標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Knowing the Structure of Nature; Essays on Realism an Stathis Psillos Book 2009 Stathis Psillos 2009 metaphysics.philosophy of science.scie [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: 無法修復(fù) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 16:41
書目名稱Knowing the Structure of Nature影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Knowing the Structure of Nature影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Knowing the Structure of Nature網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Knowing the Structure of Nature網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Knowing the Structure of Nature被引頻次
書目名稱Knowing the Structure of Nature被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Knowing the Structure of Nature年度引用
書目名稱Knowing the Structure of Nature年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Knowing the Structure of Nature讀者反饋
書目名稱Knowing the Structure of Nature讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: febrile 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 21:27
Book 2009In this sequel to the highly acclaimed Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth , Psillos discusses recent developments in scientific realism and explores realist theses and commitments. He examines the structuralist turn in the philosophy of science and offers a framework within which inference to the best explanation can be defended.作者: 豎琴 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 03:22
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234666metaphysics; philosophy of science; science; truth作者: 羅盤 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 06:56
http://image.papertrans.cn/k/image/543817.jpg作者: 點(diǎn)燃 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 11:21 作者: affinity 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 15:29
Simply the Best: A Case for Abductionive Induction (EI) and the Method of Hypothesis, I will try to show that abduction, suitably understood as inference to the best explanation (IBE), offers the best description of scientific method and solves the foregoing problem in the best way: it strikes the best balance between ampliation and epistemic warrant.作者: squander 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 18:19
Thinking About the Ultimate Argument for Realism authors of the argument, however, did not put an extra stress on . predictions, which, as Musgrave (1988) makes plain, is the litmus test for the ability of any approach to science to explain the success of science.作者: 中古 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 23:52 作者: MUT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 01:49 作者: NEG 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 08:17 作者: 乳白光 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 10:42 作者: vitreous-humor 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 17:49 作者: sinoatrial-node 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 18:41
Structure, the , Structure and Nothing , the Structure?S) is still quite an amorphous, though suggestive, position. The slogan is: ‘a(chǎn)ll that there ., is structure’ (da Costa and French 2003, 189). But then there are different claims of varying strengths. Here are some of them.作者: incarcerate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 01:18 作者: anthesis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 03:15
Scientific Realism and Metaphysics see it as a view about the world. Some philosophers, most typically from Australia, think that the second way is . correct way. Scientific realism, they argue, is a metaphysical thesis: it asserts the reality of some types of entity, most typically unobservable entities. I agree that scientific rea作者: 無政府主義者 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 07:50
Thinking About the Ultimate Argument for Realism argument is Putnam’s (1975, 73): realism ‘is the only philosophy of science that does not make the success of science a miracle’. Hence, the code name ‘no-miracles’ argument (henceforth, NMA). The NMA has quite a history and a variety of formulations. I have documented all this in my work (Psillos 作者: boisterous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 14:11
Against Neo-Instrumentalismmay be a mistake to try to identify ‘a(chǎn) crucial difference’ between instrumentalism and realism when it comes to the epistemic attitudes they recommend towards theories or theoretical assertions. There is, he says, at most ‘a(chǎn) local difference in the specific theories each is willing to believe on the作者: Externalize 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 18:48
Tracking the Real: Through Thick and Thin(e.g., observation or inference) but the processes Azzouni recommends should meet his ‘tracking requirement’: they should be ‘sensitive to the objects . we claim to be establishing (the truths we are committed to)’ (Azzouni 2004, 371–2). Azzouni (2004; 1997) claims that the tracking requirement is m作者: 刺耳 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 23:03 作者: Detoxification 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 01:36
Is Structural Realism Possible? because it asserts the existence of a mind-independent world, and it is . because what is knowable of the world is said to be its structure only. As a slogan, the thesis is that knowledge can reach only up to the structural features of the world. This chapter unravels and criticises the metaphysica作者: Senescent 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 04:52
Structure, the , Structure and Nothing , the Structure?es and claiming that they are best understood as families of models) to an ontic position (concerning what there is and claiming that structure is all there is). In between, there is an epistemic view: there is more to the world than structure, but of this more nothing but its structure can be known作者: 難管 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 11:33
Ramsey’s first published in 1931, in a collection of Ramsey’s papers edited by Richard Braithwaite. . was mostly ignored until the 1950s, though Ramsey’s reputation was growing fast, especially in relation to his work in the foundations of mathematics. Braithwaite made . use of it in his . appeared in 1953.作者: 弄污 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 12:17
Simply the Best: A Case for Abductionethod, namely, that it has to satisfy two conflicting desiderata: it should be ampliative (content-increasing) and it should confer epistemic warrant on its outcomes (cf. Gower 1998; Psillos 1999). Second, and after I have examined two extreme solutions to the problem of the method, namely, Enumerat作者: Alveoli 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 17:35
Inference to the Best Explanation and Bayesianismmework for studying abduction and induction as forms of ampliative reasoning’. There is a tension, however, at the outset. Bayesian reasoning does . have rules of acceptance. On a strict Bayesian approach,. we can never detach the probability of the conclusion of a probabilistic argument, no matter 作者: Boycott 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 22:43
The Present State of the Scientific Realism Debatevastly in their approaches and in their substantive theses, they can all be seen as participating in a common project: to characterise carefully the main features of the realism debate and to offer new ways of either exploring old arguments or thinking in novel terms about the debate itself.作者: GROWL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:07 作者: lambaste 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 04:45
Inference to the Best Explanation and Bayesianism But IBE is a rule of acceptance. In its least controversial form, IBE authorises the . of a hypothesis H, on the basis that it is the best explanation of the evidence. Think of the standard IBE-based argument for the existence of middle-sized material objects. According to this, the best explanatio作者: 不再流行 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 09:05
5樓作者: CHANT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:46
5樓作者: Interdict 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 17:42
5樓作者: 廣口瓶 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 22:51
6樓作者: 啟發(fā) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 02:57
6樓作者: 調(diào)整 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 07:28
6樓作者: 依法逮捕 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 09:47
6樓作者: 你敢命令 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 15:31
7樓作者: A精確的 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 19:06
7樓作者: Crater 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 00:36
7樓作者: etidronate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 06:08
7樓作者: 鞠躬 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 08:18
8樓作者: kidney 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 12:51
8樓作者: SLING 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 17:04
8樓作者: troponins 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 18:46
8樓作者: 易受刺激 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 02:37
9樓作者: 發(fā)炎 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 04:09
9樓作者: 嬉耍 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 10:21
9樓作者: 賞心悅目 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 13:14
9樓作者: 拍下盜公款 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 19:03
10樓作者: 發(fā)酵劑 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 20:27
10樓作者: GEAR 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 02:52
10樓作者: 甜得發(fā)膩 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 04:31
10樓
