標題: Titlebook: Losing an Empire and Finding a Role; Britain, the USA, NA Kristan Stoddart Book 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers [打印本頁] 作者: TINGE 時間: 2025-3-21 17:29
書目名稱Losing an Empire and Finding a Role影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Losing an Empire and Finding a Role影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Losing an Empire and Finding a Role網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Losing an Empire and Finding a Role網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名
書目名稱Losing an Empire and Finding a Role被引頻次
書目名稱Losing an Empire and Finding a Role被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Losing an Empire and Finding a Role年度引用
書目名稱Losing an Empire and Finding a Role年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Losing an Empire and Finding a Role讀者反饋
書目名稱Losing an Empire and Finding a Role讀者反饋學科排名
作者: Visual-Field 時間: 2025-3-21 23:27 作者: larder 時間: 2025-3-22 02:30 作者: figurine 時間: 2025-3-22 08:14 作者: Inculcate 時間: 2025-3-22 11:22 作者: 扔掉掐死你 時間: 2025-3-22 14:26 作者: Ambiguous 時間: 2025-3-22 17:39 作者: PHON 時間: 2025-3-22 21:37 作者: MOAT 時間: 2025-3-23 04:26 作者: 一瞥 時間: 2025-3-23 05:52
,The Labour Government: The Inheritance of Polaris and Anglo-US Nuclear Relations, 1964–1966,69. It will then move on to discuss the state of the programme when Labour assumed office. It will detail why there was a serious question mark over the number of submarines, what discussions were taking place regarding Polaris deployment East of Suez and how these could impact upon its command and control (C.) procedures.作者: 歡笑 時間: 2025-3-23 13:22
,Britain, the United States and the Reform of NATO Strategy, 1964–1966,clear arms control measures were dim, and NATO Europe remained concerned that nuclear war could be initiated by the superpowers, with European governments marginalised both in the decision-making process and in the control of the physical hardware. These were issues to which the Labour government of Harold Wilson had immediately to address itself.作者: 機構(gòu) 時間: 2025-3-23 15:32
Nuclear Weapons and International Security since 1945http://image.papertrans.cn/l/image/588657.jpg作者: 微塵 時間: 2025-3-23 18:04 作者: mitten 時間: 2025-3-23 22:32
Book 2012This book sheds fresh light on developments in British nuclear weapons policy between October 1964, when the Labour Party came back into power under Harold Wilson following a thirteen year absence, and June 1970 when the Conservative government of Edward Heath was elected.作者: 災難 時間: 2025-3-24 03:06
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230369252government; NATO; Policy; reform; British Politics作者: 使閉塞 時間: 2025-3-24 09:04
978-1-349-33656-2Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2012作者: CLAMP 時間: 2025-3-24 10:43
Losing an Empire and Finding a Role978-0-230-36925-2Series ISSN 2947-6704 Series E-ISSN 2947-6712 作者: Geyser 時間: 2025-3-24 15:02
Introduction, Power status lingered on’ as the winds of change heralded by Prime Minster Harold Macmillan blew the British Empire into the informal Commonwealth federation.. While it is true that Britain was losing its empire, it will be argued that it was reorienting its role in the world that prioritised Europ作者: RECUR 時間: 2025-3-24 21:02 作者: 全面 時間: 2025-3-24 23:48 作者: FAWN 時間: 2025-3-25 04:46
,Britain, the United States and the Reform of NATO Strategy, 1964–1966,ld numbers elsewhere. And the survivors – as Chairman Khrushchev warned the Communist Chinese, ‘the survivors would envy the dead’. For they would inherit a world so devastated by explosions and poison and fire that today we cannot conceive of its horrors..President John F. Kennedy, ., 26 July 1963.作者: Generic-Drug 時間: 2025-3-25 11:24 作者: DOSE 時間: 2025-3-25 12:46 作者: 安定 時間: 2025-3-25 16:28 作者: Fermentation 時間: 2025-3-25 20:39
,NATO and Flexible Response, 1966–1970,s emotion) I don’t believe this was a fair test of my command capabilities..Kirk: And why not?.Saavik: Because … there was no way to win..Kirk: A no-win situation is a possibility every commander may face. Has that never occurred to you?.Saavik: … No, sir. It has not..Kirk: How we deal with death is作者: 命令變成大炮 時間: 2025-3-26 01:07
,Britain, America and Allied Tactical Nuclear Operations, 1966–1970, power. He’s killed people unnecessarily – his own troops or other troops – through mistakes, through errors of judgment. A hundred, or thousands, or tens of thousands, maybe even a hundred thousand. But, he hasn’t destroyed nations..And the conventional wisdom is don’t make the same mistake twice, 作者: 存在主義 時間: 2025-3-26 06:24 作者: intrude 時間: 2025-3-26 11:49
6樓作者: 我就不公正 時間: 2025-3-26 14:27
6樓作者: 壓碎 時間: 2025-3-26 19:59
6樓作者: 勉勵 時間: 2025-3-26 22:38
6樓作者: 完成才能戰(zhàn)勝 時間: 2025-3-27 04:39
7樓作者: Peristalsis 時間: 2025-3-27 06:49
7樓作者: 密切關(guān)系 時間: 2025-3-27 12:55
7樓作者: BOGUS 時間: 2025-3-27 14:20
7樓作者: 枕墊 時間: 2025-3-27 18:55
8樓作者: IRATE 時間: 2025-3-28 00:59
8樓作者: 緯線 時間: 2025-3-28 05:33
8樓作者: 和平 時間: 2025-3-28 07:37
8樓作者: 泛濫 時間: 2025-3-28 10:27
9樓作者: 思想流動 時間: 2025-3-28 16:46
9樓作者: Trochlea 時間: 2025-3-28 20:05
9樓作者: 獎牌 時間: 2025-3-29 02:00
9樓作者: 惰性氣體 時間: 2025-3-29 05:18
10樓作者: vasculitis 時間: 2025-3-29 11:06
10樓作者: legitimate 時間: 2025-3-29 12:32
10樓作者: ADORE 時間: 2025-3-29 15:48
10樓
