標題: Titlebook: George Stigler; Enigmatic Price Theo Craig Freedman Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to S [打印本頁] 作者: 不正常 時間: 2025-3-21 19:52
書目名稱George Stigler影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱George Stigler影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱George Stigler網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱George Stigler網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名
書目名稱George Stigler被引頻次
書目名稱George Stigler被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱George Stigler年度引用
書目名稱George Stigler年度引用學科排名
書目名稱George Stigler讀者反饋
書目名稱George Stigler讀者反饋學科排名
作者: gerrymander 時間: 2025-3-21 21:21 作者: 愛管閑事 時間: 2025-3-22 02:45 作者: BUDGE 時間: 2025-3-22 07:34 作者: florid 時間: 2025-3-22 11:03
The Protestant Father as Economist,s thoughts and economic stances. However, they will fail to discover George Stigler’s feelings about preferred breakfast cereals, his taste in headgear and whether or not he chose to spit shine shoes.作者: Pruritus 時間: 2025-3-22 16:39 作者: Pruritus 時間: 2025-3-22 17:29
Stigler on Ricardoishes a logically consistent formulation of the classical theory of value and distribution. Sraffa’s interpretation challenged Stigler’s ideological position, which the latter, however, did not feel the need, or the possibility, to defend.作者: Grandstand 時間: 2025-3-22 23:03 作者: 拖債 時間: 2025-3-23 02:16 作者: 表臉 時間: 2025-3-23 08:34 作者: 內(nèi)部 時間: 2025-3-23 12:18
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-1239-8 Frank Knight, while Stigler prided himself on his break and ultimate detachment from the Chicago figure who dominated the department between the World Wars. In this conversation, Coase discusses his own work, that of George Stigler and even the infamous Coase Theorem.作者: 進步 時間: 2025-3-23 14:01 作者: happiness 時間: 2025-3-23 18:00 作者: Thyroiditis 時間: 2025-3-24 01:42
Reference work 2016Latest editiondrew attention to Smith’s failure to apply self-interested considerations to his theory of policy. We ask whether this apparent gap was Smith’s fault or a misunderstanding of Smith caused by lack of editorial guidance. Smith believed people come to be persuaded of what is in their interests, but that was not apparent from the texts Stigler used.作者: 制造 時間: 2025-3-24 05:36 作者: MAZE 時間: 2025-3-24 07:02 作者: RENAL 時間: 2025-3-24 11:25 作者: follicular-unit 時間: 2025-3-24 15:21
George Stigler as a Reader of Adam Smithdrew attention to Smith’s failure to apply self-interested considerations to his theory of policy. We ask whether this apparent gap was Smith’s fault or a misunderstanding of Smith caused by lack of editorial guidance. Smith believed people come to be persuaded of what is in their interests, but that was not apparent from the texts Stigler used.作者: Sigmoidoscopy 時間: 2025-3-24 21:45 作者: 我悲傷 時間: 2025-3-25 00:28 作者: 不出名 時間: 2025-3-25 06:12
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33228-4e “Virginia School.” Buchanan’s co-founder of Public Choice, Tullock may be more aptly described as . Although at Chicago for much of his career, Coase was a major contributor to the Charlottesville epoch of the Virginia School (1957–1968) and leading figure in the New Institutional School.作者: opalescence 時間: 2025-3-25 10:47 作者: set598 時間: 2025-3-25 11:48 作者: 地名表 時間: 2025-3-25 19:37 作者: 昏迷狀態(tài) 時間: 2025-3-25 23:12
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-1279-4n, at times, an animated conversation over coffee, Blaug explores the role of ideology in economics and the particular stance that George Stigler adopted in this regard. Further consideration is given to the History of Economic Thought, a field that both teacher and pupil embraced, though at times almost surreptitiously.作者: STING 時間: 2025-3-26 03:12
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0003-4hy causes him to misrepresent self-interest as the “bedrock” of the .. Rather, I argue that justice is more fundamental than self-interest, and hence the true “bedrock” of the book. The separation of moral philosophy from economics is Stigler’s most significant failure.作者: Glutinous 時間: 2025-3-26 04:48
Antiretroviral Therapy: When to Start to the ‘Coase Theorem’ becomes clarified, as does the intent of much of his work. Though generally in line with such leading Chicagoans as George Stigler and Milton Friedman in terms of policy, Coase remained firmly at odds with these figures in his approach to economics and his rejection of what he termed ‘blackboard economics’.作者: Obituary 時間: 2025-3-26 11:46 作者: 過渡時期 時間: 2025-3-26 16:07 作者: gout109 時間: 2025-3-26 19:04 作者: GROSS 時間: 2025-3-26 23:37
,Al-Māridīnī, Jamāl al-Dīn, and Badr al-Dīn,role of economies of scale, and the dynamic or evolutionary dimensions of market structures. For Marshall to be a hero to Stigler, some significant elements of Marshall’s economics had to be recreated in such a way as to concur with his own vision of what constituted positive developments in economic analysis.作者: 極深 時間: 2025-3-27 03:16 作者: SEEK 時間: 2025-3-27 05:52
Robert Malow,Consuelo M. Beck-Sagué1–40, 1959), was converted in one night according to his 1988 autobiography. He stated the “Coase theorem” in the third edition of his ., but made it rest only on examples. This chapter examines the meaning of his “Coase theorem”, both from an analytical perspective and as regards its theoretical implications.作者: Substance 時間: 2025-3-27 11:49
George Stigler: Marshall’s Loyal but Faithless Followerrole of economies of scale, and the dynamic or evolutionary dimensions of market structures. For Marshall to be a hero to Stigler, some significant elements of Marshall’s economics had to be recreated in such a way as to concur with his own vision of what constituted positive developments in economic analysis.作者: oxidize 時間: 2025-3-27 14:33
Shattering Hope and Building Empire: Economics the Imperial Science at Chicago, George Stigler and Aaw and economics to better use economic analysis in a decision, undermining the ideal of the state governed by democratic consensus purportedly held by the professoriate, and inventing a certain kind of cost–benefit analysis for evaluating regulatory bodies) were devised for the same political goal: the ascendancy of Chicago neoliberalism.作者: 魯莽 時間: 2025-3-27 21:24
George Stigler, the First Apostle of the “Coase Theorem”1–40, 1959), was converted in one night according to his 1988 autobiography. He stated the “Coase theorem” in the third edition of his ., but made it rest only on examples. This chapter examines the meaning of his “Coase theorem”, both from an analytical perspective and as regards its theoretical implications.作者: 增長 時間: 2025-3-27 22:26 作者: 變量 時間: 2025-3-28 04:30
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56815-1Economics; George Stigler; Chicago School of Economics; Capture theory; Labour Market作者: Deadpan 時間: 2025-3-28 07:25 作者: Thyroiditis 時間: 2025-3-28 11:25 作者: Cacophonous 時間: 2025-3-28 15:59 作者: spinal-stenosis 時間: 2025-3-28 19:51 作者: PSA-velocity 時間: 2025-3-29 00:34 作者: Sleep-Paralysis 時間: 2025-3-29 06:16 作者: LUDE 時間: 2025-3-29 10:06 作者: 要控制 時間: 2025-3-29 12:29 作者: Badger 時間: 2025-3-29 16:38
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-1237-4ithin some professions, as a type of ‘winner-take-all’ tournament. In many ways, that description is perhaps quite applicable to the Chicago department itself, where a fierce, if often friendly, competition raged among faculty members to skate along the cutting edge of research. In this conversation作者: habitat 時間: 2025-3-29 21:18
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5997-2 entrenched economic positions. Consequently, empirical research for such determined advocates like George Stigler and Gardiner Means become more of a convenient rhetorical weapon than the basis for determining answers to posed problems. Supposed evidence in such cases comes to serve more as a means作者: INCUR 時間: 2025-3-30 01:57
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3791-9 at the University of Chicago until the age of 47. This essay will provide a narrative account of George Stigler’s various career transitions from graduate school through his “retirement.” This narrative structure will be employed to bring out what archival material implies about a number of general作者: IOTA 時間: 2025-3-30 06:47
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48373-8It raises the question of why at crucial moments Stigler obviously didn’t seem to give a feck.) At times, his attitude to the field, which greatly benefited from his efforts, parallels the closed-minded perspective of the mechanically gifted but entirely cantankerous Henry Ford. These moments reveal作者: progestogen 時間: 2025-3-30 12:15
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0003-4er’s significant contributions to Smith scholarship as well as Stigler’s use of Adam Smith’s analytical insights in his (Stigler’s own work). The paper argues that while Stigler’s assessment of Smith’s analytical achievements in economics is largely a success, his blindness to Smith’s moral philosop作者: 歡呼 時間: 2025-3-30 13:42
Reference work 2016Latest editionount, ought to help readers appreciate what is distant from their understanding, to appreciate what the author knows but the reader does not. Stigler drew attention to Smith’s failure to apply self-interested considerations to his theory of policy. We ask whether this apparent gap was Smith’s fault 作者: 口味 時間: 2025-3-30 17:10
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4425-0n in terms of marginalist theory. This confirms Piero Sraffa’s observation that by the end of the nineteenth century the analytical structure, content and genuine significance of the classical theory had been “submerged and forgotten”. However, Stigler’s textual acuteness allows him to discover irri
