標(biāo)題: Titlebook: General Theory of Knowledge; Moritz Schlick Book 1974 Springer-Verlag Wien 1974 calculus.knowledge.nature.perception.time [打印本頁] 作者: NK871 時間: 2025-3-21 16:29
書目名稱General Theory of Knowledge影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱General Theory of Knowledge影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱General Theory of Knowledge網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱General Theory of Knowledge網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱General Theory of Knowledge被引頻次
書目名稱General Theory of Knowledge被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱General Theory of Knowledge年度引用
書目名稱General Theory of Knowledge年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱General Theory of Knowledge讀者反饋
書目名稱General Theory of Knowledge讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 終端 時間: 2025-3-21 22:35 作者: liaison 時間: 2025-3-22 00:58 作者: 異端邪說下 時間: 2025-3-22 07:53
The Analytic Character of Rigorous Inferenceve, of those who do not wish to see the exact inferences in the sciences come under the jurisdiction of the syllogism. For it is a well-known fact that philosophy long ago passed a very harsh judgment on the value of syllogistic inference for human knowledge.作者: EXUDE 時間: 2025-3-22 10:26
A Skeptical Consideration of Analysisogic, the outcome is absolutely correct, that is, it is in accordance with the assumptions from which it is inferred. It has to be correct for the simple reason that it says nothing different from what these assumptions assert; it says the . that is already contained in them.作者: 歡笑 時間: 2025-3-22 14:38 作者: 歡笑 時間: 2025-3-22 17:51
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7129-9. At the same time, concepts appear in all judgments, so that judgments in turn seem to be composed of and to presuppose concepts. Concepts and judgments are thus correlative. They imply one another; the one cannot exist without the other.作者: judicial 時間: 2025-3-22 23:09 作者: 斷言 時間: 2025-3-23 05:16
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04245-8In acts of thought, however, the two realms must somehow come into connection or communication with one another; and thus the problem consists precisely in giving an account of how this is possible. The metaphorical, Platonist solution, according to which ideas are simply “intuited” by our mind, no longer satisfies us today.作者: 一夫一妻制 時間: 2025-3-23 07:38
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9809-5 our results in still clearer view by seeking to eliminate once and for all those fundamental errors that have constantly cast shadows across these problems and have obscured the ideas about consciousness entertained by philosophers, both ancient and modern.作者: META 時間: 2025-3-23 23:49 作者: Ondines-curse 時間: 2025-3-24 04:19
On Self-Evidence our results in still clearer view by seeking to eliminate once and for all those fundamental errors that have constantly cast shadows across these problems and have obscured the ideas about consciousness entertained by philosophers, both ancient and modern.作者: 實施生效 時間: 2025-3-24 07:34 作者: 抓住他投降 時間: 2025-3-24 12:40 作者: ACME 時間: 2025-3-24 15:30
Book 1974 Mario Bunge From the Preface to the First Edition It may seem odd that aseries of works devoted to the natural sciences should indude - indeed begin with - a volume on phi- losophy. Today, of course, it is generally agreed that philosophy and natural science are perfectly compatible. But to grant t作者: 陳列 時間: 2025-3-24 19:33 作者: Inveterate 時間: 2025-3-24 23:36
General Theory of Knowledge978-3-7091-3099-5Series ISSN 0075-9104 作者: 巧思 時間: 2025-3-25 03:26
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-3099-5calculus; knowledge; nature; perception; time作者: Dysplasia 時間: 2025-3-25 09:18
Example Double Tube Heat Exchanger, which such movements depended. They even went so far as to conclude that man was quite incapable of moving his body by himself. Whenever he wished to perform some movement, they believed, a higher power had to come to his aid and do it for him.作者: interior 時間: 2025-3-25 11:55
Anisotropic Cartesian Grid Adaptationby some kind of definition of the area that is to be studied. For we must be quite clear at the outset as to what we are going to deal with, what questions we hope to answer. Hence the first thing we must ask ourselves is: What actually is knowledge?作者: gruelling 時間: 2025-3-25 17:32 作者: Mingle 時間: 2025-3-25 21:37
Takashi Yabe,Youichi Ogata,Kenji Takizawaertain about it. One might be tempted to say — and many logicians have indeed said — that a concept is simply an image with a strictly fixed content. As we have seen, however, there are no such entities in psychological reality because all images are to one degree or another vague. One might of cour作者: coagulation 時間: 2025-3-26 02:26
Computational Fluid Dynamics 2008onsiderable progress. By using defined concepts, scientific knowledge raises itself far above the level of knowing in everyday life. Whenever we have at our disposal suitably defined concepts, knowledge becomes possible in a form practically free from doubt.作者: LIKEN 時間: 2025-3-26 04:20
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17884-9 It came from research in a particular science, to whose needs logic, in this instance as in most others, did not adapt itself until later. In the nature of the case, the only science that could forge ahead to a rigorous formulation of our problem was one so constituted that absolute certainty had t作者: Ingratiate 時間: 2025-3-26 11:17 作者: 壟斷 時間: 2025-3-26 14:28 作者: 閑蕩 時間: 2025-3-26 18:07 作者: grudging 時間: 2025-3-26 22:57
https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28807-4 criticism that attacks the actual import and usefulness of this kind of inference. This, perhaps, is what motivates the efforts, referred to just above, of those who do not wish to see the exact inferences in the sciences come under the jurisdiction of the syllogism. For it is a well-known fact tha作者: 粘土 時間: 2025-3-27 01:30 作者: CUMB 時間: 2025-3-27 06:30
Mark Berg,Otfried Cheong,Mark Overmarsy fulfilled? It would be vain to hope for any “proof” of this; proofs would only offer new points for radical skepticism to attack. No. The only thing that can help us is to present something that is exempt in advance from any doubt, that is, a fact. If there is such a fact, then the skepticism that作者: 征稅 時間: 2025-3-27 09:47
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04245-8pon strange paths. The insight that concepts and other logical structures are not mental realities has led these philosophers to ascribe a special kind of “being” to them, and like Plato to counterpose the realm of real being and the realm of ideal being as two quite different and separate spheres. 作者: 炸壞 時間: 2025-3-27 15:12 作者: delta-waves 時間: 2025-3-27 20:06 作者: 推測 時間: 2025-3-27 22:07 作者: Wallow 時間: 2025-3-28 03:15
Huilin Lu,Dimitri Gidaspow,Shuyan WangWhat is our purpose in coordinating concepts to objects? The answer has already been given: to be able to make judgments about objects. But why do we make judgments about objects, why do we coordinate judgments as signs to facts? To answer this, we need only make clear to ourselves what end is served generally by the use of signs.作者: Iatrogenic 時間: 2025-3-28 07:06
P. U. Foscolo,L. G. Gibilaro,R. Di FeliceIt is now appropriate to ask why men really seek knowledge. Why do we devote our lives to this curious occupation of constantly searching out sameness in difference? Why do we strive to designate the rich manifold of the universe by means of only those concepts that are built up from a minimum number of elementary concepts?作者: 原告 時間: 2025-3-28 12:57
HLA Polymorphism and Disease SusceptibilityScience is a system of truths, not a mere collection.作者: 冥界三河 時間: 2025-3-28 16:27
Knowing by Means of ImagesTo know is to re-cognize . or rediscover .. And to rediscover is to equate . is known with . it is known. We must now clarify this act of equating if we are to deepen our insight into the nature of knowing.作者: ARY 時間: 2025-3-28 21:18
Judging and KnowingWith this we return to the analysis of the cognitive process. For we have now gone far enough in our study of the means required for knowing — concepts and judgments — to be able to penetrate more deeply into the nature of knowledge itself.作者: DIS 時間: 2025-3-29 02:20
What is Truth?What is our purpose in coordinating concepts to objects? The answer has already been given: to be able to make judgments about objects. But why do we make judgments about objects, why do we coordinate judgments as signs to facts? To answer this, we need only make clear to ourselves what end is served generally by the use of signs.作者: hypertension 時間: 2025-3-29 03:56
On the Value of KnowledgeIt is now appropriate to ask why men really seek knowledge. Why do we devote our lives to this curious occupation of constantly searching out sameness in difference? Why do we strive to designate the rich manifold of the universe by means of only those concepts that are built up from a minimum number of elementary concepts?作者: 縮短 時間: 2025-3-29 07:45
The Interconnectedness of KnowledgeScience is a system of truths, not a mere collection.作者: DRILL 時間: 2025-3-29 11:52 作者: Ordeal 時間: 2025-3-29 18:31 作者: KIN 時間: 2025-3-29 22:40
David W. F. Standingford,Shaun A. Forthnced with a totally different stress. Yet we shall soon see that ‘know’ does not take on a new, special meaning in science, that knowing in science and knowing in ordinary life are essentially the same. The only difference is that in science and philosophy the loftier aim and subject-matter of the cognitive process lend it a greater dignity.作者: BRACE 時間: 2025-3-30 00:50 作者: 正式通知 時間: 2025-3-30 07:47
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9820-0ual or “ideal” sciences. It emerges all the more sharply, however, in the empirical or “real” sciences. In these sciences it has a fundamental importance; and a prime task of epistemology is to make use of this distinction in order to clarify the kinds of validity possessed by various judgments.作者: 不理會 時間: 2025-3-30 08:55 作者: Permanent 時間: 2025-3-30 14:42
The Meaning of the Theory of Knowledge which such movements depended. They even went so far as to conclude that man was quite incapable of moving his body by himself. Whenever he wished to perform some movement, they believed, a higher power had to come to his aid and do it for him.作者: Obstreperous 時間: 2025-3-30 17:07
Knowing in Everyday Lifeby some kind of definition of the area that is to be studied. For we must be quite clear at the outset as to what we are going to deal with, what questions we hope to answer. Hence the first thing we must ask ourselves is: What actually is knowledge?作者: Lyme-disease 時間: 2025-3-31 00:27 作者: 關(guān)節(jié)炎 時間: 2025-3-31 02:30 作者: habile 時間: 2025-3-31 06:32
Definitions, Conventions and Empirical Judgmentsual or “ideal” sciences. It emerges all the more sharply, however, in the empirical or “real” sciences. In these sciences it has a fundamental importance; and a prime task of epistemology is to make use of this distinction in order to clarify the kinds of validity possessed by various judgments.作者: PALL 時間: 2025-3-31 09:16
What Knowledge is NotIs knowledge nothing more than a mere designating? If so, does the human mind not remain forever a stranger to and remote from the things, processes and relations it wishes to know? Can it never effect a more intimate union with the objects of this world, of which it too is a member?作者: 男學(xué)院 時間: 2025-3-31 13:30
Book 1974and the sciences, and in so doing make dear at the outset the method to be followed in this book. It is my view - which I have already expressed elsewhere and which I never tire of repeating - that philosophy is not aseparate science to be placed alongside of or above the individual disciplines. Rat作者: countenance 時間: 2025-3-31 19:41 作者: 說明 時間: 2025-3-31 23:43
The Meaning of the Theory of Knowledge which such movements depended. They even went so far as to conclude that man was quite incapable of moving his body by himself. Whenever he wished to perform some movement, they believed, a higher power had to come to his aid and do it for him.作者: AWL 時間: 2025-4-1 05:30
Knowing in Everyday Lifeby some kind of definition of the area that is to be studied. For we must be quite clear at the outset as to what we are going to deal with, what questions we hope to answer. Hence the first thing we must ask ourselves is: What actually is knowledge?作者: A保存的 時間: 2025-4-1 07:30
Knowing in Sciencenced with a totally different stress. Yet we shall soon see that ‘know’ does not take on a new, special meaning in science, that knowing in science and knowing in ordinary life are essentially the same. The only difference is that in science and philosophy the loftier aim and subject-matter of the c作者: Infinitesimal 時間: 2025-4-1 11:08
Knowing by Means of Conceptsertain about it. One might be tempted to say — and many logicians have indeed said — that a concept is simply an image with a strictly fixed content. As we have seen, however, there are no such entities in psychological reality because all images are to one degree or another vague. One might of cour作者: 1FAWN 時間: 2025-4-1 15:33 作者: 紡織品 時間: 2025-4-1 18:41 作者: LAVE 時間: 2025-4-2 01:35
The Nature of Judgmentsexplore the nature of .. For, implicit definitions determine concepts by virtue of the fact that certain axioms — which themselves are judgments — hold with regard to these concepts; thus such definitions make concepts depend on judgments. All other types of definitions likewise consist of judgments作者: Generalize 時間: 2025-4-2 05:59 作者: Etching 時間: 2025-4-2 10:28
What Knowledge is NotIs knowledge nothing more than a mere designating? If so, does the human mind not remain forever a stranger to and remote from the things, processes and relations it wishes to know? Can it never effect a more intimate union with the objects of this world, of which it too is a member?作者: 侵略者 時間: 2025-4-2 11:34
The Analytic Character of Rigorous Inference criticism that attacks the actual import and usefulness of this kind of inference. This, perhaps, is what motivates the efforts, referred to just above, of those who do not wish to see the exact inferences in the sciences come under the jurisdiction of the syllogism. For it is a well-known fact tha
