heritage Convention: Shared Responsibility – Conflict & Reconciliation; Marie-Theres Albert,Roland Bernecker,Matthias Ripp

satisficer

書目名稱50 Years World Heritage Convention: Shared Responsibility – Conflict & Reconciliation影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱50 Years World Heritage Convention: Shared Responsibility – Conflict & Reconciliation影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱50 Years World Heritage Convention: Shared Responsibility – Conflict & Reconciliation網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱50 Years World Heritage Convention: Shared Responsibility – Conflict & Reconciliation網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱50 Years World Heritage Convention: Shared Responsibility – Conflict & Reconciliation被引頻次




書目名稱50 Years World Heritage Convention: Shared Responsibility – Conflict & Reconciliation被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱50 Years World Heritage Convention: Shared Responsibility – Conflict & Reconciliation年度引用




書目名稱50 Years World Heritage Convention: Shared Responsibility – Conflict & Reconciliation年度引用學科排名




書目名稱50 Years World Heritage Convention: Shared Responsibility – Conflict & Reconciliation讀者反饋




書目名稱50 Years World Heritage Convention: Shared Responsibility – Conflict & Reconciliation讀者反饋學科排名

有權威

,Bilanzierung – Aufgaben und L?sungen,d Heritage programme can be regarded as a great success. Based on the principle of equality of all cultures and societies, it combines the protection of the world’s cultural and natural heritage; regardless of state borders, the preservation of these unique properties should be secured by internatio

通知

tooth-decay

Blatant

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16710-3 almost 200 countries and has a complex governance system with actors on every level. While these actors are critical to the protection and conservation of World Heritage Sites, very limited research is available that assesses their role and the importance of governmental and managerial structures o

純樸

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16710-3l governance and on how its evolution is affecting the implementation of the World Heritage Convention. Webber Ndoro reflects upon the distinction between local and global forms of governance, considering an African perspective on the colonial bias of World Heritage. Christina Cameron emphasizes the

樂意

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16710-3safe cities where people meet and innovations are created. There is a great need to change to a climate-smart society with people at the centre. Urban cultural heritage is also constantly changing; however, the World Heritage Convention and its tools take their starting points in the preservation of

Instinctive

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16710-3ools in a constantly transforming urban environment, contributing to a more sustainable urban development. For this aim, three of the author’s previous case studies of temporary uses in the city of Berlin are reconsidered from the perspective of heritage conservation through everyday practices and c

是比賽

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16821-6oducing many stresses that both physically damage sites and affect local communities through gentrification and other socio-economic changes. Festivals, events and cultural mega-events are often framed with a focus on growing tourism, but they can also provide unique opportunities to align heritage

LAP

On the way to the cyber physical car (CPC),f urban heritage and how these have been exacerbated by an over-simplified construction and commodification of heritage in the official discourse. The chapter reflects on issues and contentions about the definition of urban heritage and the prevailing focus on listing sites and monumental values, hi