標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Handbook of Bioethical Decisions. Volume I; Decisions at the Ben Erick Valdés,Juan Alberto Lecaros Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) [打印本頁] 作者: Wilson 時間: 2025-3-21 18:43
書目名稱Handbook of Bioethical Decisions. Volume I影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Handbook of Bioethical Decisions. Volume I影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Handbook of Bioethical Decisions. Volume I網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Handbook of Bioethical Decisions. Volume I網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Handbook of Bioethical Decisions. Volume I被引頻次
書目名稱Handbook of Bioethical Decisions. Volume I被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Handbook of Bioethical Decisions. Volume I年度引用
書目名稱Handbook of Bioethical Decisions. Volume I年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Handbook of Bioethical Decisions. Volume I讀者反饋
書目名稱Handbook of Bioethical Decisions. Volume I讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: blight 時間: 2025-3-22 00:07
The Role and Maintenance of Trustcertain kind of child into existence because they recognise that they themselves or society lack the necessary support and/or capacity to look after such a child. Finally, individuals and society may decide not to bring a certain kind of child into existence, because the value of his or her life is 作者: 使高興 時間: 2025-3-22 02:44
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4148-8y see as unfair advantage. The second, which previously has received little attention, is the tremendous price that is likely to be charged for SGE, which makes the debate about enhancement almost moot because even the needs of the most seriously ill will almost surely not be met, raising serious co作者: Instinctive 時間: 2025-3-22 04:57 作者: 大溝 時間: 2025-3-22 09:17 作者: cartilage 時間: 2025-3-22 14:04
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25082-0not? and if so, where should we draw the line between what is legal and what is not, in other words, what should be the criteria for the ethical and legal evaluation of these treatments? In simple terms, what should be the criteria for the ethical and legal evaluation of these treatments?作者: Peculate 時間: 2025-3-22 20:02
Learning from Icarus: The Impact of CRISPR on Gene Editing Ethics risks, and might threaten our commitment to solidarity. This chapter explores long-standing GE ethics considerations including utilitarian calculations, “Playing God,” transparency and democracy, informed consent, treating disease versus accepting difference, and most importantly fairness and equit作者: Inkling 時間: 2025-3-22 22:59
Bioethical Decision Making and Genome Editingcertain kind of child into existence because they recognise that they themselves or society lack the necessary support and/or capacity to look after such a child. Finally, individuals and society may decide not to bring a certain kind of child into existence, because the value of his or her life is 作者: 細(xì)頸瓶 時間: 2025-3-23 05:14 作者: vasculitis 時間: 2025-3-23 07:40 作者: 競選運(yùn)動 時間: 2025-3-23 11:45 作者: Chagrin 時間: 2025-3-23 15:03 作者: 聲音刺耳 時間: 2025-3-23 20:42
Book 2023bioethical decisions as well as offering chapters by some of the most world renowned and prominent experts in bioethics, the .Handbook., Vol. I, is a paradigmatic text in its area and a valuable resource for courses on bioethics, and biomedical research, as well as courses that discuss ethics and th作者: growth-factor 時間: 2025-3-24 01:27
2730-5619 rominent experts in bioethics, the .Handbook., Vol. I, is a paradigmatic text in its area and a valuable resource for courses on bioethics, and biomedical research, as well as courses that discuss ethics and th978-3-031-29453-2978-3-031-29451-8Series ISSN 2730-5619 Series E-ISSN 2730-5627 作者: 保存 時間: 2025-3-24 06:06 作者: commensurate 時間: 2025-3-24 09:10
2730-5619 ominent experts on bioethics.Considers controversial topics The .Handbook of Bioethical Decisions.?is aimed at addressing and analyzing the most important ethical concerns and moral quandaries arisen in biomedical and scientific research. As such, it identifies and problematizes on a comprehensive r作者: 誓言 時間: 2025-3-24 12:38 作者: 吸引力 時間: 2025-3-24 15:32 作者: 有效 時間: 2025-3-24 22:13 作者: Tracheotomy 時間: 2025-3-25 02:24
Revolutionary and Educationalist,get a better idea of the debate and take their own position about these issues. The approach as usual in these settings is not pacific although it is eloquent and illustrative of the historical and current discussion on PGD’ scopes.作者: cinder 時間: 2025-3-25 05:55 作者: 反復(fù)拉緊 時間: 2025-3-25 11:22 作者: 外面 時間: 2025-3-25 13:07 作者: epicondylitis 時間: 2025-3-25 18:48
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24212-2plicate the main arguments for the necessary desirability and undesirability of LE. I conclude with some final critical remarks on the debate, emphasizing the need for public bioethicists to recognize and be more responsive to the theoretical and empirical pluralism characteristic of the postmodern liberal states in which they typically operate.作者: caldron 時間: 2025-3-25 22:37 作者: perjury 時間: 2025-3-26 03:06 作者: 亞當(dāng)心理陰影 時間: 2025-3-26 04:26 作者: CAPE 時間: 2025-3-26 10:39 作者: 省略 時間: 2025-3-26 15:57 作者: Grasping 時間: 2025-3-26 17:28 作者: 令人不快 時間: 2025-3-26 21:06 作者: 珠寶 時間: 2025-3-27 02:06 作者: mortuary 時間: 2025-3-27 08:51
,‘Neglected Genius’: The Romantic Canon, research can ever be acceptable and about what sort of limits, temporal or otherwise, it ought to be subject to, the fourteen-day rule has long formed a centerpiece of policies in numerous countries that affirm ethical concerns while also allowing room for research by marking fourteen days as a definitive limit.作者: allude 時間: 2025-3-27 11:03 作者: cochlea 時間: 2025-3-27 15:39
Limits of Debate: Governance of Human Embryo Research and the Making of the Fourteen-Day Rule research can ever be acceptable and about what sort of limits, temporal or otherwise, it ought to be subject to, the fourteen-day rule has long formed a centerpiece of policies in numerous countries that affirm ethical concerns while also allowing room for research by marking fourteen days as a definitive limit.作者: Confound 時間: 2025-3-27 20:47 作者: confide 時間: 2025-3-27 23:59 作者: 帽子 時間: 2025-3-28 03:04 作者: 取消 時間: 2025-3-28 09:33 作者: 最初 時間: 2025-3-28 12:07 作者: Obscure 時間: 2025-3-28 18:07
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403983060ible applications, clinical trials indicate its great potential to provide new forms of medical treatment, as well as cures, for a range of prevalent monogenic diseases, including several disorders of the blood (hemoglobinopathies). This chapter provides an overview of the nature of somatic cells, a作者: myocardium 時間: 2025-3-28 18:44 作者: Allergic 時間: 2025-3-29 02:06
Revolutionary and Educationalist,t other doors opened up by the technique, which entails far-reaching and controversial bioethical quandaries, are neglected. As a matter of fact, for some disabled parents, the best child possible may be a disabled one, and according to some arguments there might be good reasons to select for disabi作者: HPA533 時間: 2025-3-29 03:45 作者: 離開 時間: 2025-3-29 07:59
,‘Neglected Genius’: The Romantic Canon,he so called fourteen-day rule. It designates that human embryos should not be cultured in vitro beyond fourteen days of development. The fourteen-day rule has long been offered as an assurance that scientific horizons are subject to ethical limits. Over the course of several decades, it has also be作者: 絆住 時間: 2025-3-29 12:13
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230390225r some special circumstances. Furthermore, the entities created might not be treated according to what their special statute demands. This would have a negative impact on their quality of life, depriving it of many of the factors that usually bring happiness to living beings. On the other hand, ther作者: 公社 時間: 2025-3-29 19:26
,Phase Two: From ‘Real’ to ‘True’ Presence,t first, this issue raises a lot of questions including when, why, how, where, and for whom? Furthermore, society, religion, law, and culture entangle this issue even more. Human cloning discussions broadly consider a mass production of human clones. The therapeutic and reproductive cloning precede 作者: Expand 時間: 2025-3-29 20:03
Thomas Gray Arrives on the Scene,kfire. It can appear as if there is a “wisdom of nature” which we ignore at our peril. A recognition of this reality can manifest as a vaguely normative intuition, to the effect that it is “hubristic” to try to improve on nature, or that biomedical therapy is ok while enhancement is morally suspect.作者: 倔強(qiáng)一點(diǎn) 時間: 2025-3-30 02:33
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02310-3idual autonomy and on medical supervision most of these criticisms are avoidable. Secondly, the paper focuses on some social problems that follow on from access to mood enhancement, arguing that while there are ways to overcome them, they raise other problems. Thirdly, it examines issues of normaliz作者: 反復(fù)無常 時間: 2025-3-30 07:15 作者: 騎師 時間: 2025-3-30 08:20
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24212-2extualization for contemporary bioethics in general by locating it within postmodernity, which discloses crucial implications for what normative claims can possibly be justified within contemporary bioethics and clarifies the typical form that transgression of these limits takes in contemporary bioe作者: 大吃大喝 時間: 2025-3-30 13:27 作者: 高度 時間: 2025-3-30 17:29
Introduction: Biomedical Research in One World: Current and Future Challenges,hroughs to human health. Yet with these developments many questions arise about some technical aspects of achieving desired results and avoiding unwanted effects, and about a variety of uses that may include not only healing, but also preventing disease in current and future generations, or even alt作者: CERE 時間: 2025-3-30 22:23 作者: Spongy-Bone 時間: 2025-3-31 02:13 作者: 抱狗不敢前 時間: 2025-3-31 07:40
Therapeutic Genome Editinges. These approaches, however, have been confined to serious diseases due in large part to their toxicity. Somatic gene editing (SGE), which repairs undesirable variants, is changing the landscape. It may well have fewer side effects than prior technologies. Thus, it is possible to consider using th
