標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Giving Desert Its Due; Social Justice and L Wojciech Sadurski Book 1985 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1985 Europe.Reichsrechnungsleg [打印本頁] 作者: Remodeling 時間: 2025-3-21 16:55
書目名稱Giving Desert Its Due影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Giving Desert Its Due影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Giving Desert Its Due網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Giving Desert Its Due網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Giving Desert Its Due被引頻次
書目名稱Giving Desert Its Due被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Giving Desert Its Due年度引用
書目名稱Giving Desert Its Due年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Giving Desert Its Due讀者反饋
書目名稱Giving Desert Its Due讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 和平主義者 時間: 2025-3-21 23:05 作者: 大猩猩 時間: 2025-3-22 01:02 作者: 食物 時間: 2025-3-22 06:54
Book 1985 is on full-length scholarly monographs, although some edited volumes of original papers are also included. The Library editors are assisted by an Editorial Advisory Board of internationally renowed scholars. Legal philosophy should not be considered a narrowly circumscribed field.作者: 釘牢 時間: 2025-3-22 10:53
Qihang Shi,Domenic Forte,Mark M. Tehranipoore it is typically within human power to satisfy those needs in the course of social action and, as long as they remain unsatisfied, a person suffers major obstacles in his life, including obstacles to his individual action in satisfying all his other needs. The main difficulty lies, of course, in de作者: 為現(xiàn)場 時間: 2025-3-22 13:47 作者: 為現(xiàn)場 時間: 2025-3-22 18:59 作者: 和平主義 時間: 2025-3-22 23:52 作者: 正面 時間: 2025-3-23 02:09
Hardware Accelerators in Data Centers point. In the case of evaluative concepts such as liberty, democracy and justice, the distinction between defining and advocating is extremely hard to make. Any such definition presupposes certain values and those values should be defended rather than contained in an inevitably arbitrary definition.作者: Cumulus 時間: 2025-3-23 08:59
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57682-0any attempts at justification of various judgments of justice are bound to fail. If, as Alf Ross says, “[t]o invoke justice is the same thing as banging on the table”,. then nothing sensible can be said about justification or defence of the principles of justice.作者: Homocystinuria 時間: 2025-3-23 13:15 作者: 歡呼 時間: 2025-3-23 16:40 作者: NAVEN 時間: 2025-3-23 20:14 作者: 停止償付 時間: 2025-3-23 23:29 作者: Toxoid-Vaccines 時間: 2025-3-24 05:07 作者: prostatitis 時間: 2025-3-24 07:50 作者: altruism 時間: 2025-3-24 11:39 作者: Gossamer 時間: 2025-3-24 17:59 作者: Explicate 時間: 2025-3-24 20:48 作者: 天賦 時間: 2025-3-25 00:14
The Principle of Equilibriumd by John Rawls as ‘reflective equilibrium’ and which has been discussed above.. The principle of justice is a generalization based on particular moral convictions (namely: about the justice of compensatory measures) and then applied to those cases that call for a just arrangement although they do n作者: defile 時間: 2025-3-25 05:36 作者: 上坡 時間: 2025-3-25 09:51 作者: Mhc-Molecule 時間: 2025-3-25 15:31
Preferential Treatment of justice sketched there belongs to what John Rawls calls ‘ideal theory’; it assumes that principles of justice “will be strictly complied with and followed by everyone”.. Ideal theory is always utopian. It is a . utopia in that it provides us with a vision of the world to be sought, yet it is a u作者: ARIA 時間: 2025-3-25 16:43 作者: anesthesia 時間: 2025-3-25 21:46
Beyond Social Justiceed to show that the principles of legal justice cannot stand on their own unless based upon an antecedently accepted set of judgments about social justice. Accordingly, my second aim was to propose and defend a particular conception of social justice.作者: 殘忍 時間: 2025-3-26 01:51
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1938-3tice is, as Hayek suggests, “intellectually disreputable, the mark of demagogy or cheap journalism”.. On the contrary, in our time we are witnessing the growing importance of the concept of social justice, in public consciousness, in political discourse and in philosophical discussions. With growing作者: 凹處 時間: 2025-3-26 07:53 作者: 雪崩 時間: 2025-3-26 12:21
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57682-0any attempts at justification of various judgments of justice are bound to fail. If, as Alf Ross says, “[t]o invoke justice is the same thing as banging on the table”,. then nothing sensible can be said about justification or defence of the principles of justice.作者: 鑲嵌細(xì)工 時間: 2025-3-26 13:20 作者: Subjugate 時間: 2025-3-26 19:10
Alex Yakovlev,Luis Gomes,Luciano Lavagnod by John Rawls as ‘reflective equilibrium’ and which has been discussed above.. The principle of justice is a generalization based on particular moral convictions (namely: about the justice of compensatory measures) and then applied to those cases that call for a just arrangement although they do n作者: right-atrium 時間: 2025-3-26 22:14
Unconstrained Structure and Dynamics,s, when it involves some effort, sacrifice, work, risk, responsibility, inconvenience and so forth, when it is linked with an expenditure of energy and time. It is only this sort of ‘desert’ which should be in justice compensated by social benefits. The general underlying aim of this conception of d作者: paltry 時間: 2025-3-27 02:14
Qihang Shi,Domenic Forte,Mark M. Tehranipoors, not in their own right. To the extent to which unmet, important needs are a burden in one’s life and constitute an important impediment to achieving one’s life-plans, they should be considered as creating a disequilibrium of benefits and burdens. But it is not the existence of . needs that is a p作者: negligence 時間: 2025-3-27 07:09
Zimu Guo,Mark M. Tehranipoor,Domenic Forte of justice sketched there belongs to what John Rawls calls ‘ideal theory’; it assumes that principles of justice “will be strictly complied with and followed by everyone”.. Ideal theory is always utopian. It is a . utopia in that it provides us with a vision of the world to be sought, yet it is a u作者: chisel 時間: 2025-3-27 11:47 作者: Enteropathic 時間: 2025-3-27 15:49
Laser Fault Injection Attack (FIA),ed to show that the principles of legal justice cannot stand on their own unless based upon an antecedently accepted set of judgments about social justice. Accordingly, my second aim was to propose and defend a particular conception of social justice.作者: cipher 時間: 2025-3-27 18:23 作者: 寒冷 時間: 2025-3-27 23:50
Chad R. Meiners,Alex X. Liu,Eric Torngd be, in other words, addressees of the same legal rules? Each legal system contains rules which are addressed to certain classes of citizens (for example, professional groups): do these rules inevitably violate the principle of equality before the law? This is the central question as far as equality before the law is concerned.作者: 不能平靜 時間: 2025-3-28 05:24 作者: STANT 時間: 2025-3-28 10:18 作者: Altitude 時間: 2025-3-28 14:12
1572-4395 the domain of a few isolated scholars in law and philosophy. Hundreds of scholars from diverse fields attend international meetings on the subject. In some universities, large lecture courses of five hundred students or more study it. The primary aim of the Law and Philosophy Library is to present s作者: nerve-sparing 時間: 2025-3-28 15:16
