標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Hypotheses and Perspectives in the History and Philosophy of Science; Homage to Alexandre Raffaele Pisano,Joseph Agassi,Daria Drozdova Boo [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: fathom 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 16:26
書(shū)目名稱Hypotheses and Perspectives in the History and Philosophy of Science影響因子(影響力)
書(shū)目名稱Hypotheses and Perspectives in the History and Philosophy of Science影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Hypotheses and Perspectives in the History and Philosophy of Science網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度
書(shū)目名稱Hypotheses and Perspectives in the History and Philosophy of Science網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Hypotheses and Perspectives in the History and Philosophy of Science被引頻次
書(shū)目名稱Hypotheses and Perspectives in the History and Philosophy of Science被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Hypotheses and Perspectives in the History and Philosophy of Science年度引用
書(shū)目名稱Hypotheses and Perspectives in the History and Philosophy of Science年度引用學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Hypotheses and Perspectives in the History and Philosophy of Science讀者反饋
書(shū)目名稱Hypotheses and Perspectives in the History and Philosophy of Science讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 種族被根除 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 22:05
Who Will Provide the Next Financial Model?f fashion. In this paper I argue that, if wrong regarding the experimental side of Galilean science, Koyré’s interpretation was substantially correct as to its crucial ontological and epistemological components. In this light I defend the view that Galileo should be seen as an advocate of a physico-mathematical version of Platonism.作者: 短程旅游 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 03:00
,On Galileo’s Platonism, Again,f fashion. In this paper I argue that, if wrong regarding the experimental side of Galilean science, Koyré’s interpretation was substantially correct as to its crucial ontological and epistemological components. In this light I defend the view that Galileo should be seen as an advocate of a physico-mathematical version of Platonism.作者: CANE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 06:06 作者: 不能逃避 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 11:02
Raffaele Pisano,Joseph Agassi,Daria DrozdovaFeatures insightful studies on Alexandre Koyré.Reevaluates current thinking in history, philosophy, and foundations of science.Explores Koyré’s intellectual matrix and heritage within the interdiscipl作者: 勛章 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 14:35 作者: epicondylitis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:47
Proletarianization and Commodificationnd Platonism were challenged through the experimental and then the sociological turns in the historiography of science of the last three decades of the previous century. Nonetheless, his theses could still be maintained, albeit with due qualifications.作者: 通便 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 22:16 作者: 愉快么 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:13
Book 2018ential historians of science of the 20th century, who re-evaluated prevalent thinking on the history and philosophy of science. In particular, it explores Koyré’s intellectual matrix and heritage within interdisciplinary fields of historical, epistemological and philosophical scientific thought. Koy作者: Invigorate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 08:03
,Alexandre Koyré and Blaise Pascal,e celebrated Rouen experiments, two largely admitted ideas in France. However, by this speech, he opened a new field, which had never clearly appeared before: the important part of the “art de persuader” in Pascal’s scientific works.作者: Charitable 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 19:46
Doubts About CRAMRA: June 1988 to May 1989,oyré consists of using his methodological principles in order to shed light upon André-Marie Ampère’s scientific practices. In my opinion, these practices imply the same kind of unity of trans-scientific ideas as those studied by Koyré.作者: 善于騙人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:55
Who Will Be the Next President? Viviani. Koyré comes to the conclusion that they were never carried out; the Vulgate, of course, was and remains the one handed down to us by Viviani, but can we relegate Koyré’s observations to the margins? Can the “history of effects” (.) wipe the well-grounded doubt that this tale is celebratory or a .?作者: Enteropathic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 02:33 作者: 令人作嘔 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 07:37 作者: 老巫婆 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 14:38 作者: GILD 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:40
https://doi.org/10.1007/b138248author, it is nonetheless impossible to distinguish Koyré’s and Cassirer’s own reconstructions of modern science from their respective philosophical backgrounds, which belong to very different philosophical traditions such as Husserlian phenomenology and Marburg neo-Kantianism.作者: arabesque 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 20:43 作者: Analogy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 02:07
,“The Philosophers and the Machine”: Philosophy of Mathematics and History of Science in Alexandre Kinally, I attempt to understand the extent to which Koyré’s internalism, which originates in this controversy, continues to raise important issues, such as the autonomy of science, in the face of sociological interpretations of science.作者: nauseate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 05:45
,Koyré, Cassirer and the History of Science,author, it is nonetheless impossible to distinguish Koyré’s and Cassirer’s own reconstructions of modern science from their respective philosophical backgrounds, which belong to very different philosophical traditions such as Husserlian phenomenology and Marburg neo-Kantianism.作者: 頭腦冷靜 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 11:06 作者: 飲料 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 12:30
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58017-7Koyré did not place sufficient emphasis on scientific controversies, even though, differing from other historians, and opposing Duhem’s views, he did not suppress them and he emphasized the role of metaphysics and of theology as their background, thus recognizing the proper place of metaphysics and 作者: 砍伐 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 17:26 作者: 玉米 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 21:01
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64504-9 to reduce his initial dual characterization to one single formula. I argue here that, on the contrary, the duality of description had a special meaning which permits us to keep in focus the complexity of the intellectual change that occurred during the seventeenth century, when?a new science was ri作者: 有發(fā)明天才 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:32 作者: intoxicate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 04:39
Basic Notions of Critical Ultrasound which may have led Descartes to hold the doctrine. We claim that, while voluntarism will have to be ignored in an overall understanding of Descartes’ thought, it has genuine philosophical significance because a “voluntarist demon” represents the most formidable skeptical threat possible.作者: 脫毛 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 11:19 作者: anarchist 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:57
Mindfulness and Whole Person Care,leagues and, as I will show, never abandoned his phenomenological roots. Moreover, there is reason to believe that the historical–epistemological works that Koyré has become known for are a continuation of and a response to Husserlian phenomenology.作者: fledged 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:34 作者: 瑣碎 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 00:44
Bethany Jill Williams,Darren Treanoreed, Koyré is still nowadays an almost unavoidable reference point for Kepler’s .. We refer to several interpretations of his. This is the reason why we think appropriate to present this work in homage to Alexandre Koyré.作者: 易達(dá)到 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 03:22
Whole-Body FDG PET Imaging in Oncologyhers about the intricate links between present and past. In 1946 he stated that “the reality of time” could only be revealed through transformations and, at the same time, that there was only past from the stance of a present. Therefore, an epistemological transformation in the present called for a 作者: RAGE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 07:15
The Wheat in the View of Our Whole-Menu,lural), his loosening of Koyré’s central category of “metaphysics,” and his invention of the crucial conception of “normal science.” Additionally, Kuhn’s devotion to Koyré explains some historiographical pitfalls and blind spots that bedeviled his historical work: for example, his ignoring early mod作者: shrill 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 09:38 作者: Tremor 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 15:10
Hypotheses and Perspectives in the History and Philosophy of Science978-3-319-61712-1作者: hyperuricemia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 19:05
ers much-needed insights into the subject from historical, nature of science, and philosophical perspectives. It provides an absorbing and revealing read for historians, philosophers and scientists alike.978-3-319-87141-7978-3-319-61712-1作者: Urologist 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:36
Book 2018fluence. The book brings together contributions from leading experts in the field, and offers much-needed insights into the subject from historical, nature of science, and philosophical perspectives. It provides an absorbing and revealing read for historians, philosophers and scientists alike.作者: 六邊形 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 03:43 作者: 莎草 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 06:56 作者: Delirium 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 14:07
,Alexandre Koyré’s Essential Features of the Scientific Revolution, to reduce his initial dual characterization to one single formula. I argue here that, on the contrary, the duality of description had a special meaning which permits us to keep in focus the complexity of the intellectual change that occurred during the seventeenth century, when?a new science was ri作者: 前面 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 16:31 作者: Pruritus 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 19:05
,Is Descartes’ Theological Voluntarism Compatible with His Philosophy?, which may have led Descartes to hold the doctrine. We claim that, while voluntarism will have to be ignored in an overall understanding of Descartes’ thought, it has genuine philosophical significance because a “voluntarist demon” represents the most formidable skeptical threat possible.作者: amnesia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 02:39 作者: 舊石器 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 05:16 作者: 課程 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 08:36 作者: 百科全書(shū) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 14:17 作者: 燈泡 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 17:51
,Alexandre Koyré: History and Actuality,hers about the intricate links between present and past. In 1946 he stated that “the reality of time” could only be revealed through transformations and, at the same time, that there was only past from the stance of a present. Therefore, an epistemological transformation in the present called for a 作者: 蚊帳 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 23:03
,The Pitfalls and Possibilities of Following Koyré: The Younger Tom Kuhn, “Critical Historian,” on Tlural), his loosening of Koyré’s central category of “metaphysics,” and his invention of the crucial conception of “normal science.” Additionally, Kuhn’s devotion to Koyré explains some historiographical pitfalls and blind spots that bedeviled his historical work: for example, his ignoring early mod作者: bronchodilator 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 03:50 作者: 畸形 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 06:56 作者: Decrepit 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 10:11
,“The Philosophers and the Machine”: Philosophy of Mathematics and History of Science in Alexandre Kalmost unexamined by Koyré’s commentators, his first papers on the foundations of mathematics (which present his criticism of Bertrand Russell’s paradox), to establish a link between Koyré’s mathematical realism?– present in his preoccupation with the foundations of mathematics?– and his later histo作者: 開(kāi)始從未 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 15:42
,Koyré and Galileo: The Myth of the Leaning Tower’s Scientific Experiment,ore the publication of his ., he addressed the issue in an article entitled “Galilée et l’expérience de Pise.” Investigating on how to value the experiment in the context of the foundation of mechanics, therefore, is not confined to the level of theoretical statements, but translates into considerin作者: metropolitan 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 17:04 作者: 性別 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 20:45
,Alexandre Koyré and Blaise Pascal, speech in Royaumont is still famous, as he disturbed the French audience by questioning the genius of Pascal as a mathematician and the reality of the celebrated Rouen experiments, two largely admitted ideas in France. However, by this speech, he opened a new field, which had never clearly appeared作者: expound 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 02:39 作者: 貪婪的人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 07:33 作者: debunk 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 12:46 作者: 共同時(shí)代 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 16:17 作者: dysphagia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 20:18
,Is Descartes’ Theological Voluntarism Compatible with His Philosophy?,y?– is incompatible with every bit of his philosophy. We agree and explain how voluntarism undermines the major arguments (including the .) in the . by making them . or .. Thus clear and distinct ideas are not useful as premises in an argument for God’s existence except on the assumption that God ex作者: Assignment 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 22:42 作者: Senescent 時(shí)間: 2025-4-1 04:49 作者: 不舒服 時(shí)間: 2025-4-1 07:09 作者: 長(zhǎng)矛 時(shí)間: 2025-4-1 11:17 作者: endure 時(shí)間: 2025-4-1 17:47
,On the Conceptualization of Force in Johannes Kepler’s ,: An Interplay Between Physics/Mathematics his early considerations in the . (1596) until his ripest conceptions expounded in the . (1618–1621). Kepler tried to supply a dynamical explanation to the planetary movements. This is an important novelty because astronomy was traditionally a kinematical science. Based on the main accredited liter作者: ANTE 時(shí)間: 2025-4-1 18:46
,Koyré Versus Olschki–Zilsel,e dont la physique modern […]” (Koyré 1939, p. 12; 1943b, p. 400) that he alleged happened at the time of Galileo. For Koyré these changes are due to “pure unadulterated thought” because, as expressed in his 1943 critique of the Olschki–Zilsel position, science “is made not by engineers or craftsmen作者: 漸變 時(shí)間: 2025-4-2 00:41 作者: 佛刊 時(shí)間: 2025-4-2 04:56
,The Pitfalls and Possibilities of Following Koyré: The Younger Tom Kuhn, “Critical Historian,” on T.. and during the majority of his tenure in the Princeton history of science group—focused on “mapping” the shape of the history of the physical sciences and on modeling the dynamics, or “motor,” of scientific traditions. This paper examines the younger Kuhn’s excursions in map and motor design. It 作者: 鉗子 時(shí)間: 2025-4-2 07:48
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58017-7ce texts the way they read old classics in the humanities. Historians of science can help that project by debunking the myth that to be a good historian of science one has to be professional. Indeed, it is hard to say whether as a professional Koyré was a historian of science or of religious thought
