標題: Titlebook: Handbook of Abductive Cognition; Lorenzo Magnani Reference work 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 Abductive Cognition.Hypothetical [打印本頁] 作者: Precise 時間: 2025-3-21 20:09
書目名稱Handbook of Abductive Cognition影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Handbook of Abductive Cognition影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Handbook of Abductive Cognition網(wǎng)絡公開度
書目名稱Handbook of Abductive Cognition網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名
書目名稱Handbook of Abductive Cognition被引頻次
書目名稱Handbook of Abductive Cognition被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Handbook of Abductive Cognition年度引用
書目名稱Handbook of Abductive Cognition年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Handbook of Abductive Cognition讀者反饋
書目名稱Handbook of Abductive Cognition讀者反饋學科排名
作者: 防御 時間: 2025-3-22 00:04 作者: 使?jié)M足 時間: 2025-3-22 01:51
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137345868blems are formulated and solutions take shape in the first phases of inquiry. Abduction has evolved with transformations in philosophy. The four chapters shortly introduced concentrate on semiotic, methodological, and epistemological issues surrounding abduction.作者: IVORY 時間: 2025-3-22 08:04
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-8063-8 thinking on abduction, in which the logical framework is largely syllogistic, and the mature phase, in which abduction becomes the first step in the three-step process of scientific inquiry. The problems of the validity of abductive reasoning and that of the methodology of abductive reasoning are also briefly discussed.作者: 豐富 時間: 2025-3-22 11:16 作者: 藕床生厭倦 時間: 2025-3-22 13:04
Peirce’s Abduction thinking on abduction, in which the logical framework is largely syllogistic, and the mature phase, in which abduction becomes the first step in the three-step process of scientific inquiry. The problems of the validity of abductive reasoning and that of the methodology of abductive reasoning are also briefly discussed.作者: bromide 時間: 2025-3-22 18:13 作者: 男生如果明白 時間: 2025-3-22 21:15 作者: 言行自由 時間: 2025-3-23 05:08 作者: Consensus 時間: 2025-3-23 08:39
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34998-1or abduction. The chapters are technical, but they all provide the intuition and rationale behind the notions presented. The diversity of frameworks displayed in this section shows the wide variety of formal tools for inductive and abductive reasoning modeling, a logical perspective for modeling cognition.作者: judiciousness 時間: 2025-3-23 10:53 作者: Vital-Signs 時間: 2025-3-23 15:05 作者: semble 時間: 2025-3-23 22:04
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137120762tion as a powerful method of discovery, probabilistic confirmation, or acceptance of the best explanation. This chapter concludes that successful abduction leads to increasing truthlikeness, so that it is a valuable guide in truth-seeking and scientific progress.作者: 火花 時間: 2025-3-24 00:20 作者: 祖先 時間: 2025-3-24 03:28
Abduction and Truthtion as a powerful method of discovery, probabilistic confirmation, or acceptance of the best explanation. This chapter concludes that successful abduction leads to increasing truthlikeness, so that it is a valuable guide in truth-seeking and scientific progress.作者: endure 時間: 2025-3-24 09:14
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04544-9aken at face-value, the epistemic devastation of all science speaks for itself. The objective of this chapter is to show that even on the face-value reading, mathematics could have a prosperous Peircean future, but not before some adroit adaptation of the semantics of fiction. It is a test case for abduction.作者: 挑剔為人 時間: 2025-3-24 14:03
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8258-4of metaphysical theories, such as perceptual realism. A justification of theory-generating abductions is possible based on a weak principle of causality that is in turn justified by a noncausal abduction.作者: 條約 時間: 2025-3-24 16:47
How Abduction Fares in Mathematical Spaceaken at face-value, the epistemic devastation of all science speaks for itself. The objective of this chapter is to show that even on the face-value reading, mathematics could have a prosperous Peircean future, but not before some adroit adaptation of the semantics of fiction. It is a test case for abduction.作者: Ingest 時間: 2025-3-24 21:42 作者: 信條 時間: 2025-3-25 02:24 作者: bacteria 時間: 2025-3-25 04:29 作者: 有權(quán)威 時間: 2025-3-25 10:59
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-01593-8 logical, linguistic, cognitive, and semiotic meanings. Thus attempts to characterize abduction as the “heuristics” of the operation of one’s psychology or cognitive architecture would leave the issue of the full nature and reach of abduction wanting.作者: DEMUR 時間: 2025-3-25 12:31
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6248-8ols from ., studying the properties of the given definitions, introducing an epistemic action representing the application of an abductive step, and providing illustrative examples. Two particular cases are explored: abduction for non-ideal (i.e., nonlogically omniscient) agents and abduction in multiagent scenarios.作者: Constrain 時間: 2025-3-25 18:55 作者: audiologist 時間: 2025-3-25 20:20 作者: 杠桿 時間: 2025-3-26 02:53
Abduction from a Dynamic Epistemic Perspective: Non-omniscient Agents and Multiagent Settingsols from ., studying the properties of the given definitions, introducing an epistemic action representing the application of an abductive step, and providing illustrative examples. Two particular cases are explored: abduction for non-ideal (i.e., nonlogically omniscient) agents and abduction in multiagent scenarios.作者: 杠桿 時間: 2025-3-26 07:18 作者: 不連貫 時間: 2025-3-26 12:08
Abduction and Perception in Peirce’s Account?of?Knowledgeclude processes resulting in judgments or in hypotheses, it can be inferential or non-inferential (e.g., an “insight”), and it can include nonpropositional associative processes involving only icons and indices (e.g., .). But while, in Peirce, “abduction” can cover so many different processes, it re作者: 混合物 時間: 2025-3-26 13:17
Discoverability in the Perspective of the EC-Model of Abductionolve the related abductive problem: discoverability is jeopardized. In this perspective – and given the fact that science produces and “maximizes” cognition through a process in which affirming truths implies negating truths–the analysis of abductive processes leads us to the emphasis on the importa作者: 漸變 時間: 2025-3-26 17:55 作者: indifferent 時間: 2025-3-27 00:33 作者: 令人發(fā)膩 時間: 2025-3-27 03:41 作者: Admire 時間: 2025-3-27 07:03
The Social Sciences and Democracyich means rational reconstruction of heuristic processes and dynamics involved in discovery. The chapter presents arguments both for the logic of pursuit without discovery interpretation, and for various ways of developing abduction as a logic of discovery, as well as supporting the potential of int作者: MIRE 時間: 2025-3-27 11:21
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01172-6clude processes resulting in judgments or in hypotheses, it can be inferential or non-inferential (e.g., an “insight”), and it can include nonpropositional associative processes involving only icons and indices (e.g., .). But while, in Peirce, “abduction” can cover so many different processes, it re作者: Seizure 時間: 2025-3-27 14:43
The Social Thought of Zygmunt Baumanolve the related abductive problem: discoverability is jeopardized. In this perspective – and given the fact that science produces and “maximizes” cognition through a process in which affirming truths implies negating truths–the analysis of abductive processes leads us to the emphasis on the importa作者: 翅膀拍動 時間: 2025-3-27 18:31
The Social Worlds of the Unborn(i.e., colligation, observation, and judgment), and finally with respect to the validity criterion for abduction, which is seen in “coherence.” In the section that follows, the concept of coherence is discussed, especially against the backdrop of it being taken as a criterion for “truth.” Here, the 作者: Matrimony 時間: 2025-3-28 01:06
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10253-2means of which validity is defined. Based on an interpretation of already existing dialogical systems, the aim is to put forward different kinds of abductions in which hypotheses are about the rules of interactions, from which arise the inferential level and logical notions such as validity.作者: Insatiable 時間: 2025-3-28 03:26 作者: transdermal 時間: 2025-3-28 07:58 作者: 吵鬧 時間: 2025-3-28 10:57 作者: innate 時間: 2025-3-28 18:02
Introduction to Philosophy and Abductionblems are formulated and solutions take shape in the first phases of inquiry. Abduction has evolved with transformations in philosophy. The four chapters shortly introduced concentrate on semiotic, methodological, and epistemological issues surrounding abduction.作者: gerontocracy 時間: 2025-3-28 22:37 作者: microscopic 時間: 2025-3-29 02:06 作者: grudging 時間: 2025-3-29 04:05 作者: arabesque 時間: 2025-3-29 09:05
Abduction and Perception in Peirce’s Account?of?Knowledge of inquiry to develop toward a “final opinion” or “final consensus” over the long run. Peirce holds . processes to be key to this development in several ways. Not only does he characterize any process through which an hypothesis is introduced as abductive, Peirce also insists that . is abductive. I作者: BOOM 時間: 2025-3-29 12:24 作者: 臭了生氣 時間: 2025-3-29 19:23
Discoverability in the Perspective of the EC-Model of Abductions, reasoning to hypotheses and the logical models of it. To this aim, when engaged in formalizing abductive reasoning, it is extremely useful to see inferences adopting the more general concepts of input and output instead of those of premisses and conclusions, which are standardly used to character作者: invert 時間: 2025-3-29 20:35 作者: ectropion 時間: 2025-3-30 02:00
The Logical Process and Validity of?Abductive?Inferencesas often been taken as no more than spontaneous impulse, Peirce held that it was an inference. Today, apart from Peirce’s original statement of the abductive inference, the Gabbay-Woods model (or simply the GW model) is presumably the most prominent account of it. This model is introduced and evalua作者: 全神貫注于 時間: 2025-3-30 07:37 作者: glomeruli 時間: 2025-3-30 12:12 作者: 混亂生活 時間: 2025-3-30 14:10
Imagination, Cognition, and Methods of Science in Peircean Abductionigand, economy, uberty, seduction, instinct, insight, and imagination. While such notions may suggest Peirce sliding into psychologism about logic, Peirce’s own texts show that we can give these concepts perfectly non-psychological, natural, and scientific glosses – namely those that integrate their作者: AER 時間: 2025-3-30 19:35
Introduction to Logics of Hypothetical Reasoning, Abduction, and Evidence .. Each of these chapters proposes innovative ways to extend these frameworks to account for ampliative reasoning, for (enumerative) induction, and for abduction. The chapters are technical, but they all provide the intuition and rationale behind the notions presented. The diversity of frameworks d作者: palette 時間: 2025-3-31 00:16 作者: 共同確定為確 時間: 2025-3-31 03:43
Abduction and Dialoguesges that thesis. Dialogical logic was initially designed for intuitionistic logic. Then, it took a pluralistic turn. However, except for rare exceptions, most of its developments are confined to deductive reasoning. Considering that they may constitute a unified framework for argumentation, what cou作者: 免除責任 時間: 2025-3-31 08:29 作者: opprobrious 時間: 2025-3-31 10:28
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137345868blems are formulated and solutions take shape in the first phases of inquiry. Abduction has evolved with transformations in philosophy. The four chapters shortly introduced concentrate on semiotic, methodological, and epistemological issues surrounding abduction.作者: gorgeous 時間: 2025-3-31 17:16 作者: Substitution 時間: 2025-3-31 20:48
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7058-8nderstood as a hypothesis-making reasoning, in the dynamic, collective, and meaning-making process of sign action, or semiosis. In general terms, abduction can be described as an ampliative form of argument which starts from a surprising fact, something unexpected, some state of doubt or curiosity a作者: Diluge 時間: 2025-4-1 00:22
The Social Sciences and Democracyverlapping interpretations. N. R. Hanson’s texts were crucial in defending and developing the idea that abduction can be interpreted as a logic of discovery. Many commentators since Hanson have been more hesitant on this and more in line with the logical empiricists, maintaining that discovery is no
