標題: Titlebook: ; [打印本頁] 作者: lutein 時間: 2025-3-21 17:17
書目名稱Graham Priest on Dialetheism and Paraconsistency影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Graham Priest on Dialetheism and Paraconsistency影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Graham Priest on Dialetheism and Paraconsistency網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Graham Priest on Dialetheism and Paraconsistency網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名
書目名稱Graham Priest on Dialetheism and Paraconsistency被引頻次
書目名稱Graham Priest on Dialetheism and Paraconsistency被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Graham Priest on Dialetheism and Paraconsistency年度引用
書目名稱Graham Priest on Dialetheism and Paraconsistency年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Graham Priest on Dialetheism and Paraconsistency讀者反饋
書目名稱Graham Priest on Dialetheism and Paraconsistency讀者反饋學科排名
作者: 腐蝕 時間: 2025-3-21 21:35
Contradictory Information: Better Than Nothing? The Paradox of the Two Firefighters,eds the values of the “Belnap-Dunn 4-valued Logic” (Truth, Falsity, Neither, Both) into a context of subjective probability generalized to allow for degrees of belief, disbelief, and two kinds of uncertainty—that in which the reasoner has too little information (ignorance) and that in which the reas作者: laparoscopy 時間: 2025-3-22 02:32 作者: SHRIK 時間: 2025-3-22 05:19
eds the values of the “Belnap-Dunn 4-valued Logic” (Truth, Falsity, Neither, Both) into a context of subjective probability generalized to allow for degrees of belief, disbelief, and two kinds of uncertainty—that in which the reasoner has too little information (ignorance) and that in which the reas作者: Gene408 時間: 2025-3-22 11:27 作者: 痛苦一生 時間: 2025-3-22 13:08
Respects for Contradictions,respects of application of one and the same predicate .. Priest rightly claims that one should not mistake true contradictions for an expression of lexical ambiguity. However, he primarily targets cases of homophony for which lexical meanings do not overlap. There exist more subtle forms of equivoca作者: 痛苦一生 時間: 2025-3-22 20:46 作者: 愚笨 時間: 2025-3-22 23:01 作者: bypass 時間: 2025-3-23 04:33 作者: 禍害隱伏 時間: 2025-3-23 06:09 作者: 一再煩擾 時間: 2025-3-23 10:41
Inferential Semantics, Paraconsistency, and Preservation of Evidence,tribution of semantic values to formulas. Meanings are given by the inference rules that, in this case, do not express preservation of truth but rather preservation of availability of a constructive proof. Elsewhere we presented two paraconsistent systems of natural deduction: the Basic Logic of Evi作者: Arbitrary 時間: 2025-3-23 14:36
A Model-Theoretic Analysis of Fidel-Structures for , basic point is that Fidel-structures for . (or .-structures) can be seen as first-order structures over the signature of Boolean algebras expanded by two binary predicate symbols . (for negation) and . (for the consistency connective) satisfying certain Horn sentences. This perspective allows us to作者: Tdd526 時間: 2025-3-23 19:06
Unity, Identity, and Topology: How to Make Donuts and Cut Things in Half,me puzzles concerning mereology and topology. These puzzles suggest that the classical mereotopology needs to be revised. I compare and contrast the Priest-inspired solution with another, based on classical logic, that requires the co-location of boundaries. I suggest that the co-location view shoul作者: 除草劑 時間: 2025-3-23 22:12
Contradictory Information: Better Than Nothing? The Paradox of the Two Firefighters,e useful. We dispute this with what we call the “Paradox of the Two Firefighters.” Suppose you are awakened in your hotel room by a fire alarm. You open the door. You see three possible ways out: left, right, straight ahead. You see two firefighters. One says there is exactly one safe route and it i作者: GAVEL 時間: 2025-3-24 04:31
Variations on the Collapsing Lemma,retations in Priest’s . (.). The source of this construction’s utility is Priest’s ., which guarantees that a formula true in the model . will continue to be true in . (although the formula may . be false in .). In light of the utility and elegance of the Collapsing Lemma, extending variations of th作者: 割讓 時間: 2025-3-24 10:18
Dialetheic Conditional Modal Logic, room in the space of worlds to entertain impossible things. My proposal is to liberate the Leibnizian universe and reinforce the relative aspect of possibility; worlds are possible with respect to some worlds, and impossible for others. The central idea is to isolate relative possibility (Kripke) f作者: PARA 時間: 2025-3-24 13:14
Priest on Negation,ble debate. Several of the issues in play in this area—such as the unique characterization of negation, and the interplay between contrariety and subcontrariety—are broached here by considering some positions taken on them by Graham Priest and assorted critics (in particular, Hartley Slater and Jean作者: 傷心 時間: 2025-3-24 18:52 作者: 使熄滅 時間: 2025-3-24 22:29
ST, LP and Tolerant Metainferences,We assess the extent to which this claim is founded. Building on some results by Girard (Diss Math 136, .) we show that the usual proof-theoretic formulation of propositional ST in terms of the classical sequent calculus without primitive Cut is incomplete with respect to ST-valid metainferences, an作者: 瑣碎 時間: 2025-3-25 02:07
Annotated Natural Deduction for Adaptive Reasoning,und and complete with respect to the propositional fragment of adaptive logics based on .. This appears to be the first tree-format presentation of the standard linear dynamic proof system typical of Adaptive Logics. It offers the advantage of full transparency in the formulation of locally derivabl作者: 不愛防注射 時間: 2025-3-25 06:44
Spirituality and Education: A Frameworkeither A nor?~A, and both A and?~A. We further argue that such systems ought to be three-valued, as any contradiction, A and?~A, should be removed by reconceptualisation of the concepts captured by the system. We follow by considering suitable conditions for the removal of the third value, neither A作者: BET 時間: 2025-3-25 09:04
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02661-4respects of application of one and the same predicate .. Priest rightly claims that one should not mistake true contradictions for an expression of lexical ambiguity. However, he primarily targets cases of homophony for which lexical meanings do not overlap. There exist more subtle forms of equivoca作者: itinerary 時間: 2025-3-25 12:28
Sanjeev P. Sahni,Jeevan Deep Sehgalng that the two views are separated by more than 150 years in which logic has experienced its perhaps most radical revolution, the two accounts are surprisingly close. Both authors admit different meanings of “l(fā)ogic”. In both accounts what could be called a metaphysical concept of logic plays an imp作者: 不持續(xù)就爆 時間: 2025-3-25 19:26 作者: 披肩 時間: 2025-3-25 21:32
Formless Meditation and Sustainability,ies of empirical sciences. Crucial to Priest’s anti-exceptionalism is the existence of ‘data’ that can force the revision of logical theory. He claims that classical logic is inadequate to the available data and, thus, needs to be revised. But what kind of data can overturn classical logic? Priest c作者: curettage 時間: 2025-3-26 01:43 作者: dilute 時間: 2025-3-26 06:32 作者: hieroglyphic 時間: 2025-3-26 11:25 作者: 有毒 時間: 2025-3-26 15:42 作者: 細胞學 時間: 2025-3-26 18:18
e useful. We dispute this with what we call the “Paradox of the Two Firefighters.” Suppose you are awakened in your hotel room by a fire alarm. You open the door. You see three possible ways out: left, right, straight ahead. You see two firefighters. One says there is exactly one safe route and it i作者: 表主動 時間: 2025-3-26 23:56
Indian Psychology and Modern Psychology,retations in Priest’s . (.). The source of this construction’s utility is Priest’s ., which guarantees that a formula true in the model . will continue to be true in . (although the formula may . be false in .). In light of the utility and elegance of the Collapsing Lemma, extending variations of th作者: reptile 時間: 2025-3-27 03:13
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42955-2 room in the space of worlds to entertain impossible things. My proposal is to liberate the Leibnizian universe and reinforce the relative aspect of possibility; worlds are possible with respect to some worlds, and impossible for others. The central idea is to isolate relative possibility (Kripke) f作者: breadth 時間: 2025-3-27 08:42
,Die Spiritualit?t und die Wirklichkeit,ble debate. Several of the issues in play in this area—such as the unique characterization of negation, and the interplay between contrariety and subcontrariety—are broached here by considering some positions taken on them by Graham Priest and assorted critics (in particular, Hartley Slater and Jean作者: 細查 時間: 2025-3-27 11:18
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13065-6upports the semantics that Priest has set out for identity in basic relevant logic and it motivates a version of the Routley–Meyer semantics in which identities can be viewed as constraints on the ternary relation that is used to treat implication.作者: 劇毒 時間: 2025-3-27 15:16
,Die Nüchternheit des Spirituellen,We assess the extent to which this claim is founded. Building on some results by Girard (Diss Math 136, .) we show that the usual proof-theoretic formulation of propositional ST in terms of the classical sequent calculus without primitive Cut is incomplete with respect to ST-valid metainferences, an作者: 易碎 時間: 2025-3-27 20:59
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29957-6und and complete with respect to the propositional fragment of adaptive logics based on .. This appears to be the first tree-format presentation of the standard linear dynamic proof system typical of Adaptive Logics. It offers the advantage of full transparency in the formulation of locally derivabl作者: 木訥 時間: 2025-3-27 22:37
Graham Priest on Dialetheism and Paraconsistency978-3-030-25365-3Series ISSN 2211-2758 Series E-ISSN 2211-2766 作者: 思想流動 時間: 2025-3-28 02:32
Arndt Büssing,Simon Peng-KellerWe provide a short introduction to the volume “Graham Priest on Dialetheism and Paraconsistency.”作者: DALLY 時間: 2025-3-28 09:17
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230240797Modal Meinongianism—the version of Meinongianism invented by Graham Priest—presupposes that we can think about absolute impossibilities. I defend the view that we can, by tidying up a couple of loose ends in Priest’s arguments to this effect from his book ..作者: SMART 時間: 2025-3-28 13:59 作者: Credence 時間: 2025-3-28 16:44 作者: 聯(lián)合 時間: 2025-3-28 19:00 作者: Wernickes-area 時間: 2025-3-29 03:00 作者: 拉開這車床 時間: 2025-3-29 03:18 作者: 開始發(fā)作 時間: 2025-3-29 10:24 作者: 制度 時間: 2025-3-29 13:24
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13065-6upports the semantics that Priest has set out for identity in basic relevant logic and it motivates a version of the Routley–Meyer semantics in which identities can be viewed as constraints on the ternary relation that is used to treat implication.作者: avulsion 時間: 2025-3-29 19:01 作者: 不整齊 時間: 2025-3-29 21:01
Unity, Identity, and Topology: How to Make Donuts and Cut Things in Half,me puzzles concerning mereology and topology. These puzzles suggest that the classical mereotopology needs to be revised. I compare and contrast the Priest-inspired solution with another, based on classical logic, that requires the co-location of boundaries. I suggest that the co-location view should be preferred on abductive grounds.作者: Increment 時間: 2025-3-30 02:21
From Iff to Is: Some New Thoughts on Identity in Relevant Logics,upports the semantics that Priest has set out for identity in basic relevant logic and it motivates a version of the Routley–Meyer semantics in which identities can be viewed as constraints on the ternary relation that is used to treat implication.作者: 變異 時間: 2025-3-30 04:34
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02661-4 mean “. is . in some respects/to some extent, but not in all respects/not to all extent”. I relate this to the strict-tolerant account of vague predicates and outline a variant of the account to cover one-dimensional and multidimensional predicates.作者: set598 時間: 2025-3-30 08:37
Spirituality and Religion in Organizinges in part to dialetheists having focused too heavily on “relevant logics”. It holds out hope for better dialetheic treatments of conditionals (including of how the distinct kinds of conditionals interact), but it also suggests that this is the one area where paracomplete approaches are inevitably better.作者: 勉勵 時間: 2025-3-30 15:38
Assaulting the Spirit: Why Torture Is Wrong,assical logic for formulas taken as true, or false. We extend the idea of proof-theoretic semantics to these logics and argue that the meanings of the connectives in . are given by the fact that its rules are concerned with preservation of the availability of evidence. An analogous idea also applies to ..作者: VICT 時間: 2025-3-30 20:35 作者: 假設(shè) 時間: 2025-3-31 00:13
Respects for Contradictions, mean “. is . in some respects/to some extent, but not in all respects/not to all extent”. I relate this to the strict-tolerant account of vague predicates and outline a variant of the account to cover one-dimensional and multidimensional predicates.作者: 爭論 時間: 2025-3-31 04:20
Paraconsistent or Paracomplete?,es in part to dialetheists having focused too heavily on “relevant logics”. It holds out hope for better dialetheic treatments of conditionals (including of how the distinct kinds of conditionals interact), but it also suggests that this is the one area where paracomplete approaches are inevitably better.作者: AER 時間: 2025-3-31 07:12
Inferential Semantics, Paraconsistency, and Preservation of Evidence,assical logic for formulas taken as true, or false. We extend the idea of proof-theoretic semantics to these logics and argue that the meanings of the connectives in . are given by the fact that its rules are concerned with preservation of the availability of evidence. An analogous idea also applies to ..作者: 現(xiàn)實 時間: 2025-3-31 09:55
Variations on the Collapsing Lemma,lvaged. Among what is shown is that the lemma holds for a strictly more expressive form of . including nullary truth and falsity constants, that any conditional connective that can be added to . without inhibiting the lemma must be theoremhood-preserving, and that the Collapsing Lemma extends to the . logic . as well.作者: avulsion 時間: 2025-3-31 16:05
