標(biāo)題: Titlebook: God in One Person; The Case for Non-Inc A. Richard Kingston Book 1993 A. Richard Kingston 1993 Christianity.god.Jesus [打印本頁] 作者: Debilitate 時間: 2025-3-21 17:39
書目名稱God in One Person影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱God in One Person影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱God in One Person網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱God in One Person網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱God in One Person被引頻次
書目名稱God in One Person被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱God in One Person年度引用
書目名稱God in One Person年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱God in One Person讀者反饋
書目名稱God in One Person讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 護(hù)身符 時間: 2025-3-21 23:15
Reconciliation of Father and Son,ain were somehow vital to man’s salvation, that led to the emergence of the church, and, in time, to its full-blooded doctrine of the incarnation. Not surprisingly, B. F. Westcott described it as ‘the historical seal of the Incarnation’.作者: predict 時間: 2025-3-22 01:53 作者: 嚴(yán)厲譴責(zé) 時間: 2025-3-22 06:37
Do the Resurrection Reports Accredit Divinity?ain were somehow vital to man’s salvation, that led to the emergence of the church, and, in time, to its full-blooded doctrine of the incarnation. Not surprisingly, B. F. Westcott described it as ‘the historical seal of the Incarnation’.作者: 和藹 時間: 2025-3-22 10:02 作者: Ondines-curse 時間: 2025-3-22 13:54 作者: Ondines-curse 時間: 2025-3-22 18:49 作者: FECT 時間: 2025-3-22 22:03 作者: 希望 時間: 2025-3-23 05:21
Prism S. Schneider,Mark R. Brinkersive when it comes to that question, if not attempting to have it both ways — on the one hand, accepting the critical findings which in our judgment ruled out an incamational theology, yet, on the other hand, mysteriously reaffirming a near orthodox Christology. Thus Don Cupitt, whilst acknowledging that the early church emerged as作者: 使糾纏 時間: 2025-3-23 08:57
Doron Keshet,Mitchell Bernstein duty. Consequently, any dogmatic claim to absolutism should be replaced by a recognition of pluralism, a recognition that, to some extent at least, there are other paths to God, other traditions in which He may be truly known and worshipped and served.作者: landmark 時間: 2025-3-23 13:32
Krishan L. Duggal,Aurel Bejancuing implication of this belief being, as Ian Wilson put it, that ‘a(chǎn) man who to all appearances was merely an obscure Jewish teacher of two thousand years ago, has in fact been co-creator and coruler of our multimillion galaxy universe throughout its entire existence’.作者: overhaul 時間: 2025-3-23 17:46 作者: 儲備 時間: 2025-3-23 18:49
Peter Helmut Thaller,Felix Frankenberge of the non-incarnational christologies ... one is bound to say that they look pretty vague and thin.’. Even Maurice Wiles refers disparagingly to ‘a(chǎn)n old-fashioned unitarianism which the main body of the church in the past has rejected as something lacking the dynamic of a living faith’..作者: originality 時間: 2025-3-24 01:32
The Narrow Choiceing implication of this belief being, as Ian Wilson put it, that ‘a(chǎn) man who to all appearances was merely an obscure Jewish teacher of two thousand years ago, has in fact been co-creator and coruler of our multimillion galaxy universe throughout its entire existence’.作者: Promotion 時間: 2025-3-24 05:45
Why Would God Become Incarnate? effect some great spiritual deliverance, an act of cosmic salvation or atonement; and finally, to identify himself personally with man in his spiritual pilgrimage and in his struggle against evil and misfortune. Admittedly, there is considerable overlap between these various motivations, but it is still best to examine them separately.作者: 周興旺 時間: 2025-3-24 06:45 作者: glomeruli 時間: 2025-3-24 12:18
978-1-349-13100-6A. Richard Kingston 1993作者: 巡回 時間: 2025-3-24 15:42 作者: appall 時間: 2025-3-24 19:51 作者: LAITY 時間: 2025-3-25 00:03 作者: 人造 時間: 2025-3-25 04:40 作者: 拾落穗 時間: 2025-3-25 11:20
Does God Intervene in History?A quotation from David Brown’s . neatly pinpoints the issue facing us in this chapter:作者: 外星人 時間: 2025-3-25 12:55 作者: alliance 時間: 2025-3-25 18:44
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13098-6Christianity; god; Jesus作者: debble 時間: 2025-3-25 21:08
Krishan L. Duggal,Aurel Bejancurvice of God is supremely influenced by the life and teaching of Jesus is between traditional orthodoxy and unitarianism. To many if not most readers this may appear an outrageous oversimplification of the issue, but I believe there are cogent reasons for restricting the real options to these two, i作者: Kernel 時間: 2025-3-26 02:15
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94728-6luous, in that everyone accepts that the debate about Jesus being God incarnate presupposes belief in the existence and unity of God. Of course it is recognized that the concept of incarnation is also found in some polytheistic faiths, notably within Hinduism, but this wider context is not strictly 作者: 有助于 時間: 2025-3-26 06:08
Yoshihiro Baba,Vladimir A. Rakovation, it appears that none of these provides a strong, let alone a compelling reason to do so; at most, some of them could give rise to a certain constraint on God to become man, but only on the strict presupposition that he is readily and indisputably recognizable as God-man, a condition no repute作者: arrogant 時間: 2025-3-26 09:55 作者: 催眠 時間: 2025-3-26 16:42
Introduction to Lignocellulosic Ethanol,means unimportant, and especially so, if, as considered in Chapter 4, the primary reason for becoming incarnate is to disclose truth through personality, or else to identify with man in his hour of need. Equally, if it is the case, not only that an incarnation is crucial to man’s salvation in genera作者: APEX 時間: 2025-3-26 20:27
,Casus 4 ‘P(l)ak het maar weer lekker in’,e resurrection. For present purposes it is sufficient to understand by the term miracle a very extraordinary event having religious significance, leaving it an open question as to whether this necessarily involves a divine intervention or a violation of a law of nature. More specifically, we are ask作者: 身體萌芽 時間: 2025-3-26 21:23
Reconciliation of Father and Son,tly quoted words of St Paul: ‘If Christ was not raised, then our Gospel is null and void, and so is your faith’ (1 Cor. 15.14). Or as a modern writer has put it: ‘Christianity stands or falls with the reality of the raising of Jesus from the dead by God. In the New Testament there is no faith that d作者: artifice 時間: 2025-3-27 03:35 作者: 刪除 時間: 2025-3-27 07:26 作者: 符合你規(guī)定 時間: 2025-3-27 12:38
Prism S. Schneider,Mark R. Brinkeriples at Caesarea Philippi: ‘Who do you say I am?’ (Mark 8.29). This is especially important because many liberal writers seem to be very vague or evasive when it comes to that question, if not attempting to have it both ways — on the one hand, accepting the critical findings which in our judgment r作者: 委托 時間: 2025-3-27 17:08 作者: Obscure 時間: 2025-3-27 21:09 作者: expunge 時間: 2025-3-28 01:18 作者: adroit 時間: 2025-3-28 05:17 作者: NORM 時間: 2025-3-28 10:05
Why Would God Become Incarnate?ation, it appears that none of these provides a strong, let alone a compelling reason to do so; at most, some of them could give rise to a certain constraint on God to become man, but only on the strict presupposition that he is readily and indisputably recognizable as God-man, a condition no repute作者: 遺棄 時間: 2025-3-28 14:11
How Could God Become Incarnate? and can readily determine the scope of divine action; nevertheless the question is unavoidable. The affirmation that God became man cannot simply be accepted by faith as an unquestionable fact or incomprehensible mystery, neither requiring nor admitting of any rational investigation. Hence, whilst 作者: JAMB 時間: 2025-3-28 16:43 作者: acquisition 時間: 2025-3-28 22:23 作者: RADE 時間: 2025-3-29 00:19 作者: ABIDE 時間: 2025-3-29 05:28 作者: POWER 時間: 2025-3-29 08:44
Does All His Teaching Befit Divinity?orded teaching of Jesus, and indeed it is within the context of a profound appreciation of that teaching in general that we must nevertheless make fairly severe criticisms of some particular aspects of it. Admittedly, it may seem petty-minded to focus entirely on the mistakes or disputable utterance作者: Engulf 時間: 2025-3-29 15:25 作者: Emmenagogue 時間: 2025-3-29 16:20
Why then the Special Focus on Jesus?evelation, clearly entails that no historical faith can claim to be the sole and divinely sanctioned repository of all theological truth and religious duty. Consequently, any dogmatic claim to absolutism should be replaced by a recognition of pluralism, a recognition that, to some extent at least, t作者: oxidize 時間: 2025-3-29 23:27
An Attractive and Viable Faith but also improper, in that it may suggest that the reasoned argument of the preceding chapters is being supplemented by a propagandist recommendation of such faith. The real reason, however, for this brief defence of the spiritual viability of unitarianism is to counter the apparently widespread su作者: 揉雜 時間: 2025-3-30 00:51
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94728-6ef in God, not just in God as ‘Three-in-One’, which is widely questioned or rejected. Hence, despite the fact that the book is predominantly an attempted repudiation of the doctrine of God incarnate, it is appropriate, if not imperative, to preface this with a relatively short statement of the groun作者: decode 時間: 2025-3-30 04:26 作者: 遣返回國 時間: 2025-3-30 12:16 作者: inspired 時間: 2025-3-30 12:23 作者: 無禮回復(fù) 時間: 2025-3-30 18:25
