標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Justice, Democracy and Reasonable Agreement; Colin Farrelly Book 2007 Colin Farrelly 2007 basic income.constitution.cooperation.democracy. [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: Arthur 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 19:07
書目名稱Justice, Democracy and Reasonable Agreement影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Justice, Democracy and Reasonable Agreement影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Justice, Democracy and Reasonable Agreement網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Justice, Democracy and Reasonable Agreement網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Justice, Democracy and Reasonable Agreement被引頻次
書目名稱Justice, Democracy and Reasonable Agreement被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Justice, Democracy and Reasonable Agreement年度引用
書目名稱Justice, Democracy and Reasonable Agreement年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Justice, Democracy and Reasonable Agreement讀者反饋
書目名稱Justice, Democracy and Reasonable Agreement讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 鄙視讀作 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 21:15 作者: 間接 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 04:19 作者: 疏忽 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 05:55 作者: Inflamed 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:09
Book 2007Farrelly argues against the principled paradigm of ideal theory and champions instead a virtue-oriented theory of justice entitled ‘civic liberalism‘. He critically assesses the main contemporary theories of justice and tackles a number of applied topics, ranging from constitutional design and free speech to welfare reform and economic incentives.作者: circumvent 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 14:21 作者: verdict 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 20:15
Colin Farrellywork. Using the case of Turkey, the book extends the focus of European studies scholarship that analyses the adaptation of non-member states to EU policies and practices to setting a new feminist agenda in the 978-3-030-52772-3978-3-030-52770-9Series ISSN 2662-5814 Series E-ISSN 2662-5822 作者: Cacophonous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:33 作者: GRIPE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 02:49 作者: 不可磨滅 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 08:25 作者: monochromatic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:26 作者: Longitude 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:59
Colin Farrellyreference to key excerpts and trends, I demonstrate how the media oversimplified both the problem of slut-shaming and the politics of SlutWalk primarily through a visual whitewashing of solidarity, victimhood, and resistance. I argue that the media spectacle surrounding SlutWalk is premised on an un作者: orient 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 20:19
Colin Farrellyhe political but does not draw hard boundaries between them. While accepting the partition of morality and politics that took place in modernity, it refuses the standard emptying of politics from normativity along realist lines and its refilling with normativity along moralist lines, which necessari作者: chemical-peel 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 22:46
Colin Farrellyhe political but does not draw hard boundaries between them. While accepting the partition of morality and politics that took place in modernity, it refuses the standard emptying of politics from normativity along realist lines and its refilling with normativity along moralist lines, which necessari作者: 污穢 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 04:59
Colin Farrellybution is important: internal, external and structural. Care, I argue, does not fit well in any of these types. Inseparably interwoven with relational realities, care cuts across these categories and thus poses a challenge to the feasibility of equal chances. I focus on the under-analyzed issue of b作者: 滔滔不絕地講 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 06:58
Colin Farrellyresearch on Central and Eastern Europe enlargement, identifies the mechanisms that are in place, and summarises the insights gained from the case of Turkey.?The chapter concludes by highlighting that the EU is not yet a feminist but a progressive gender actor.作者: Enervate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 13:25
research on Central and Eastern Europe enlargement, identifies the mechanisms that are in place, and summarises the insights gained from the case of Turkey.?The chapter concludes by highlighting that the EU is not yet a feminist but a progressive gender actor.作者: Conserve 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 15:18 作者: 十字架 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 22:45
The Simplifying Assumptions of Rawlsian Justice,ority to a serially ordered principle of equal basic liberties (Rawls, 1971, 1996) or to treat rights as ‘side-constraints’ (Nozick, 1974) or as ‘trumps’ (Dworkin, 1978); and the latter to a stringent prioritarian principle (Rawls’s difference principle), misguided principle of rectification (Nozick作者: 智力高 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 23:25
Dualism, Incentives and the Demands of Justice,entric’ conception of justice envisioned by Rawls’s political conception of justice. So I defend Rawls in the hope that I can convince proponents of his theory that they need to appropriate a virtue-oriented account of justice (one that is at least partially comprehensive) if they hope to salvage Ra作者: GIBE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 06:56
Should the Left Embrace Left-Libertarianism?, incoherent. Left-libertarians have retorted (Vallentyne, Steiner and Otsuka, 2005) by arguing that their theory . coherent, determinate and relevant. For the most part, the central focus of these spirited debates has been on the philosophical underpinnings of left-libertarianism rather than on its 作者: 彎彎曲曲 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 09:35 作者: Bph773 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 13:11
Colin Farrellyt ethics or social and political philosophy...The volume will be of interest to feminist scholars from all disciplines, to academics who are ethicists and political philosophers as well as to graduate students..978-94-007-9057-5978-1-4020-6841-6作者: debris 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 18:41
Colin Farrellyt ethics or social and political philosophy...The volume will be of interest to feminist scholars from all disciplines, to academics who are ethicists and political philosophers as well as to graduate students..978-94-007-9057-5978-1-4020-6841-6作者: incredulity 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 00:01 作者: Optic-Disk 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 03:20 作者: neuron 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 07:03
Colin Farrellyboundaries, and limited to its own departments or program, often named women’s studies, gender studies, and/or feminist studies. While the move within the academy to formalize the study of women, gender, and feminism is an important one,. these disciplinary boundaries unfortunately have the result o作者: anaphylaxis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 11:54
Colin Farrellyessed by government and media bodies on the understanding that gender equality has been achieved and that there is no longer any reason for any form of organized feminist movement. Yet, as she argues, this equality appears to have been mysteriously achieved without real change to patriarchal structu作者: escalate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 12:47 作者: septicemia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:22
Colin Farrellyroduction of normativity by political action. Feminism, though, does not illuminate this aspect of itself because feminists tend to describe feminist political action with a moral rather than political vocabulary. Such a vocabulary succeeds in capturing just one aspect of feminism – the centering of作者: 自戀 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 23:01 作者: 歪曲道理 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 01:14
Colin Farrellyance of the non-idealizing approach, inviting the reader to .Feminist Ethics and Social and Political Philosophy: Theorizing the Non-Ideal. is a collection of feminist essays that self-consciously develop non-idealizing approaches to either ethics or social and political philosophy (or both). Charac作者: 鞭打 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 06:10
Colin Farrellyroduction of normativity by political action. Feminism, though, does not illuminate this aspect of itself because feminists tend to describe feminist political action with a moral rather than political vocabulary. Such a vocabulary succeeds in capturing just one aspect of feminism – the centering of作者: 開始沒有 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 13:32
Colin Farrellyeminists from various disciplines have developed arguments to support the redistribution of the work of care through institutional mechanisms. I discuss the limits of such distribution under the conditions of theories that do not idealize human agents as independent beings. People’s reliance on care作者: CROW 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 17:03
Colin Farrelly scrutinises the impact of the Europeanisation process on women’s development. Building on the findings of seven empirical chapters touching upon both the adoption and application of the EU’s rules, we offer a condensed summary of the extensive lack of feminist thinking and framing in the EU’s appro作者: 暫停,間歇 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 21:22
Colin Farrellystanding of the EU.Provides a moral and ethical philosophica.‘Bridging European and gender studies, this volume deserves a great welcome to the literature. It not only offers a feminist reading of Europeanisation in general, but also discusses the process of Europeanisation and de-Europeanisation of作者: 地名詞典 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:51
scrutinises the impact of the Europeanisation process on women’s development. Building on the findings of seven empirical chapters touching upon both the adoption and application of the EU’s rules, we offer a condensed summary of the extensive lack of feminist thinking and framing in the EU’s appro作者: coalition 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 05:45
The Virtues of Fair Social Cooperation,ustice. These include Rawls’s theory of ‘justice as fairness’, Ronald Dworkin’s version of ‘luck egalitarianism’, and both right (e.g. Robert Nozick) and left (e.g. Michael Otsuka, Philippe Van Parijs) variants of libertarianism. This book has two primary goals. The first goal is the negative aim of作者: 苦惱 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 08:20
The Simplifying Assumptions of Rawlsian Justice,emporary theories of justice, including John Rawls’s theory of justice as fairness, Robert Nozick’s entitlement theory of justice, Ronald Dworkin’s defence of luck egalitarianism, as well as recent versions of left-libertarianism (Otsuka [2003] and Van Parijs [1995]). While many of the specific conc作者: agitate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 10:44
The Cost-Blind Approach to Rights (Continued...),front with libertarians like Robert Nozick. The rise of rights-based theories of justice in contemporary debates was due largely to what many saw as a deficiency with utilitarianism. A public philosophy premised on the idea of maximizing the greatest happiness of the greatest numbers could not, crit作者: 單調(diào)女 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 15:23 作者: Arbitrary 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 18:47
Should the Left Embrace Left-Libertarianism?,y offer a plethora of different prescriptions for remedying these injustices. In this chapter I critically assess another principled account of justice that functions at the level of ideal theory - .Left-libertarian theories of justice hold that agents are full self-owners and that natural resources作者: cringe 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 23:15
Neutrality and Toleration,seriously interfere with conduct one finds objectionable’ (1996, p. 28).. Liberals champion toleration as one of the main virtues of a just society. The tolerant society is one which protects a diverse array of fundamental freedoms ranging from freedom of conscience and religion to freedom of expres作者: construct 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 04:16
,The ‘Dialogical Model’ of Judicial Review,at the principles of justice are. These include the assumption that society is a . and a society of . members. Let us briefly revisit these concerns by comparing how Rawls’s simplifying assumptions skew the kinds of concerns that I highlighted in the beginning of Chapter 1. Recall the six scenarios 作者: 并排上下 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 07:40
Deliberative Democracy,ia . and a democratic process rather than through deception, manipulation or the appeal to violence. Civility inspires a moralized conception of democracy - it moves us to search for a reasoned, negotiated compromise on how we are to live together as a society. But civility is also attuned to real-l作者: foliage 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 13:06
Concluding Thoughts and Review, judgement of, the . of one’s society. What is the benchmark by which we can both judge the severity of our individual and collective failings and, at the same time, invoke to help inspire and direct us towards a more fair and humane society? Unfortunately a good deal of contemporary political philo作者: gustation 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 16:21
Concluding Thoughts and Review,sophy, which is dominated by the principled paradigm of ideal theory, misplaces or misconstrues what this benchmark is. The appropriate metric for measuring the justness of our society is, I have argued, a . metric. One that emphasizes the virtues of fair social cooperation - toleration, civility and fairness.作者: escalate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 20:30
The Cost-Blind Approach to Rights (Continued...),h a violation is justified. This is the line of argument that Rawls utilizes against utilitarianism. Justice denies, argues Rawls, Dworkin and Nozick, that the loss of freedom for some is made right by a greater good shared by others.作者: Acetaminophen 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 03:14
beralism‘. He critically assesses the main contemporary theories of justice and tackles a number of applied topics, ranging from constitutional design and free speech to welfare reform and economic incentives.978-1-349-51650-6978-0-230-59687-0作者: 馬賽克 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 04:17 作者: TAP 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 09:00
Neutrality and Toleration,tyles they find most fulfilling, regardless of the fact that the majority of people may or may not find their choices objectionable. The tolerant society is thus one which respects citizens as autonomous persons..作者: 無能的人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 12:48
Practical Attacks on a Cryptosystem Proposed in Patent WO/2009/066313,thm for key generation is missing. In this paper, we find that related-key attacks of negligibly low complexity (data/time) can result when certain (flawed) key generation algorithms are used. We also present a negligibly-low-complexity attack in a non-related-key setting. We hope that the results caution potential users of the cryptosystem.
