標(biāo)題: Titlebook: God, Mind and Logical Space; A Revisionary Approa István Aranyosi Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: 磨損 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 17:15
書目名稱God, Mind and Logical Space影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱God, Mind and Logical Space影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱God, Mind and Logical Space網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱God, Mind and Logical Space網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱God, Mind and Logical Space被引頻次
書目名稱God, Mind and Logical Space被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱God, Mind and Logical Space年度引用
書目名稱God, Mind and Logical Space年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱God, Mind and Logical Space讀者反饋
書目名稱God, Mind and Logical Space讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 官僚統(tǒng)治 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:05
“Life” in Logical Spaceone that is more general and is ontologically non-committing. The view I propose in this chapter goes beyond this disagreement, in that it denies one common assumption, shared by Quineans and Meinongians, according to which existence is an absolute notion. Instead, I propound and argue for the idea 作者: obscurity 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 02:28 作者: 搏斗 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 06:53 作者: 廢止 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 11:46
Afterword: “A God of Garbage”?l Space packs too many irrelevant elements into the concept of God, and even elements that are in contradiction with God’s attribute of perfect goodness. The climax of such heated discussion was in Istanbul, when someone, otherwise not a religious person, exclaimed: “This is a god of garbage!”作者: NOCT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:57
Limnology of the Red Lake, Romaniarding to current orthodoxy, a space of possible worlds, and possibilities are propositions true at some possible world, hence, belonging to logical space. Impossibilities will be propositions that are not true at any possible world; hence, they are not in logical space. Contingencies will be proposi作者: NOCT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 17:55 作者: 權(quán)宜之計(jì) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:51 作者: LIKEN 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 01:47 作者: intimate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 07:36
Texts and Readings in Mathematicsl Space packs too many irrelevant elements into the concept of God, and even elements that are in contradiction with God’s attribute of perfect goodness. The climax of such heated discussion was in Istanbul, when someone, otherwise not a religious person, exclaimed: “This is a god of garbage!”作者: 廢墟 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 12:11 作者: 擁護(hù) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 15:39
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137280329bibliography; existence of god; god; idea; novel; philosophy; space作者: 助記 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 19:25 作者: MOAT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 23:46 作者: 哀悼 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 02:30 作者: 減震 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 10:07
God, Mind and Logical Space978-1-137-28032-9Series ISSN 2634-6176 Series E-ISSN 2634-6184 作者: 進(jìn)入 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 10:54
2634-6176 Overview: The book offers a novel approach to the idea of divinity in guise of a philosophical doctrine called ‘Logical Pantheism‘, according to which the only way to establish the existence of God undeniably is by equating God with Logical Space.978-1-349-44763-3978-1-137-28032-9Series ISSN 2634-6176 Series E-ISSN 2634-6184 作者: indifferent 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 15:06 作者: ABASH 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 20:19
,: Lindsay Anderson and Thorold Dickinson,al considerations. My main point for now will ultimately be that the only way for anything like Anselm’s ontological argument to work, that is, to prove God’s existence a priori, is to accept Logical Pantheism.作者: 碌碌之人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 23:22 作者: 熄滅 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 03:39 作者: 悅耳 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 08:35 作者: municipality 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 14:09 作者: Culmination 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 16:43 作者: MEAN 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 23:42
Historical Precedentseism, resemblances with each of these shouldn’t be surprising. However, the resemblances I want to point out are more specific and regard the original elements of Logical Pantheism, like the plenitude principle of Logical Totalitarianism, which is responsible for the idea of a god that transcends all descriptions and binary oppositions.作者: Fraudulent 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 04:13
Nitrogen in the Pyrenean lakes (Spain),al debate or discussion we say something to the effect that a certain position on a certain issue is possible or makes sense for someone to hold — it is in logical space, we say. We need not agree with that position, but we consider it to make sense, or to be consistent logically. In such contexts w作者: athlete’s-foot 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 06:13
Limnology of the Red Lake, Romania monograph dedicated to the notion of logical space itself, except when it is taken as synonymous with the space of possible worlds. Wittgenstein, who introduced the phrase to philosophy in the ., never defines logical space, yet we get a clear and intuitive idea of what it is supposed to be, namely作者: ORBIT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 08:30
Introduction: , in the Limelight,e debates in the public arena. Debates between theists and atheists who are not philosophers many times end up in overheated and bitter quarrels, because they seldom devote some thought to the very notion of existence. A good example for the debates in the philosophical arena is the issue of whether作者: 拍下盜公款 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:27 作者: COWER 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:00
Inductive Inference of 0L Languagestransistence or transistent causation, the idea of . is that the way things stand within one region, ., will force us to draw conclusions about the entire canonical logical space that . is part of. This phenomenon will be most useful when R is the actual region or actual world, because our knowledge作者: 英寸 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 00:10
,: Lindsay Anderson and Thorold Dickinson,istence of God, due to Anselm of Canterbury. The solution to various problems that arise will be the view that God is identical to Logical Space, a view I call .. The plausibility of Logical Pantheism will further be argued for in the remaining chapters, based on some historical as well as theoretic作者: Bother 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 03:38 作者: 下船 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:37 作者: 友好關(guān)系 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 13:14 作者: Eosinophils 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 16:02 作者: 種子 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 20:15
Introductional debate or discussion we say something to the effect that a certain position on a certain issue is possible or makes sense for someone to hold — it is in logical space, we say. We need not agree with that position, but we consider it to make sense, or to be consistent logically. In such contexts w作者: 警告 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:17
What Is Logical Space? monograph dedicated to the notion of logical space itself, except when it is taken as synonymous with the space of possible worlds. Wittgenstein, who introduced the phrase to philosophy in the ., never defines logical space, yet we get a clear and intuitive idea of what it is supposed to be, namely作者: 聰明 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 04:42
“Life” in Logical Spacee debates in the public arena. Debates between theists and atheists who are not philosophers many times end up in overheated and bitter quarrels, because they seldom devote some thought to the very notion of existence. A good example for the debates in the philosophical arena is the issue of whether作者: 讓步 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 07:26 作者: 手銬 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 12:34
Logical Spillovertransistence or transistent causation, the idea of . is that the way things stand within one region, ., will force us to draw conclusions about the entire canonical logical space that . is part of. This phenomenon will be most useful when R is the actual region or actual world, because our knowledge作者: GRACE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 16:12 作者: aspersion 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 22:21 作者: emission 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 01:58
Solutionsmost important of these is the problem of evil, in its various versions. I will point out that Logical Pantheism is able to deal with both the non-modal and the modal problem of evil. I will focus less on the countless ways in which theist philosophers have tackled this problem, which would need an 作者: 盟軍 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 06:09 作者: 確定方向 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 08:29 作者: engagement 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 14:29 作者: 的闡明 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 18:36
