標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy; Ondrej Majer,Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen,Tero Tulenheim Book 2009 Springer Science+Business Me [打印本頁] 作者: 租期 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 17:06
書目名稱Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy被引頻次
書目名稱Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy年度引用
書目名稱Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy讀者反饋
書目名稱Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: facetious 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 23:16
The Problem of Determinacy of Infinite Games from an Intuitionistic Point of Viewrns out that every subset of a space, where player . has, for each one of his moves, no more than a finite number of alternative possibilities while player . perhaps has infinitely many choices, is determinate in the proposed sense from the viewpoint of player ..作者: Dedication 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 03:36
Book 2009hodo- gies over what have been perceived as pretty disparate logical ‘systems’, or else merely an assortment of formal and mathematical ‘a(chǎn)pproaches’ to phi- sophical inquiry. This development has largely been fueled by an increasing dissatisfaction to what has earlier been taken to be a straightforw作者: 失敗主義者 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 05:33 作者: CODA 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 09:29 作者: 星星 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 13:14 作者: 星星 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 18:59 作者: single 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 22:11
Analysis of Data from an ,-of-1 Trial,lief formation practices implicit in epistemic characterization theorems, however, disregard all information about players except what can be found in the game itself. Such a practice of belief formation is implausible.作者: Ccu106 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 04:20 作者: 紀(jì)念 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 09:04
Why Play Logical Games?ainst Hintikka games, I focus on Lorenzen‘s attempt at providing a direct foundation for his game rules in the life-world, showing some of the difficulties inherent to that project. I then propose an alternative based on the theory of assertions developed by Dummett and Brandom.作者: 寬容 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 12:53
On The Narrow Epistemology of Game-Theoretic Agentslief formation practices implicit in epistemic characterization theorems, however, disregard all information about players except what can be found in the game itself. Such a practice of belief formation is implausible.作者: 騎師 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 15:48
A Strategic Perspective on if Games IF semantic games that violate the principle of perfect recall. We explore the strategic framework by replacing the notion of Nash equilibrium by other solution concepts, that are inspired by weakly dominant strategies and iterated removal thereof, charting the expressive power of IF logic under the resulting semantics.作者: 宇宙你 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 21:50
Towards Evaluation Games for Fuzzy Logicsnlike the standard semantics, it can deal with the so-called non-safe models. The second kind of semantics makes explicit the intuition about fuzzy logics as logics of partial truth and provides a semantics in the form of a bargaining game. Finally, a basic kind of logic of informational independence of a Hintikka-Sandu style is introduced.作者: 領(lǐng)帶 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 22:37 作者: 狗舍 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 04:32
Ondrej Majer,Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen,Tero TulenheimThe first book to collect multidisciplinary research on game-theoretic methods in logic, language and philosophy.Brings forward philosophical aspects of games in relation to logic and language, unlike作者: 災(zāi)難 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 09:48 作者: POWER 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 13:27 作者: 搖晃 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 16:09 作者: OCTO 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 23:02 作者: Feckless 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 00:13 作者: multiply 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 06:59 作者: voluble 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 10:36
Nonlinear Analysis of Plane Frames,renz, and the game-theoretical semantics of Jaakko Hintikka. For classical proposi-tional logic and for classical first-order logic, an exact connection between ‘in-tuitionistic dialogues with hypotheses’ and semantic games is established. Various questions of a philosophical nature are also shown t作者: 手段 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 12:51 作者: colony 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 16:00
Analysis of Machining and Machine Toolssjunction occurring in the classical notion of determinacy constructively, even finite games are not always determinate. We therefore suggest an intuitionistically different notion of determinacy and prove that every subset of Cantor space is determinate in the proposed sense. Our notion is biased a作者: 儲(chǔ)備 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 21:38
Gilbert Levin,Edward B. RobertsAbstract The aim of this paper is to investigate a very general problem of (radical) interpretation in terms of a simple coordination game: the .. We show how, within our mathematical framework, the solution concept for the conformity game does indeed provide an algorithmic procedure facilitating ., in the sense of Davidson.作者: 有危險(xiǎn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 00:34
Analysis of Kinetic Reaction MechanismsA dialogical version of (modal) epistemic logic is outlined, with an intuitionistic variant. Another version of dialogical epistemic logic is then provided by means of the S4 mapping of intuitionistic logic. Both systems cast new light on the relationship between intuitionism, modal logic and dialogical games.作者: UTTER 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 08:12 作者: 移植 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 12:32 作者: Irrigate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:56
Implicit Versus Explicit Knowledge in Dialogical LogicA dialogical version of (modal) epistemic logic is outlined, with an intuitionistic variant. Another version of dialogical epistemic logic is then provided by means of the S4 mapping of intuitionistic logic. Both systems cast new light on the relationship between intuitionism, modal logic and dialogical games.作者: Lamina 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 18:04 作者: Expand 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 22:05
Biological sources of reduced oxygen species deal of attention has been paid to truth conditions, the contributions of quantifiers to the discourse have been little studied. This paper seeks to rectify this by developing a set of game rules that account both for the truth conditional and the discourse contributions of quantified expressions.作者: 不整齊 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 04:25
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7685-9e game is generalized to other fuzzy logics and linked to recent results in proof theory. We argue that these results allow one to place .-norm based fuzzy logics in a common framework with supervaluation as a theory of vagueness.作者: tariff 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 08:13 作者: 使迷醉 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 12:41 作者: dissolution 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 14:00 作者: Defraud 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 20:47
978-90-481-8115-5Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009作者: Chauvinistic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 22:40 作者: 假設(shè) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 05:59
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77148-4 the human player of the cognitive game has no general stake in accepting undertakings that he has no chance of making good on..Throughout its long history, the traditional fallacies have been characterized as mistakes that are attractive, universal and incorrigible. In the present essay, we want to作者: Largess 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 06:23
Book 2009ntensive research into the intricacies of logical systems and methodologies performed over the recent years. The present book suggests one such peculiar but very unrestrained meth- ological perspective over the eld of logic and its applications in mathematics, language or computation: games. An alle作者: 哄騙 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 12:42
Fallacies as Cognitive Virtues the human player of the cognitive game has no general stake in accepting undertakings that he has no chance of making good on..Throughout its long history, the traditional fallacies have been characterized as mistakes that are attractive, universal and incorrigible. In the present essay, we want to作者: BOOST 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 15:58 作者: Neutral-Spine 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 18:57
Why Play Logical Games? the lack of a convincing philosophical account of logical games, what it means to play them, for the proponent to win, etc., pointedly raised by Wilfrid Hodges as the ‘Dawkins question’. In this paper, I critically examine two available answers: after a brief discussion of an argument by Tennant ag作者: novelty 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 23:56
On The Narrow Epistemology of Game-Theoretic Agentsanations shows that they do not conform to the belief-desire framework of action explanation. Epistemic characterization theorems (specifying sufficient conditions for game-theoretic solution concepts to obtain) are argued to be the canonical way to make game theory conform to that framework. The be作者: Jingoism 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 03:14
Fallacies as Cognitive Virtuesric mission. In so doing, it has taken on in a quite general way a game-theoretic character, precisely as it was with the theory of syllogistic refutation in the . and ., where Aristotle develops winning strategies for disputations. The approach that the present authors take toward the logic of prac作者: 熱心助人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 11:19
A Strategic Perspective on if Gamesimperfect information. In this paper we set up a strategic framework for the evaluation of IF logic à la Hintikka and Sandu. We show that the traditional semantic interpretation of IF logic can be characterized in terms of Nash equilibria. We note that moving to the strategic framework we get rid of作者: 奇思怪想 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 14:15
Towards Evaluation Games for Fuzzy Logicszation of the evaluation games for classical logic. It is shown that it provides an interesting contribution to the model theory of fuzzy logics as, unlike the standard semantics, it can deal with the so-called non-safe models. The second kind of semantics makes explicit the intuition about fuzzy lo作者: LOPE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 19:09
Games, Quantification and Discourse Structure deal of attention has been paid to truth conditions, the contributions of quantifiers to the discourse have been little studied. This paper seeks to rectify this by developing a set of game rules that account both for the truth conditional and the discourse contributions of quantified expressions.
