Titlebook: Oscar Wilde‘s Society Plays; Michael Y. Bennett Book 2015 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2015 Oscar Wilde.Society P

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 03:46:56

“Would You Kindly Inform Me Who I Am?”: Wilde’s Comedies of Manners as Tragedieso comes to mind most readily. Wilde’s advocacy of, and martyrdom for, “the love that dare not speak its name”; the homosocial dialogic structure of his critical essays in .; the quasipedagogical homoerotics of .; and the career-spanning preoccupation with form all suggest an affinity with Plato and

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 08:45:21

“You Will Call Me Sister, Will You Not?”: Friendship, Solidarity, and Conflict between Women in Wild She explores how the play’s representation of alternative kinship ties that are not shackled to biology—or the Oedipal triangle—can offer possibilities for thinking beyond the logic of patriarchal, heteronormative constructions of gender and sexuality. However, while she notes briefly that the endi

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 13:17:39

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 17:33:59

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 20:22:16

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 00:21:00

Deconstructive Strategies in Wilde’s Social Comedies: From Melodrama to Deconstruction” criticism as a form of “creative” writing, the body and its pleasures pitted against a pharisaical ideology: in these and several other ways, Oscar Wilde looms up for us more and more as the Irish Roland Barthes.

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 04:35:03

The Tragicomedies of Oscar Wilde: A Wilde Response to Melodramaeriod during which Freedman wrote his essay. While Freedman sees Wilde’s plays in a similar vein as the tragicomedy of the 1950s–1960s, I want to suggest, instead, a slightly different generic classification for Wilde’s version of tragicomedy: ..

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 11:21:01

Steven Price fortwirkender Bedeutung sind, erweist sich der Blick auf die charakteristischen Unterschiede zwischen ihnen für das Verst?ndnis des Politikbegriffs als h?chst aufschlussreich. Angesichts der seit der Mitte der neunziger Jahre des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts pr?genden ?ffentlichen Debatte über die Ver?

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 14:01:49

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 20:36:56

		自動(dòng)登錄	找回密碼
密碼			To register

關(guān)于派博傳思			派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站			友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹	公司地理位置	論文服務(wù)流程	影響因子官網(wǎng)	吾愛論文網(wǎng)	大講堂	北京大學(xué)	Oxford Uni.	Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革	期刊點(diǎn)評(píng)	投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié)	SCIENCEGARD	IMPACTFACTOR	派博系數(shù)	清華大學(xué)	Yale Uni.	Stanford Uni.
\|Archiver\|手機(jī)版\|小黑屋\| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-5 18:32
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved