作者: 提煉 時間: 2025-3-21 22:44
Introduction,construct’ concept and the ripple effects of its introduction into the psychological literature from the late 1940s to early 1950s. The chapter also provides a description of important discrepancies in the published literature concerning both the ‘construct’ concept and the utility of CVT as a valid作者: 絕食 時間: 2025-3-22 02:29 作者: Hamper 時間: 2025-3-22 08:01 作者: faction 時間: 2025-3-22 10:41 作者: Immunoglobulin 時間: 2025-3-22 16:07 作者: 過份好問 時間: 2025-3-22 19:03
The Philosophical Backdrop of Construct Validityportant developments in the philosophy of science from the mid-1920s to the early 1960s. Emphasis is placed on the distinction between logical positivism and scientific realism and on key areas of difference between them. Also described is the transition between the heavily empiricist doctrines of l作者: 拘留 時間: 2025-3-22 23:36 作者: 多嘴 時間: 2025-3-23 03:10
Some Conceptual Housecleaningluding the ever-evasive ‘construct’ concept and its progenitor, the ‘hypothetical construct.’ The various ontological stances that have been adopted regarding constructs are summarized. Concrete examples of confusing or otherwise ambiguous uses of these terms are given, and a common but pernicious t作者: glans-penis 時間: 2025-3-23 07:39
Construct Validation: View from the “Trenches”1990s to current. The chapter then shifts in focus from scholarship . how to validate constructs to a description of construct validation research . lived and practiced. The major findings from a fairly recent body of empirical research dedicated to the examination of psychometric reporting and vali作者: Anticlimax 時間: 2025-3-23 09:59
Revisiting Possibilities for Construct Validity Theorys and empirical evidence bearing on validation practices of researchers. The central theses of CVT presented earlier are revisited and reframed in light of contemporary validation theory and standards of practice. Guidelines and recommendations are given for both the uses of CVT-related concepts and作者: 慢跑 時間: 2025-3-23 16:19 作者: 漫不經(jīng)心 時間: 2025-3-23 19:01 作者: 手工藝品 時間: 2025-3-23 23:58 作者: 胰臟 時間: 2025-3-24 03:57
Construct Validity: Developments and DebatesCVT as reflected in the first two revisions of what is today known as the . (the “.”) are summarized. Finally, respective post–1955 works of Lee Crobach and Paul Meeh are examined in order to see how the originators, themselves, extended or altered their initial description of the framework.作者: Deduct 時間: 2025-3-24 06:49 作者: 貴族 時間: 2025-3-24 13:39
The Philosophical Backdrop of Construct Validityogical positivism and the more moderate logical empiricism that grew out of the earlier philosophy. It is argued that this transition period in the philosophy of science influenced to a great extent the early developments of CVT. Important links are drawn between the work of Herbert Feigl and other logical empiricists and the core theses of CVT.作者: Mangle 時間: 2025-3-24 14:53
Philosophical Sketches of Construct Validity Theoryances regarding constructs and construct validation of the two most celebrated creators of CVT. The chapter concludes with an exploration of a number of possible explanations for the inconsistencies that appear in the literature with respect to how the philosophical roots of CVT have been characterized.作者: 忍耐 時間: 2025-3-24 22:24 作者: VAN 時間: 2025-3-25 01:35 作者: 按時間順序 時間: 2025-3-25 03:27 作者: 懦夫 時間: 2025-3-25 08:22
Historical Precursors and Early Testing Theoryes with a discussion of how classical conceptions of validity and approaches to validation came under increasing scrutiny as a dramatic re-conceptualization of the concept of ‘validity’ began to emerge toward the mid-twentieth century.作者: 宇宙你 時間: 2025-3-25 13:33 作者: 消散 時間: 2025-3-25 17:09
the History of Philosophy, has done more than anything else to prejudice his own reputation. At first sight, what we seem to have here is little more than the contrast between the tested accomplishments of the founding father of modern science, and the random remarks of a confused and somewhat disg作者: 托運 時間: 2025-3-25 20:12
Kathleen Slaneyearly influence, for example, was William Godwin, in particular his teleology of perfectibility that encourages a rationalistic approach to history, which helped Shelley formulate his youthful political hopes and aspirations in a clearly defined political discourse. Godwin’s gradualism — his commitm作者: CLOT 時間: 2025-3-26 00:50
opinion relative to its initial assumption of some form or content. The procedure and topic of philosophy, however, are themselves philosophical issues that must be decided within and by philosophy itself. Philosophy therefore finds itself in the radical predicament of having to begin instead witho作者: Asymptomatic 時間: 2025-3-26 05:21 作者: 博識 時間: 2025-3-26 12:30
Kathleen Slaneyegel share a common recognition of the significance of the social world for the development of individuals. Second, they both outline political communities that are held to be able to organise social life so as to overcome the alienation and disharmony that they see as common and persistent problems作者: BUMP 時間: 2025-3-26 14:01
Kathleen Slaneycharacterize Hegel’s genesis of the Judeo-Christian consciousness in ... With this overall view of the triumph of the Christian “slave morality” Nietzsche would quite likely agree.. But for the two thinkers the meaning and consequences of this “reversal” could hardly be more different. For Nietzsche作者: 雪崩 時間: 2025-3-26 19:52
Kathleen Slaneywe all of a sudden light upon a section entitled ‘The Estrangement between Science and Philosophy’.. Prior to this, the reader has been taken through the properties of the refraction and reflection and propagation of light, lenses, mirrors, rays of light, angles of incidence, image formation, and so作者: Stable-Angina 時間: 2025-3-27 00:46 作者: 壯觀的游行 時間: 2025-3-27 01:25
Kathleen SlaneyDuke’s service. Hegel received his basic education at the local grammar school and then went on to study philosophy and theology at Tübingen, where the poet H?lderlin and the precocious philosopher Schelling were his closest friends. The institution they attended was a seminary for intending pastors作者: 諄諄教誨 時間: 2025-3-27 08:58
Kathleen Slaneyalectic, the recourse to Hegel only affirms his growing importance today for at least two reasons. In the first instance, Hegel’s appraisal of scientific knowledge and his reflections upon the principle of historical relation clearly challenge in particular the positivist’s belief in the primacy of 作者: bronchiole 時間: 2025-3-27 11:15
Vermutung, dass die Weise, wie über soziale Fragen gedacht wird, nicht trivial ist. Ideen und intellektuelle Traditionen formen und beeinflussen unsere Wahrnehmung (epistemischer Aspekt) sowie unsere Bewertung (normativer Aspekt) der Realit?t. Das Thema der Sozialstaatlichkeit veranschaulicht die R作者: 獎牌 時間: 2025-3-27 13:48
pretation erkennen. In den frühen Interpretationen übertr?gt H., noch nicht seinen eigenen Standpunkt der Betrachtung in die Bewu?tseinshaltung der Shakespeareindividuen. So ist die Bewu?tseinssph?re des Macbeth die des ?b?sen Gewissens“.). Ihr entgegengesetzt ist das ?vers?hnte Gewissen“ — eine Ref作者: interlude 時間: 2025-3-27 19:29 作者: ASSAY 時間: 2025-3-27 23:27
Palgrave Studies in the Theory and History of Psychologyhttp://image.papertrans.cn/v/image/980261.jpg作者: 動機 時間: 2025-3-28 05:24
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-38523-9Construct Validity Theory; Classical Test Theory; Modern Test Theory; Loevinger; Spearman; Philosophy of 作者: 高爾夫 時間: 2025-3-28 08:01 作者: Amnesty 時間: 2025-3-28 12:42 作者: 謊言 時間: 2025-3-28 17:59
Kathleen Slaneywhereas Godwin viewed agency as fundamentally rational and free (i.e. as capable of rationally determined choices). A further influence on Shelley was the British empirical tradition, culminating in Humean scepticism, which further called Shelley’s faith in metaphysical systems into question. These 作者: Gratulate 時間: 2025-3-28 19:56
vereign autonomy. Philosophy must be what it exclusively determines itself to be, and what that is cannot be duly manifest until the conclusion of its self-constituting activity. This is not to say that philosophical investigation is limited to thinking itself. Rather, to the degree that philosophy 作者: 宣傳 時間: 2025-3-29 00:11
Kathleen Slaneyifferences which are very salient for followers or for commentators, interested in developmental stages and influences, fade into insignificance. In treating Hegel in this way, I am treating him much as he treated his historical predecessors. Thus in a passage from the . that I was teaching from rec作者: 蝕刻術(shù) 時間: 2025-3-29 03:59 作者: 起波瀾 時間: 2025-3-29 07:23
Kathleen Slaneyting is the representation of reason (.), the certainty of consciousness that it is “all reality.” . From this moment forward, consciousness discovers the world “as its own new and real world” . in which it goes forth to plant its flag “on the heights and in the depths.” .作者: Noctambulant 時間: 2025-3-29 14:23 作者: 鑒賞家 時間: 2025-3-29 17:19
