標題: Titlebook: ; [打印本頁] 作者: JAR 時間: 2025-3-21 19:05
書目名稱Grounding in Medieval Philosophy影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Grounding in Medieval Philosophy影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Grounding in Medieval Philosophy網絡公開度
書目名稱Grounding in Medieval Philosophy網絡公開度學科排名
書目名稱Grounding in Medieval Philosophy被引頻次
書目名稱Grounding in Medieval Philosophy被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Grounding in Medieval Philosophy年度引用
書目名稱Grounding in Medieval Philosophy年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Grounding in Medieval Philosophy讀者反饋
書目名稱Grounding in Medieval Philosophy讀者反饋學科排名
作者: arthroplasty 時間: 2025-3-21 23:15 作者: Nonthreatening 時間: 2025-3-22 03:35
,Up in the Air: Buridan’s Principled Rejection of Grounding, are?both free of paradox and ungrounded. This paper outlines and defends Buridan’s approach and suggests that it may give reason to think that ungroundedness is not problematic in semantics or in metaphysics.作者: 無所不知 時間: 2025-3-22 04:54 作者: 騎師 時間: 2025-3-22 10:50 作者: jettison 時間: 2025-3-22 13:59 作者: jettison 時間: 2025-3-22 20:14 作者: 褲子 時間: 2025-3-22 22:35
Towards a Calculus of Object Programs,pose what I think is a much closer and certainly more developed anticipation of theories of grounding as dependence in the work of Peter Abelard. Abelard explicitly appeals to grounding in his account of the ontological structure of substance in terms of what we now call tropes. This theory itself t作者: Alpha-Cells 時間: 2025-3-23 02:32
Von ?Seitenketten“ Ganz Erfülltame to provide the first unified framework for the treatment of inference as such. With such a development came the task of unifying the various justifications for inferences treated in earlier frameworks. Prior to the appearance of theories of consequences, the task of providing a real foundation, 作者: adipose-tissue 時間: 2025-3-23 09:27 作者: 培養(yǎng) 時間: 2025-3-23 10:54 作者: 高爾夫 時間: 2025-3-23 17:43
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-5324-6 eliminated from causal statements. This paper argues that this reading can be refined, and that according to Ockham the analysis of causality can go one step further. In reaction to Scotus’s concept of essentially ordered causes, Ockham claims that a relation of “essential dependence” holds between作者: 憎惡 時間: 2025-3-23 20:06
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62068-3is, for Ockham, to obey divine commands, and what makes it right to do so. The most plausible explanations of what makes it right to obey divine commands are God’s goodness and God’s power. The textual evidence in Ockham points towards both, but I judge the preponderance of the evidence to lean in f作者: nauseate 時間: 2025-3-24 01:57
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19401-8 are?both free of paradox and ungrounded. This paper outlines and defends Buridan’s approach and suggests that it may give reason to think that ungroundedness is not problematic in semantics or in metaphysics.作者: musicologist 時間: 2025-3-24 02:46
Images, Buildings and the Living Context,etaphysical grounding of logic. As they assumed, it is at least sometimes a fact that a conclusion follows from some premises; here it is questioned how they thought this fact, or logical validity, to be grounded. The early medieval Arabic tradition (e.g. Ibn Sinā) thought in a way comparable to Imm作者: 令人苦惱 時間: 2025-3-24 08:11
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-86045-3nsensus that grounding is the same in all its typical instances. In this chapter I show that the late scholastic philosopher Francisco Suárez (1549–1617) can be seen as challenging this consensus since he gives an altogether different account of the way vital capacities are “grounded” in their under作者: 因無茶而冷淡 時間: 2025-3-24 14:22
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16404-2this, thinks Wilson, is that the work that Big-G Grounding is invoked for can be better done by what she calls small-g grounding relations: membership, parenthood, realization, and so on. Contra Wilson, I argue that small-g grounding relations may not allow us to do all the grounding work that needs作者: 最初 時間: 2025-3-24 17:05
Introduction: Grounding Then and Now,stotelian tradition from the Middle Ages onward. A distinctive feature of medieval models of explanation is that they predate the divide between explanations in the humanities and social sciences and explanations in the natural sciences (e.g. physics, chemistry, and biology) that has become central 作者: Visual-Acuity 時間: 2025-3-24 21:40
,Ontological Priority and Grounding in Aristotle’s ,priority would make this plausible. This question is the focus of my paper. I will examine what has been the standard account of his notion of ontological priority—the “modal-existential” account—and the problems it entails, as well as some scholarly alternatives to it. I will defend my own alternat作者: murmur 時間: 2025-3-24 23:23 作者: 做事過頭 時間: 2025-3-25 06:52 作者: 泥瓦匠 時間: 2025-3-25 07:57
Abelard on Grounding in Ontology and Logic,pose what I think is a much closer and certainly more developed anticipation of theories of grounding as dependence in the work of Peter Abelard. Abelard explicitly appeals to grounding in his account of the ontological structure of substance in terms of what we now call tropes. This theory itself t作者: Working-Memory 時間: 2025-3-25 14:06 作者: xanthelasma 時間: 2025-3-25 16:58
Thomas Aquinas, Henry of Ghent, and John Duns Scotus on the Causation of Proper and Inseparable Accabout in themselves their own necessary and inseparable features. In this paper, I propose that self-agency should be understood as an attempt to clarify the relationship between what is necessary but still accidental, and what is essential. I explore this view in the context of two objections again作者: 名義上 時間: 2025-3-25 21:22
Ockham on Priority and Posteriority,as a kind of metaphysical grounding? I offer a close analysis of Ockham’s texts, and I suggest that the answer is probably no. In the course of my analysis, I show that Ockham sparks a debate about priority that was taken up by other fourteenth century thinkers, and I show that Ockham’s view is stri作者: 的闡明 時間: 2025-3-26 01:05 作者: 傳染 時間: 2025-3-26 06:20 作者: condone 時間: 2025-3-26 11:55
,Up in the Air: Buridan’s Principled Rejection of Grounding, are?both free of paradox and ungrounded. This paper outlines and defends Buridan’s approach and suggests that it may give reason to think that ungroundedness is not problematic in semantics or in metaphysics.作者: 中子 時間: 2025-3-26 14:47 作者: freight 時間: 2025-3-26 19:32 作者: 下船 時間: 2025-3-26 21:23 作者: browbeat 時間: 2025-3-27 05:02
Patterns of Software Construction the Trinitarian relationships, as well as mathematical proofs, explanations of human behaviour, and the validity of logical consequences. This volume gathers studies that examine the core philosophical assumptions, motivations, and concepts that lie behind the acceptance of non-causal forms of expl作者: 音樂等 時間: 2025-3-27 08:25 作者: ellagic-acid 時間: 2025-3-27 12:06 作者: Extort 時間: 2025-3-27 14:43 作者: Debrief 時間: 2025-3-27 19:08 作者: ineptitude 時間: 2025-3-28 01:17
Introduction: Grounding Then and Now, the Trinitarian relationships, as well as mathematical proofs, explanations of human behaviour, and the validity of logical consequences. This volume gathers studies that examine the core philosophical assumptions, motivations, and concepts that lie behind the acceptance of non-causal forms of expl作者: chance 時間: 2025-3-28 02:48 作者: Instinctive 時間: 2025-3-28 07:50
Grounding Medieval Consequence,f supposition, personal supposition, a term is taken to stand for individuals falling under it. In this paper, I show that for the earliest . this is false: prior to William of Ockham’s work, personal supposition could also involve descent to concepts or types falling under a term, previously though作者: 牲畜欄 時間: 2025-3-28 13:01 作者: 憤憤不平 時間: 2025-3-28 15:09
Valid on Formal Grounds,aking language to be a natural phenomenon. Robert Kilwardby endeavoured to combine these traditions, but turns out to have taken a stance much closer to Kant, and to have given little importance to linguistic facts in his account of how syllogistic validity and thereby validity in general is grounde作者: Benzodiazepines 時間: 2025-3-28 21:57
Historical-Analytical Studies on Nature, Mind and Action388837.jpg作者: 不透氣 時間: 2025-3-29 00:54 作者: outer-ear 時間: 2025-3-29 06:13
Towards a Calculus of Object Programs,hen grounds his appeal to the theory of the dialectical topics in formulating the truth conditions of conditional propositions and the validity conditions of arguments corresponding to different grounding relationships.作者: 艦旗 時間: 2025-3-29 10:40 作者: 陪審團每個人 時間: 2025-3-29 15:12 作者: Spongy-Bone 時間: 2025-3-29 17:38
,The Incoherence of Ockham’s Ethics,avour of grounding our obligations to obey God on God’s goodness. But whichever of the two we pick, we end up with an incoherent view. Given some things Ockham says, it should not be possible for Ockham’s God to make it right to hate God, yet Ockham also says that this is possible. I see no way to rescue Ockham’s ethics from incoherence.作者: Goblet-Cells 時間: 2025-3-29 21:08 作者: Euphonious 時間: 2025-3-30 01:19 作者: Accord 時間: 2025-3-30 04:30
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16404-2 offer two case studies: one that explores dependence relations in the work of Leibniz, and the other the cosmology of the Chinese Buddhist thinker Fazang. Although I do not defend the claim that there is in fact some work for a theory of Grounding, my argument is highly suggestive of it.作者: 倔強不能 時間: 2025-3-30 11:39 作者: Immunotherapy 時間: 2025-3-30 15:52
,Two Kinds of Grounding? Suárez on Natural Resultance and Foundation,o contributing two intriguing accounts of vital capacities and truth, Suárez’s theories of natural resultance and foundation make an interesting case for the possibility that grounding might not be a single and unified form of metaphysical dependence as contemporary metaphysicians seem to presuppose.作者: 任命 時間: 2025-3-30 17:37
