標(biāo)題: Titlebook: George III; An Essay in Monarchy G. M. Ditchfield Book 2002 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2002 empire.Euro [打印本頁] 作者: introspective 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 17:59
書目名稱George III影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱George III影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱George III網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱George III網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱George III被引頻次
書目名稱George III被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱George III年度引用
書目名稱George III年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱George III讀者反饋
書目名稱George III讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: LUMEN 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 21:11 作者: 合唱隊(duì) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:42
Dorothee Gronostay,Sabine Manzelch he inherited in 1760 was that of a major European ruler. Under the terms of the personal union with Hanover which dated from 1714 he exercised an Electoral vote in the Diet of the Holy Roman Empire, of which he held the nominal office of Arch-Treasurer from 1778. By descent and, from 1761, by mar作者: Free-Radical 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 08:21 作者: 演繹 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:34 作者: BRAND 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 13:45
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-88728-3olved no political or cultural theory of empire. He was well aware, however, of his imperial responsibilities. As a leading scholar has recently noted, ‘Monarchy was at the legal core of the empire’.. The nearest which the empire could claim to a uniting bond was not any kind of common citizenship, 作者: BRAND 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:27 作者: Condense 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 22:18 作者: 迷住 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 02:02
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599437empire; Europe; history; history of literature; monarchy; nature; politics; present; religion作者: wangle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 06:20
Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2002作者: 試驗(yàn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 10:58 作者: intellect 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 14:13
nt a rounded appreciation of one of the most important and controversial themes in British history. It examines the historical reputation of George III, his role as a European figure and his religious convictions, and offers a discussion of the domestic and imperial policies with which he was associated.978-0-230-59943-7作者: 白楊魚 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 21:35 作者: 粘 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 22:26
Christopher Hempel,David Jahr,Dieter Koop (1701) George III was required to be a member of the Church of England. He was by law the head of the Church and of the wider Anglican communion. Article 37 of the Church’s Articles of Religion accorded to the King the ‘chief Government’ over ‘a(chǎn)ll Estates of this Realm, whether they be Ecclesiastical or Civil’.作者: Confound 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 03:31
The Religion of George III, (1701) George III was required to be a member of the Church of England. He was by law the head of the Church and of the wider Anglican communion. Article 37 of the Church’s Articles of Religion accorded to the King the ‘chief Government’ over ‘a(chǎn)ll Estates of this Realm, whether they be Ecclesiastical or Civil’.作者: NADIR 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 09:43
Jürgen Weber,Bianca Willauer,Utz Sch?fferich diverted attention from the microscopic analysis of political elites associated with the research of Sir Lewis Namier, as well as from broader examinations of the acquisition, retention and loss of political power on the part of those elites. Its spirit was encapsulated by John Cannon’s review of Brooke’s biography:作者: ALIEN 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 12:25 作者: pacifist 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 18:32 作者: Small-Intestine 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 19:59
Introduction,in 1998, while two excellent biographies of the King, by John Brooke and by Stanley Ayling, appeared in 1972.. There has also been a series of entertaining accounts of various members of the King’s family. . However, there have been far fewer analytical studies of George III as King, apart from E. A作者: 火花 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 02:38 作者: mosque 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 05:29
George III as a European Figure,ch he inherited in 1760 was that of a major European ruler. Under the terms of the personal union with Hanover which dated from 1714 he exercised an Electoral vote in the Diet of the Holy Roman Empire, of which he held the nominal office of Arch-Treasurer from 1778. By descent and, from 1761, by mar作者: Stagger 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 08:49
,George III and British Politics, 1760–1784,e had received had been almost entirely favourable, and focused mainly upon his virtuous youth and upon the philanthropic interests which he inherited from his father, Prince Frederick. He was reported, for instance, to have contributed ￡200 for the victims of a fire in King Street.. He visited the 作者: 眉毛 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 13:12
The Religion of George III, the throne on 18 November 1760 he proclaimed the protection of the ‘Protestant Interest’ in Europe as a major British objective in the Seven Years’ War;. he ended his reign as a champion of the Protestant constitution with his successful resistance to Catholic Emancipation. By the Act of Settlement作者: 排他 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 17:56
George III and Empire,olved no political or cultural theory of empire. He was well aware, however, of his imperial responsibilities. As a leading scholar has recently noted, ‘Monarchy was at the legal core of the empire’.. The nearest which the empire could claim to a uniting bond was not any kind of common citizenship, 作者: Formidable 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 22:00 作者: Hangar 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 01:25
Conclusion,in 1760 at the peak of his political fortunes, amid the victory celebrations of the Seven Years’ War. George III died in the midst of the national discontent which had given rise to the march of the ‘Blan-keteers’, the Pentrich rising, Peterloo and the ‘Six Acts’. Yet George III was mourned with far作者: 危機(jī) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 08:22 作者: Detoxification 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 10:44
Dorothee Gronostay,Sabine Manzels of primary, albeit not exclusive, importance in the conduct of foreign policy. Although ministers in cabinet, both Houses of Parliament and (to a lesser extent and usually in a negative direction) public opinion all wielded influence, the scope for initiatives on the part of the Crown were greater作者: Abutment 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 13:21 作者: Dissonance 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:40
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-88728-3eorge III before denouncing him as ‘A Prince whose character is... marked by every act which may define a Tyrant [and who] is unfit to be the ruler of a free People’.. This was a view shared by a significant number of the King’s domestic opponents. On the other hand, the King was seen by many Americ作者: Conscientious 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 22:12 作者: neutral-posture 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 02:35 作者: otic-capsule 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 07:47 作者: 不透明 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 12:08
George III as a European Figure,s of primary, albeit not exclusive, importance in the conduct of foreign policy. Although ministers in cabinet, both Houses of Parliament and (to a lesser extent and usually in a negative direction) public opinion all wielded influence, the scope for initiatives on the part of the Crown were greater作者: 全等 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 13:57
,George III and British Politics, 1760–1784,cester House, and had expressed in private firm views as to the ways in which he hoped to change the character of British politics, his political profile had not been a high one. He had formally taken his seat in the House of Lords as Prince of Wales on 13 November 1759, but had otherwise made no ap作者: Inflated 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 20:37
George III and Empire,eorge III before denouncing him as ‘A Prince whose character is... marked by every act which may define a Tyrant [and who] is unfit to be the ruler of a free People’.. This was a view shared by a significant number of the King’s domestic opponents. On the other hand, the King was seen by many Americ作者: Extort 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:10
,The Changing Nature of the British Monarchy, 1784–1810,-1760s there is evidence that George Ill’s early popularity had faded and that — especially in London — he had become a much more controversial figure. Only with the general election of 1784 was it clear that the King had recovered much of the reputation for virtue which he brought to the throne in 作者: Ingest 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 05:00
Conclusion,lly unknown to the vast majority of his people. Hence, Wraxall added, ‘his enemies endeavoured to represent him, most unjustly, as affecting the state of an Asiatic prince, scarcely ever visible except on the terrace at Windsor or in the circle at a levee’.. Accordingly, legends as to his arbitrary
