標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Handbook of Argumentation Theory; Frans H. van Eemeren,Bart Garssen,Jean H. M. Wagem Living reference work 20200th edition [打印本頁] 作者: osteomalacia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 16:36
書目名稱Handbook of Argumentation Theory影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Handbook of Argumentation Theory影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Handbook of Argumentation Theory網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Handbook of Argumentation Theory網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Handbook of Argumentation Theory被引頻次
書目名稱Handbook of Argumentation Theory被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Handbook of Argumentation Theory年度引用
書目名稱Handbook of Argumentation Theory年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Handbook of Argumentation Theory讀者反饋
書目名稱Handbook of Argumentation Theory讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 榨取 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 20:28
es.provides an excellent introduction to the various approac.The Handbook Argumentation Theory provides an up to date survey of the various theoretical contributions to the development of argumentation theory for all scholars interested in argumentation, informal logic and rhetoric. It describes the作者: 袋鼠 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 03:31 作者: vitreous-humor 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 05:21
http://image.papertrans.cn/h/image/420831.jpg作者: 運(yùn)動(dòng)的我 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:43
, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans,? Bart Verheij ?and Jean Wagemans, who are a coherent and prominent writing team whose expertise covers the whole field. The authors are assisted by an international Editorial Bo978-94-007-6883-3作者: Pert敏捷 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 15:31 作者: Halfhearted 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 17:31
Argumentation Theory,earch is required, followed by practical research aimed at exploiting the insights gained for improving methodically the analysis, evaluation, and production of argumentative discourse..In Sect. 1.3, some crucial concepts in argumentation theory are discussed: “standpoints,” “unexpressed premises,” 作者: ARIA 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:07
Classical Backgrounds,propositional logic..Aristotle’s systematic reflections on rhetoric as the art of finding the appropriate means of persuasion are the topic of attention in Sect. .. Sect. . deals with the classical system of rhetoric, which developed after Aristotle’s time. The system is illustrated by going systema作者: mercenary 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:45 作者: FLOAT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 05:54
Formal Dialectical Approaches,asis for a plethora of systems that incorporate Lorenzen’s rules for logical constants. Stepping somewhat back in time, the chapter then shifts in Sect. 6.6 to another kind of formal dialectic: one of Hamblin’s original systems. Hamblin’s approach is explained and illustrated by an extensive example作者: Commission 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:45 作者: milligram 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 15:03 作者: lipids 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 21:09
Postclassical Backgrounds,esulted in what Hamblin (.. London: Methuen, 1970) called “the standard treatment.” Sections 3.5 and 3.6 are devoted to a discussion of this standard treatment, Hamblin’s severe criticism of it, and the reactions which this controversy provoked..The chapter continues with discussions of the contribu作者: Vulvodynia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 23:39
Research in Related Disciplines and Non-Anglophone Areas,ers, in Sect. 12.6 an overview of argumentation research in the Nordic countries is given, in Sect. 12.7 of argumentation studies in German-speaking areas, and in Sect. 12.8 of argumentation studies in Dutch-speaking areas. The study of argumentation in French-speaking areas is discussed in Sect. 12作者: doxazosin 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 03:21
The New Rhetoric,and an overview is provided of the key notions and concepts of the new rhetoric. In Sect. 5.4 the notions of . and . are explained, the distinction between a . and the . is discussed, and in connection with this distinction, the difference between . and . is also discussed. Then, in Sect. 5.5, atten作者: ROOF 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 07:43 作者: Congeal 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 11:32 作者: dowagers-hump 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:03 作者: HERE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 20:45 作者: 完整 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 03:13 作者: 粘土 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 07:06
Morten Willatzen,Lok C. Lew Yan Voonpropositional logic..Aristotle’s systematic reflections on rhetoric as the art of finding the appropriate means of persuasion are the topic of attention in Sect. .. Sect. . deals with the classical system of rhetoric, which developed after Aristotle’s time. The system is illustrated by going systema作者: 折磨 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 08:41
Why Is Science the Way It Is Today?,tion to logic, dialectic, and rhetoric? The answers to these questions serve in fact as preambles to the theorizing..Sect. 8.4 concentrates on the first of the two branches that traditionally can be distinguished in communication studies: historical-political analysis, also known as .. Sect. 8.5 pro作者: Commission 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 13:10
Pieter Korteweg,Peter D. Van Looasis for a plethora of systems that incorporate Lorenzen’s rules for logical constants. Stepping somewhat back in time, the chapter then shifts in Sect. 6.6 to another kind of formal dialectic: one of Hamblin’s original systems. Hamblin’s approach is explained and illustrated by an extensive example作者: 影響帶來 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 16:51 作者: 虛弱 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 22:41
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-40757-5pect. At the sentence level, linguistic predicates are associated with certain sets of argumentative principles called.. Such. authorize in a particular speech community the drawing of certain conclusions. Another important concept in Anscombre and Ducrot’s theory is. (“many-voicedness”). By making 作者: inspired 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:01
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96364-4esulted in what Hamblin (.. London: Methuen, 1970) called “the standard treatment.” Sections 3.5 and 3.6 are devoted to a discussion of this standard treatment, Hamblin’s severe criticism of it, and the reactions which this controversy provoked..The chapter continues with discussions of the contribu作者: seruting 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 07:56
Dan Gabriel Cacuci,Ruixian Fangers, in Sect. 12.6 an overview of argumentation research in the Nordic countries is given, in Sect. 12.7 of argumentation studies in German-speaking areas, and in Sect. 12.8 of argumentation studies in Dutch-speaking areas. The study of argumentation in French-speaking areas is discussed in Sect. 12作者: 可轉(zhuǎn)變 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 11:27
and an overview is provided of the key notions and concepts of the new rhetoric. In Sect. 5.4 the notions of . and . are explained, the distinction between a . and the . is discussed, and in connection with this distinction, the difference between . and . is also discussed. Then, in Sect. 5.5, atten作者: 幻想 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:03 作者: 是限制 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 18:13
Evolution of Brazilian orange productional arguments is treated in Sect. 4.4. In Sect. 4.5, the difference between field-invariant and field-dependent aspects of argumentative discourse is explained, which is vital to the alternative to the formal approach to analytic arguments offered by Toulmin. In Sect. 4.6 the forms arguments take and作者: Coeval 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 00:10
Multiple Allelomorphs in The Duck,a community has been formed that addresses issues in argumentation theory focusing on methods and problems as studied in artificial intelligence. Much of this work is formal or computational in nature, but often has a relevance that goes beyond artificial intelligence per se. This chapter is an atte作者: 外向者 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 04:19
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230508972ord “argumentation” in ordinary language, a more technical definition is provided of the term. as it is for research purposes used in argumentation theory. In this definition, argumentation is connected with communication, interaction, accountability, and reasonableness..In Sect. 1.2, the descriptiv作者: LEER 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 06:58
Morten Willatzen,Lok C. Lew Yan Voonngs of dialectic and logic, the chapter turns in Sect. . to Zeno’s . technique and Plato’s three forms of dialectic, for those of rhetoric to the Sophists and the educator Isocrates..The chapter discusses Aristotle’s contributions to all three disciplines mentioned. In Sect. . Aristotle’s theory of 作者: instulate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 10:20 作者: fatuity 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 15:49
Pieter Korteweg,Peter D. Van Looature of formal approaches in general and the ways in which they can be used, followed in Sect. 6.2 by a long exposé about the Erlangen School and its project for the reform of thought and speech needed to make a new start at reasonable dialogue. It is shown how Lorenzen’s dialogical logic (his rule作者: PANG 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 18:38
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3398-4. refers to a collection of attempts to develop a method for the analysis and evaluation of natural language arguments that offers an alternative to formal logic..In Sect. . the historical backgrounds of the informal logic movement are sketched. The scholars who played an important role in creating 作者: 改進(jìn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:47 作者: Demonstrate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 03:29 作者: commonsense 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 09:54
Dan Gabriel Cacuci,Ruixian Fangs. First, attention is paid to research in some disciplines and research programs that connect with argumentation theory and may even have some overlap with it. In Sect. 12.2 critical discourse analysis is discussed, in Sect. 12.3 historical controversy analysis, in Sect. 12.4 persuasion research an作者: 賠償 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 12:26
Their .titled .: ., first published in French in 1958, is a seminal work in argumentation theory..In Sect. 5.3 the intellectual backgrounds of the authors and in Sect. 5.2 some general characteristics of their theory are described. It is explained how the idea of developing the new rhetoric was born作者: Prognosis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 14:36 作者: 沙草紙 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 22:10
Evolution of Brazilian orange productionzing the way in which claims can be justified in response to challenges. The model replaces the old concepts of “premise” and “conclusion” with the new concepts of “claim,” “data,” “warrant,” “modal qualifier,” “rebuttal,” and “backing.” Because of the impact Toulmin’s ideas about logic and everyday作者: 痛苦一生 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 02:42 作者: 易于出錯(cuò) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 05:57
Argumentation Theory,ord “argumentation” in ordinary language, a more technical definition is provided of the term. as it is for research purposes used in argumentation theory. In this definition, argumentation is connected with communication, interaction, accountability, and reasonableness..In Sect. 1.2, the descriptiv作者: cochlea 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 07:23 作者: 細(xì)菌等 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 13:19 作者: 向外才掩飾 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 16:50 作者: ANTIC 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 23:28 作者: Arthropathy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 23:55 作者: 初學(xué)者 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 06:36 作者: 假裝是你 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 09:11
Research in Related Disciplines and Non-Anglophone Areas,s. First, attention is paid to research in some disciplines and research programs that connect with argumentation theory and may even have some overlap with it. In Sect. 12.2 critical discourse analysis is discussed, in Sect. 12.3 historical controversy analysis, in Sect. 12.4 persuasion research an
