標題: Titlebook: Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice; Klaus Petrus Book 2010 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2010 comm [打印本頁] 作者: quick-relievers 時間: 2025-3-21 17:22
書目名稱Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice網絡公開度
書目名稱Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice網絡公開度學科排名
書目名稱Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice被引頻次
書目名稱Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice年度引用
書目名稱Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice讀者反饋
書目名稱Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice讀者反饋學科排名
作者: Filibuster 時間: 2025-3-21 20:27
Paul Grice and the Philosophy of Ordinary Language,nitial enthusiasm, growing uneasiness and distance, but continued loyalty. Along with John L. Austin and Peter F. Strawson, Grice is one of the philosophers now most readily associated with the Oxford-based movement. Indeed his theory of conversation is widely regarded, among linguists at least, as 作者: 教義 時間: 2025-3-22 04:08
,Intuition, the Paradigm Case Argument, and the Two Dogmas of Kant’otelianism,hilosophy, was one in which H. Paul Grice and Sir Peter Strawson defended the analytic/synthetic distinction against Morton White’s and Quine’s arguments against it (in 1956, in 1950, and in 1951 respectively). I shall specifically examine Grice and Strawson’s Paradigm Case Argument in support of th作者: otic-capsule 時間: 2025-3-22 06:32
Grice on Presupposition,mplicature’ that discusses some issues related to presupposition.. In this essay, henceforth referred to as P&CI, Grice is concerned with the debate between Russell and Strawson as to whether the implications of existence and uniqueness associated with the use of definite descriptions in sentences o作者: 微生物 時間: 2025-3-22 11:37 作者: Flawless 時間: 2025-3-22 13:41
A Gricean View on Intrusive Implicatures,ch are apparently generated by subordinate clauses, or which fall under the scope of a logical operator (typically both). Such cases, for reasons to be detailed below, pose a challenge to Grice’s account. While those who have posed the challenge, ranging from advocates of truth-conditional pragmatic作者: Popcorn 時間: 2025-3-22 17:35
Speaker-Meaning, Conversational Implicature and Calculability,eaning Exhaustiveness’. And yet, as I have argued elsewhere (Saul 2002) this seems to be in clear conflict with Grice’s famous three-clause characterization of conversational implicature (1989: 30–1), which is also widely accepted. Legitimate worries can be raised, however, about the correct interpr作者: 制定 時間: 2025-3-22 21:46 作者: 欺騙世家 時間: 2025-3-23 01:48 作者: narcissism 時間: 2025-3-23 07:12 作者: 注射器 時間: 2025-3-23 13:13 作者: 和藹 時間: 2025-3-23 17:44
The Total Content of What a Speaker Means, basis for semantics, where semantics is understood to be the study of linguistic meaning, that is, the study of what words and sentences mean. Rather than ‘basis’, perhaps, meaning. should be said to be the ground upon which the foundation of linguistic meaning rests, because meaning. is broader th作者: modifier 時間: 2025-3-23 18:10 作者: 過時 時間: 2025-3-23 22:57
Contextualism in the Philosophy of Language,e characterization accepted by all those who claim (or are said) to be contextualists. To a very rough first approximation, one may characterize the contextualist as someone who is sympathetic to pragmatically oriented, usage-based approaches to meaning. She will take sides with Robyn Carston when s作者: NEG 時間: 2025-3-24 04:36 作者: 形容詞 時間: 2025-3-24 08:35 作者: 逢迎春日 時間: 2025-3-24 10:54
Siobhan Chapmanthe topics discussed at the workshop “W-Optimum Design and Related Statistical Issues” that took place in Juan-les-Pins, France, in May 2005. The title of the workshop was chosen as a light-hearted celebration of the work of Henry Wynn. It was supported by the Laboratoire I3S (CNRS/Universit′ e de N作者: Working-Memory 時間: 2025-3-24 18:09
Jay David Atlasnd them without a computerized telescope or even setting circles. The photographs show how the objects appear through a 127mm Maksutov (and other instruments, where applicable). The visual appearance of a Messier object is often very different from what can be imaged with the same telescope, and a s作者: FLOAT 時間: 2025-3-24 21:15 作者: molest 時間: 2025-3-25 02:43 作者: Initial 時間: 2025-3-25 04:43
Mandy Simonsnd them without a computerized telescope or even setting circles. The photographs show how the objects appear through a 127mm Maksutov (and other instruments, where applicable). The visual appearance of a Messier object is often very different from what can be imaged with the same telescope, and a s作者: euphoria 時間: 2025-3-25 07:34
Jennifer Saulnd them without a computerized telescope or even setting circles. The photographs show how the objects appear through a 127mm Maksutov (and other instruments, where applicable). The visual appearance of a Messier object is often very different from what can be imaged with the same telescope, and a s作者: GILD 時間: 2025-3-25 14:23
Judith Bakernd them without a computerized telescope or even setting circles. The photographs show how the objects appear through a 127mm Maksutov (and other instruments, where applicable). The visual appearance of a Messier object is often very different from what can be imaged with the same telescope, and a s作者: Ancillary 時間: 2025-3-25 19:27
Mitchell Greennd them without a computerized telescope or even setting circles. The photographs show how the objects appear through a 127mm Maksutov (and other instruments, where applicable). The visual appearance of a Messier object is often very different from what can be imaged with the same telescope, and a s作者: Instrumental 時間: 2025-3-25 21:45 作者: 人充滿活力 時間: 2025-3-26 01:49
Christian PlunzeAuthor recommends affordable equipment.Photographs show the .Observing the Messier Objects with a Small Telescope contains descriptions and photographs of the 103 Messier objects, with instructions on how to find them without a computerized telescope or even setting circles. The photographs show how作者: 終止 時間: 2025-3-26 04:44 作者: gospel 時間: 2025-3-26 09:52 作者: Canary 時間: 2025-3-26 14:27 作者: GOAD 時間: 2025-3-26 20:12 作者: 侵略 時間: 2025-3-27 00:21
d has largely addressed the workplace, researchers are beginning to take an interest in the home environment too. Here, we address the domestic realm, focusing on the design of complex, interactive information systems. As such, our work sits in the design science version rather than behavioral scien作者: 音樂學者 時間: 2025-3-27 04:48 作者: 是貪求 時間: 2025-3-27 07:57 作者: Metastasis 時間: 2025-3-27 11:46 作者: GLUT 時間: 2025-3-27 17:26 作者: 健忘癥 時間: 2025-3-27 18:19
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230282117communication; language; Paul Grice; philosophy of language; pragmatics; semantic; semantics作者: BAIT 時間: 2025-3-27 22:49
Introduction: Paul Grice, Philosopher of Language, But More Than That,anguage. With only two papers — ‘Meaning’ (1957) and ‘Logic and conversation’ (1967) — he made it into every serious textbook dealing with the philosophy of language, linguistics, communication, or cognitive sciences.作者: Barrister 時間: 2025-3-28 03:18
2946-2576 aning, communicative actions, conversational implicatures, the semantics-pragmatics distinction and recent debates concerning minimalist versus contextualist semantics.978-1-349-36773-3978-0-230-28211-7Series ISSN 2946-2576 Series E-ISSN 2946-2584 作者: Coronary 時間: 2025-3-28 09:15
WJ-40: Issues in the Investigation of Implicature,Without actually employing the term ‘pragmatics’, Paul Grice laid out the map for modern pragmatic theory in his William James lectures of 1967 by setting out:作者: geometrician 時間: 2025-3-28 12:23
Paul Grice and the Philosophy of Ordinary Language,there is another side to the story. Grice himself had reservations about OLP and increasingly voiced concerns about its limitations. Much of his own philosophical work, including the theory of conversation, relies on assumptions, strategies and methodologies that contrast sharply with those of OLP.作者: 泄露 時間: 2025-3-28 16:20 作者: 充氣女 時間: 2025-3-28 20:32
Speaker-Meaning, Conversational Implicature and Calculability,ization do not apply to the Calculability Criterion. We are, then, still left with a conflict between Speaker Meaning Exhaustiveness and key Gricean claims about conversational implicature. At the end of this chapter, I explore ways of resolving this conflict.作者: 馬賽克 時間: 2025-3-29 01:22 作者: ALIAS 時間: 2025-3-29 06:09
On Three Theories of Implicature: Default Theory, Relevance Theory and Minimalism,ems. If this is right then there is a reason to look for a third alternative and in conclusion I’ll suggest that it is the approach emerging from so-called . which is best placed to accommodate Grice’s fundamental distinction between what a sentence means and what utterances of it implicate.作者: 沉默 時間: 2025-3-29 07:26 作者: enumaerate 時間: 2025-3-29 14:06
Contextualism in the Philosophy of Language,he claims that:.Her opponent, on the other hand, will advocate a formal semantic approach to meaning and insist that deriving the proposition expressed by a sentence is a purely syntactic-semantic enterprise. He will, therefore, tend to agree with Emma Borg that:作者: MINT 時間: 2025-3-29 18:49
Some Aspects of Reasons and Rationality,f them ‘Some aspects of reasons and rationality’. It looks most closely at the relation of practical reasons to rationality, and provides the basis for the ideas developed here. This chapter takes as its focus one particular claim and the arguments that support it: rationality is displayed in a wider variety of actions than those done for reasons.作者: Optometrist 時間: 2025-3-29 23:42
2946-2576 aning, communicative actions, conversational implicatures, the semantics-pragmatics distinction and recent debates concerning minimalist versus contextualist semantics.978-1-349-36773-3978-0-230-28211-7Series ISSN 2946-2576 Series E-ISSN 2946-2584 作者: 天賦 時間: 2025-3-30 00:34
,Intuition, the Paradigm Case Argument, and the Two Dogmas of Kant’otelianism,5) provide a Gricean and Chomskyan defence of the analytic/synthetic distinction. I shall also examine critically Saul Kripke’s famous ‘argument from linguistic intuition’ in defence of essential properties. It too is a form of the Paradigm Case Argument in the Gricean fashion. I shall argue that th作者: PANEL 時間: 2025-3-30 07:42
Grice on Presupposition,onian presuppositions. In the first section, I lay out Grice’s arguments for this conclusion. In the following section, I argue that all of Grice’s observations can be accommodated within a presuppositionalist framework. However, we will see that there are two rather different ways of characterizing作者: Desert 時間: 2025-3-30 12:06 作者: 赤字 時間: 2025-3-30 13:43
Speaker-Meaning and the Logic of Communicative Acts,me say that an agent X communicates (intentionally) to an addressee Y that A only if X, by her doing (like an utterance or a gesture), intends to bring it about that it is communicated to Y that A. Given this condition, a first step to define the notion of a communicative act is to define the notion
