Titlebook: 100 British Crime Writers; Esme Miskimmin Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer N

司法權

書目名稱100 British Crime Writers影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱100 British Crime Writers影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱100 British Crime Writers網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱100 British Crime Writers網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱100 British Crime Writers被引頻次




書目名稱100 British Crime Writers被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱100 British Crime Writers年度引用




書目名稱100 British Crime Writers年度引用學科排名




書目名稱100 British Crime Writers讀者反饋




書目名稱100 British Crime Writers讀者反饋學科排名

煞費苦心

statecraft and the nexus between spirituality and world poli.Qualifying post-Westphalian sovereign statehood as a ‘power’ as argued for in Hendrik Berkhoff’s political theology, this book addresses the decades-long theological-spiritual debate between Christian realism and Christian pacifism in U.S.

Cacophonous

antidote

Wilkie Collins (1824–1889), 1860: red from these activities. All PoS systems process over 195 billion electronic transactions with a volume of over US $28.8 trillion per year. In 2014, there were 79,790 cybersecurity incidents reported affecting PoS. There exists a pressing need to understand the cost-benefit for cybersecurity risk

Reverie

Vulnerable

Mary Elizabeth Braddon (1835–1915), 1862: thought and in critical and cultural theory more broadly. It provides a critique of this emphasis on the repressive aspects of discipline highlighting its enabling potential and role in the development of dispositions to learning. The book engages with the work of a range of theorists: Foucault, Bou

Strength

Arthur Conan Doyle (1859–1930), 1887: pitalist system and an international political system based on the territorial nation-state system (e.g., Held and McGrew 1999, 2002; Scholte 2000). This tension is based on the fact that global economic processes often demand borders that are relatively open, enabling a less restrictive movement of

植物群

Bouquet

C. L. Pirkis (1839–1910), 1893: First Publication of the ‘Loveday Brooke’ Stories in he ground of modernism? On exhausting grammatical and philosophical explanations, Friedman turns to a series of reflexive questions that allow her to probe ‘issues of power and the institutionalization of knowledge in the definitional project itself’ (Chapter 1 , 24–25). Yet while her essay successf

blister