標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Handbook for the Historiography of Science; Mauro L. Condé,Marlon Salomon Reference work 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 Historio [打印本頁] 作者: 積聚 時間: 2025-3-21 18:13
書目名稱Handbook for the Historiography of Science影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Handbook for the Historiography of Science影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Handbook for the Historiography of Science網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Handbook for the Historiography of Science網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Handbook for the Historiography of Science被引頻次
書目名稱Handbook for the Historiography of Science被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Handbook for the Historiography of Science年度引用
書目名稱Handbook for the Historiography of Science年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Handbook for the Historiography of Science讀者反饋
書目名稱Handbook for the Historiography of Science讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: Cantankerous 時間: 2025-3-21 22:40
Handbook for the Historiography of Science978-3-031-27510-4Series ISSN 2523-7748 Series E-ISSN 2523-7756 作者: RLS898 時間: 2025-3-22 02:46 作者: VEIL 時間: 2025-3-22 06:43
Historiographies of Sciencehttp://image.papertrans.cn/h/image/420754.jpg作者: GRACE 時間: 2025-3-22 12:03
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27510-4Historiography of Science; Philosophy of History; Historical Epistemology; Thought Collective; Historica作者: Condense 時間: 2025-3-22 13:07
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-13909-6 of reflexivity). The main objective of this chapter is to show the originality of Bourdieu’s approach to the analysis of science by showing its link and theoretical positioning with respect to the main contemporary historiographical debates (such as historical epistemology and science and technology studies).作者: 評論性 時間: 2025-3-22 19:14
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137501950historical development of the concept of scientific revolution, followed by an overview of the five main philosophical accounts of scientific revolutions. It then challenges two historiographical assumptions of the philosophical analyses of scientific revolutions.作者: Legion 時間: 2025-3-22 22:49
Bourdieu and the Social History of Scientific Reason of reflexivity). The main objective of this chapter is to show the originality of Bourdieu’s approach to the analysis of science by showing its link and theoretical positioning with respect to the main contemporary historiographical debates (such as historical epistemology and science and technology studies).作者: vascular 時間: 2025-3-23 04:44
The Historiography of Scientific Revolutions: A Philosophical Reflectionhistorical development of the concept of scientific revolution, followed by an overview of the five main philosophical accounts of scientific revolutions. It then challenges two historiographical assumptions of the philosophical analyses of scientific revolutions.作者: annexation 時間: 2025-3-23 08:23 作者: Foreknowledge 時間: 2025-3-23 12:10 作者: 現(xiàn)任者 時間: 2025-3-23 17:34 作者: 使腐爛 時間: 2025-3-23 20:42 作者: 取消 時間: 2025-3-23 23:54 作者: 愚蠢人 時間: 2025-3-24 04:28 作者: 出汗 時間: 2025-3-24 07:40
Gaston Bachelard and Historical Epistemology: A New Perspective for the History of Science in the Twt the most important elements in the constitution of his epistemological reflection. The chapter closes with a brief localization of Bachelard’s epistemological reflection in relation to his literary philosophy, reinforcing the importance of the role that work represented in the constitution of contemporary French philosophy.作者: convert 時間: 2025-3-24 13:12 作者: Mosaic 時間: 2025-3-24 18:10 作者: Odyssey 時間: 2025-3-24 21:25 作者: Comedienne 時間: 2025-3-24 23:40 作者: chastise 時間: 2025-3-25 04:54 作者: Host142 時間: 2025-3-25 08:52 作者: Nerve-Block 時間: 2025-3-25 15:42
John Desmond Bernal and “Bernalism”on Bernal’s writings and on Bernal’s and Needham’s papers at the University of Cambridge, this chapter aims to assess Bernal’s historiographical approach in the light of the development of British scientific policy between the 1930s and the 1960s and of the debate on Marxism and history in Britain.作者: temperate 時間: 2025-3-25 16:51
Thomas Kuhn’s Legacy for the Historiography of Sciencetill to be achieved. In other words, Kuhn’s influence will be complete when the historiography of science deepens his guidelines for effective writing of the history of science, namely, a theory of the history of science that articulates (1) the historical and social aspects, (2) the idea of evoluti作者: 除草劑 時間: 2025-3-25 20:21 作者: 制定 時間: 2025-3-26 03:20
Embodied Boundaries of Historical Studies of Science: A Vision of Steven Shapin’s Historiographye exemplary case of the experimental philosophy of the English seventeenth century in order to show the way in which Shapin links the logic of finitism with the preconditions of knowledge in his approach to a fundamental theme in his work: the boundaries of scientific practice.作者: lymphedema 時間: 2025-3-26 08:04 作者: integral 時間: 2025-3-26 12:33 作者: 放牧 時間: 2025-3-26 12:53 作者: arsenal 時間: 2025-3-26 19:44 作者: Agronomy 時間: 2025-3-27 00:23
The Social Context of Health and Health Workere errors of the theoreticians fruitful and that (b) the author embraces a teleological, almost determinist conception of historical evolution as being governed by laws that make predictions of the future of theories possible. Lastly, based on the preceding considerations, the intention is to draft作者: 護(hù)身符 時間: 2025-3-27 04:55 作者: Flirtatious 時間: 2025-3-27 09:12 作者: 大暴雨 時間: 2025-3-27 10:23
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42727-0on Bernal’s writings and on Bernal’s and Needham’s papers at the University of Cambridge, this chapter aims to assess Bernal’s historiographical approach in the light of the development of British scientific policy between the 1930s and the 1960s and of the debate on Marxism and history in Britain.作者: fastness 時間: 2025-3-27 14:41
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23062-4till to be achieved. In other words, Kuhn’s influence will be complete when the historiography of science deepens his guidelines for effective writing of the history of science, namely, a theory of the history of science that articulates (1) the historical and social aspects, (2) the idea of evoluti作者: BUOY 時間: 2025-3-27 20:54
The Social Dynamics of George H. Meadt the background of Popper’s groundbreaking works in the philosophy of science. And it calls attention to what is possibly Agassi’s most relevant contribution to the historiography of science: regarding the history of metaphysics as integral to the history of scientific research, Agassi celebrates t作者: 字謎游戲 時間: 2025-3-27 23:03
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0586-3e exemplary case of the experimental philosophy of the English seventeenth century in order to show the way in which Shapin links the logic of finitism with the preconditions of knowledge in his approach to a fundamental theme in his work: the boundaries of scientific practice.作者: 內(nèi)向者 時間: 2025-3-28 05:25 作者: 含水層 時間: 2025-3-28 08:53 作者: 我的巨大 時間: 2025-3-28 12:02
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73464-9he notion of truth. To speak of a “French school” of philosophy of science would undoubtedly put too much emphasis on an institutional approach, even if the importance of the . is undeniable. To speak of a French tradition would underestimate the obvious differences between the authors and would lea作者: 輕觸 時間: 2025-3-28 15:21
2523-7748 nd traditions that have established the writing of the history of science.?.This book can be conceived as a reference work not only for professional historians and philosophers but also for academics from diffe978-3-031-27510-4Series ISSN 2523-7748 Series E-ISSN 2523-7756 作者: 伸展 時間: 2025-3-28 20:28 作者: CEDE 時間: 2025-3-28 22:54
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230514119of science possible and general conditions concerning the intellectual context of the day and more specific ones regarding the Russian born French historian’s intellectual trajectory must be considered..The first works on the history of science that Alexandre Koyré wrote and published date back to t作者: commute 時間: 2025-3-29 06:53
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30792-8 importance lies principally in the novel perspective of his epistemology which, given its eminently philosophical stance in the face of the profound transformations in the sciences (particularly physics, chemistry, and mathematics) that marked the early decades of the twentieth century, has become 作者: 性行為放縱者 時間: 2025-3-29 09:14
The Social Determinants of Health in Indiaattention away from its standard objects like physics and astronomy and reoriented toward the life sciences. But what exactly is a historical epistemology of the life sciences? In recent years, it seems to mean (with Rheinberger) a historicized reflection on concept construction in, e.g., molecular 作者: antiandrogen 時間: 2025-3-29 13:12
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137005519thought collective. We aim to demonstrate that, besides introducing the idea that social and historical factors condition scientific knowledge, Fleck was also a pioneer in conceiving biology as a model for epistemology. Unfortunately, the Kuhnian reading of Fleck’s work emphasized this social approa作者: 占卜者 時間: 2025-3-29 16:41 作者: 胖人手藝好 時間: 2025-3-29 21:58
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23062-4work and discusses his important contribution to the historiography of science. The first part analyzes his masterpiece, .. Next, Kuhn’s debate with Karl Popper’s philosophy of science in the 1960s is interpreted as a crucial confrontation between two traditions of research on science established ar作者: Mitigate 時間: 2025-3-30 01:16
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-13909-6ent one of the nerve centers of Bourdieusian reflections. In the thought of this author, the theme of science has been both an object of socio-historical investigation and a cardinal problem of epistemological reflection – a way to justify the validity of sociological research in itself (the problem作者: Amendment 時間: 2025-3-30 06:19 作者: 油氈 時間: 2025-3-30 09:51
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0586-3entific knowledge and of all historical narrative. Shapin’s historiographical perspective is an attempt to displace the boundaries of scientific practice established by traditional historiography. These displacements entail a commitment to the central theses of meaning finitism, postulated by the St作者: 喪失 時間: 2025-3-30 16:06
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01576-4on science. Although Hacking is an analytical philosopher, his work has a truly historical character as a result of his support in Michel Foucault’s history of the present and his proposal of a style of scientific reasoning based on Alistair Crombie’s notion of style of scientific thinking. Starting作者: plasma 時間: 2025-3-30 18:45
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01900-7e French tradition of historical epistemology (namely, Bachelard, Canguilhem, and Foucault) and with the field of science studies, intending to integrate the history of science into history .. Studying the series of collective books organized in the recent decades by the American historian and her i作者: Obsequious 時間: 2025-3-30 21:52
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137501950is the best unit of analysis in the historiography of scientific revolutions. Nor is there a consensus on what best explains the nature of scientific revolutions. This chapter provides a critical examination of the historiography of scientific revolutions. It begins with a brief introduction to the 作者: 延期 時間: 2025-3-31 04:14
The Social Evolution of Indonesia analyzed the evolution of philosophy of science and its connection with history of science 30?years after the publication of .. Kuhn’s verdict ought to be understood as the explicit exposition of his viewpoint on a problem raised by his masterpiece, the legitimization of relativism, seen as the cen作者: Entreaty 時間: 2025-3-31 05:39
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73464-9ms to be a philosophy of “the particular sciences” and not of “science in general.” It is also characterized by its historical character. But history is taken here in the very particular sense of a “critical” history and expands into a broader “history of rationalities.” A historical approach to thi
