標題: Titlebook: God Beyond Knowledge; H. A. Hodges,W. D. Hudson Book 1979 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1979 god.knowledg [打印本頁] 作者: 和善 時間: 2025-3-21 19:19
書目名稱God Beyond Knowledge影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱God Beyond Knowledge影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱God Beyond Knowledge網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱God Beyond Knowledge網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名
書目名稱God Beyond Knowledge被引頻次
書目名稱God Beyond Knowledge被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱God Beyond Knowledge年度引用
書目名稱God Beyond Knowledge年度引用學科排名
書目名稱God Beyond Knowledge讀者反饋
書目名稱God Beyond Knowledge讀者反饋學科排名
作者: FORGO 時間: 2025-3-21 21:53 作者: 浮夸 時間: 2025-3-22 00:54
Standard and Non-standard Usages of ‘God’usly is this the case, that one is led to ask why anyone should spend time and effort on theology. It presents itself on a first view as a set of assertions about real existence; but on inspection we find it impossible to understand what it asserts or to discover what right it has to assert it. Why 作者: Acquired 時間: 2025-3-22 05:03 作者: 對待 時間: 2025-3-22 08:55 作者: 難聽的聲音 時間: 2025-3-22 13:01
Not Provenove their point? And first of all: both the contingency argument and argument from design are metaphysical constructions based on a doctrine of the nature of being. Both argue that, since the nature of being is what it is, certain things which undoubtedly exist could not exist if it were not that Go作者: 難聽的聲音 時間: 2025-3-22 19:32 作者: 流出 時間: 2025-3-23 00:04
Shifting Perspectivese as perceptions or quasi-perceptions of divine presence and activity turn out to include nothing which an uncommitted observer could accept as empirical evidence for any definite conclusion; though to one who already believes they naturally appear as confirmatory evidence, and for one already incli作者: receptors 時間: 2025-3-23 04:17 作者: modest 時間: 2025-3-23 07:33 作者: TAG 時間: 2025-3-23 10:22
Choice, No Choice and Self-Choicel justification can be given. Are we then to say that belief or unbelief is a matter of choice? Yes, perhaps, though only in a qualified sense. If it is a choice, there is much to be said about the kind of choice that it is.作者: 言行自由 時間: 2025-3-23 17:55
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-04286-0 defined. It is to be natural theology. This is a term with a recognised meaning, and I intend to keep as close as I can to what the term signifies. It signifies a discussion of the existence and attributes of God, carried on by the exercise of human reason in application to the facts of common expe作者: 暫時中止 時間: 2025-3-23 21:59
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13979-7use of the word. He complains that we can never know definitely what theists mean by what they say, because when faced with awkward arguments or facts of experience (such as the fact of evil in the world, which seems to cast doubt on the alleged goodness of God) they alter the meanings of their word作者: Amylase 時間: 2025-3-24 00:25
Markus Disselkamp,Rudolf Schüllerusly is this the case, that one is led to ask why anyone should spend time and effort on theology. It presents itself on a first view as a set of assertions about real existence; but on inspection we find it impossible to understand what it asserts or to discover what right it has to assert it. Why 作者: 橢圓 時間: 2025-3-24 05:33
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08700-7hinking sets out, and to this it constantly returns to check its findings. God-theory is no part of this structure of empirical knowledge. The concept of God could not even be derived from sense-experience by the processes of empirical thought. Whence then is it derived, and how do people come to a 作者: 心胸狹窄 時間: 2025-3-24 06:36 作者: conceal 時間: 2025-3-24 13:57
Am Anfang stand ein Hausrezept,ove their point? And first of all: both the contingency argument and argument from design are metaphysical constructions based on a doctrine of the nature of being. Both argue that, since the nature of being is what it is, certain things which undoubtedly exist could not exist if it were not that Go作者: 散開 時間: 2025-3-24 16:51
Urban Climate Innovation Laboratoriesness of being somehow in touch with God through their experience. This raises the question of what is called religious experience and the part which it plays in generating and maintaining God-belief. What kind of experience is it? Is it a perception? Is God presented in it as an object, from the per作者: 共棲 時間: 2025-3-24 21:38
William W. Feaster,Michael J. Corleye as perceptions or quasi-perceptions of divine presence and activity turn out to include nothing which an uncommitted observer could accept as empirical evidence for any definite conclusion; though to one who already believes they naturally appear as confirmatory evidence, and for one already incli作者: 我正派 時間: 2025-3-25 01:19 作者: Density 時間: 2025-3-25 05:59
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26224-6e of logical rigour undermined the great scholastic structures, and fifty or a hundred years later strong voices were proclaiming that propositions about God and the soul are matters not of knowledge, but of faith. This did not mean that people had lost their confidence in theism or in Christianity.作者: 抱狗不敢前 時間: 2025-3-25 09:42
S. Schaltegger,A. Braunschweig,P. Zimmermannl justification can be given. Are we then to say that belief or unbelief is a matter of choice? Yes, perhaps, though only in a qualified sense. If it is a choice, there is much to be said about the kind of choice that it is.作者: 不足的東西 時間: 2025-3-25 11:51 作者: Graphite 時間: 2025-3-25 16:41
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13979-7t seems clear that he is doing nothing of the kind. Nothing seems to count, in their eyes, as a refutation of their claims about him. And Flew argues that an assertion of God’s goodness which is elastic enough to cover what we actually find him doing is too elastic to mean anything at all. He challe作者: Phonophobia 時間: 2025-3-25 23:36 作者: 薄荷醇 時間: 2025-3-26 03:03 作者: 輕浮思想 時間: 2025-3-26 04:42 作者: flavonoids 時間: 2025-3-26 08:34
Shifting Perspectivest we see now which we did not see before, namely that its meaningfulness is not just a static meaningfulness, but something dynamic. The soul advances from stage to stage in a process which is variously described as a pilgrim’s journey, or as the ascent of a mountain, or as the climbing of a ladder.作者: Barter 時間: 2025-3-26 16:00
Urban Climate Innovation Laboratoriesception of which empirical concepts can be formed? Is that the real source and origin of God-belief? Or if not, what kind of experience is religious experience and what cognitive value can be claimed for it?作者: 個人長篇演說 時間: 2025-3-26 19:13 作者: 慷慨不好 時間: 2025-3-27 00:53
The Genesis of ‘God’ of God could not even be derived from sense-experience by the processes of empirical thought. Whence then is it derived, and how do people come to a point where they feel justified in asserting the existence of such a being?作者: extinguish 時間: 2025-3-27 02:04 作者: ornithology 時間: 2025-3-27 06:03
Not Proventure of being. Both argue that, since the nature of being is what it is, certain things which undoubtedly exist could not exist if it were not that God exists also. Are we compelled to embrace this conclusion?作者: preservative 時間: 2025-3-27 12:16
Faith and Commitmentcally grounded factual knowledge, can we be sure that that is what it is trying to be? Can we be sure that it is not succeeding in being something else instead? But then what is it that theology tries to be, and perhaps succeeds in being?作者: Granular 時間: 2025-3-27 17:08
The Divided Mind of ,out God and the soul are matters not of knowledge, but of faith. This did not mean that people had lost their confidence in theism or in Christianity. Faith, though it was not knowledge, was a perfectly respectable and reliable state of mind. This view of the matter became accepted and was later a component in the doctrines of the Reformation.作者: Obligatory 時間: 2025-3-27 21:08 作者: Exclaim 時間: 2025-3-28 00:54 作者: 冷淡一切 時間: 2025-3-28 03:34
Am Anfang stand ein Hausrezept,ture of being. Both argue that, since the nature of being is what it is, certain things which undoubtedly exist could not exist if it were not that God exists also. Are we compelled to embrace this conclusion?作者: 顯赫的人 時間: 2025-3-28 09:00
Power and Pitfalls of Social Mediacally grounded factual knowledge, can we be sure that that is what it is trying to be? Can we be sure that it is not succeeding in being something else instead? But then what is it that theology tries to be, and perhaps succeeds in being?作者: 觀察 時間: 2025-3-28 11:45
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26224-6out God and the soul are matters not of knowledge, but of faith. This did not mean that people had lost their confidence in theism or in Christianity. Faith, though it was not knowledge, was a perfectly respectable and reliable state of mind. This view of the matter became accepted and was later a component in the doctrines of the Reformation.作者: VAN 時間: 2025-3-28 17:48
Markus Disselkamp,Rudolf Schüllerusly is this the case, that one is led to ask why anyone should spend time and effort on theology. It presents itself on a first view as a set of assertions about real existence; but on inspection we find it impossible to understand what it asserts or to discover what right it has to assert it. Why is it still kept alive?作者: vasospasm 時間: 2025-3-28 19:16
S. Schaltegger,A. Braunschweig,P. Zimmermannl justification can be given. Are we then to say that belief or unbelief is a matter of choice? Yes, perhaps, though only in a qualified sense. If it is a choice, there is much to be said about the kind of choice that it is.作者: 易彎曲 時間: 2025-3-29 02:42 作者: Folklore 時間: 2025-3-29 04:42
Choice, No Choice and Self-Choicel justification can be given. Are we then to say that belief or unbelief is a matter of choice? Yes, perhaps, though only in a qualified sense. If it is a choice, there is much to be said about the kind of choice that it is.作者: 一夫一妻制 時間: 2025-3-29 11:05
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-85224-3Is the existence of God something which we can claim to know? Or is it merely a belief for which a more or less strong case can be made? Or is it a fantasy for which there is no reasonable case at all?作者: avarice 時間: 2025-3-29 11:34 作者: 物質(zhì) 時間: 2025-3-29 19:16 作者: 苦惱 時間: 2025-3-29 22:24 作者: Melanocytes 時間: 2025-3-30 00:14
Knowledge, Evidence and ‘God’Is the existence of God something which we can claim to know? Or is it merely a belief for which a more or less strong case can be made? Or is it a fantasy for which there is no reasonable case at all?作者: addition 時間: 2025-3-30 07:39 作者: 蟄伏 時間: 2025-3-30 10:06 作者: Loathe 時間: 2025-3-30 13:11 作者: 欲望 時間: 2025-3-30 19:00 作者: 水土 時間: 2025-3-30 20:54
God Beyond Knowledge978-1-349-03732-2Series ISSN 2947-0242 Series E-ISSN 2947-0250 作者: 混合物 時間: 2025-3-31 04:17
2947-0242 Overview: 978-1-349-03732-2Series ISSN 2947-0242 Series E-ISSN 2947-0250
