標題: Titlebook: Galileo and the Art of Reasoning; Rhetorical Foundatio Maurice A. Finocchiaro Book 1980 D. Reidel Publishing Company Dordrecht, Holland 198 [打印本頁] 作者: calcification 時間: 2025-3-21 17:04
書目名稱Galileo and the Art of Reasoning影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Galileo and the Art of Reasoning影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Galileo and the Art of Reasoning網(wǎng)絡公開度
書目名稱Galileo and the Art of Reasoning網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名
書目名稱Galileo and the Art of Reasoning被引頻次
書目名稱Galileo and the Art of Reasoning被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Galileo and the Art of Reasoning年度引用
書目名稱Galileo and the Art of Reasoning年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Galileo and the Art of Reasoning讀者反饋
書目名稱Galileo and the Art of Reasoning讀者反饋學科排名
作者: 兩種語言 時間: 2025-3-21 20:59
Staken (withdrawing) van behandeling,replaced, by an observational, historical, introspective approach; the new rhetoric is valuable for the generality of its aim but needs to be made more concrete, vis-a-vis both the materials of reasoning and logical analysis. Let us continue our critical review of available approaches.作者: 誘騙 時間: 2025-3-22 03:23 作者: 停止償付 時間: 2025-3-22 06:57
Emotion, Aesthetics, and Persuasion: The Rhetorical Force of Galileo’s Argumenthe book from this rhetorical point of view is a type of intellectual content, but one that plays upon feelings and emotions, either directly and explicitly by verbal expressions that have the desired emotive effect, or else indirectly and implicitly by emphatic identification with what is explicitly said or done.作者: Limerick 時間: 2025-3-22 12:22
The Logic of Science and the Science of Logic: Toward a Science of Reasoningreplaced, by an observational, historical, introspective approach; the new rhetoric is valuable for the generality of its aim but needs to be made more concrete, vis-a-vis both the materials of reasoning and logical analysis. Let us continue our critical review of available approaches.作者: 碎石 時間: 2025-3-22 13:09 作者: 碎石 時間: 2025-3-22 19:19 作者: 類人猿 時間: 2025-3-22 21:31
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43343-7tification, and between theory and practice. Remarks about such matters are universally regarded to be methodological remarks, and when a book contains them with the frequency and intensity that the . does, one has to conclude that such a book is a work on method, whatever its title may be and whatever other dimensions it may possess.作者: 托人看管 時間: 2025-3-23 04:11
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137022691ult of individuals thinking reasonably and acting with good reasons. The rationality of science is reduced to the . of scientific . in the first approach, to the provability of scientific . in the second, and to the rationality of . in the third.作者: eardrum 時間: 2025-3-23 07:30 作者: 東西 時間: 2025-3-23 12:10
Theory and Practice: The Methodological Content of Galileo’s Sciencetification, and between theory and practice. Remarks about such matters are universally regarded to be methodological remarks, and when a book contains them with the frequency and intensity that the . does, one has to conclude that such a book is a work on method, whatever its title may be and whatever other dimensions it may possess.作者: maculated 時間: 2025-3-23 16:06 作者: OTTER 時間: 2025-3-23 19:35 作者: 兩種語言 時間: 2025-3-23 23:53
Book 1980cientific method, and therefore as a leading example of scientific rationality. However, as we know, the matter is not so simple. The range of Galileo readings is so varied that one may be led to the conclusion that it is a case of chacun a son Galileo; that here, as with the Bible, or Plato or Kant作者: genuine 時間: 2025-3-24 05:25 作者: agonist 時間: 2025-3-24 09:53
,The Amritsar Massacre, 1919–1920,erning scientific rationality, the history and the nature of philosophy, and the historiography of science. Let us continue our two-faceted critiques by exploiting the opportunities offered by classic Galileo scholarship from the point of view of the logic of erudition.作者: confide 時間: 2025-3-24 14:34 作者: DEMUR 時間: 2025-3-24 18:24
Solving Conflicts and Problems,w) indicates, the First Day contains on the average a distinct methodological discussion about every 10 pages,. the Second Day about every 7? pages, the Third Day every 9 pages, and the Fourth every 8 pages. In other words, the methodological intensity of the book does not vary much from beginning to end.作者: 持久 時間: 2025-3-24 19:31
Concreteness and Judgment: The Dialectical Nature of Galileo’s Methodologyw) indicates, the First Day contains on the average a distinct methodological discussion about every 10 pages,. the Second Day about every 7? pages, the Third Day every 9 pages, and the Fourth every 8 pages. In other words, the methodological intensity of the book does not vary much from beginning to end.作者: 反應 時間: 2025-3-25 00:12
Xuemin Wang,Chao Yuan,Philippe HumbertIt is now time to formulate a number of basic principles of logical theorizing. Logic is conceived here, of course, as the theory of reasoning. In this chapter we shall be concerned with only one of its two main problems.作者: Infusion 時間: 2025-3-25 07:08
Propositional Structure: The Understanding of ReasoningIt is now time to formulate a number of basic principles of logical theorizing. Logic is conceived here, of course, as the theory of reasoning. In this chapter we shall be concerned with only one of its two main problems.作者: Brittle 時間: 2025-3-25 10:01 作者: hysterectomy 時間: 2025-3-25 13:32 作者: 肉身 時間: 2025-3-25 16:04 作者: Conserve 時間: 2025-3-25 23:04
The Europeanization of the East-West Systemuted to Galileo a knowledge of the law of inertia, the law of force, the principle of superposition, the law of squares, and the parabolic path of projectiles;. what is not well known is that, as I. B. Cohen has argued, “Newton almost certainly did not read the . - if, indeed, he ever did at all - u作者: Fsh238 時間: 2025-3-26 00:41
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43343-7nalysis, conceptualization, human interests and capacities, causal investigation, explanations, comprehensibility, criticism, simplicity, quantitative and qualitative considerations, open-mindedness, and ignorance; (2) the nature of, and interrelationships among, these things and others, such as the作者: Decongestant 時間: 2025-3-26 06:44 作者: STELL 時間: 2025-3-26 10:24 作者: 盤旋 時間: 2025-3-26 15:18 作者: HUSH 時間: 2025-3-26 19:56 作者: Corporeal 時間: 2025-3-26 21:27 作者: 松軟無力 時間: 2025-3-27 03:29
Auditing the Initial Case Studyhistoriography of science, and for the history and historiography of philosophy. It has also emerged that reasoning is the book’s central feature, both at the level of scientific practice, and at the level of philosophical reflection. It follows that reasoning, which of course is not to be confused 作者: 稱贊 時間: 2025-3-27 07:33
Maligne Gezwellen (kwaadaardig)y of reasoning than that provided by the usual controlled experiments done by psychologists. Moreover, since what we want is a . theory of reasoning, there is no reason why we should not avail ourselves of the scientific methodology worked out earlier, when we discussed the methodological content of作者: 性滿足 時間: 2025-3-27 13:23 作者: 悠然 時間: 2025-3-27 13:54 作者: 使成整體 時間: 2025-3-27 21:02
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-941-8te the arguments which in Chapter 2 were merely described; in part it is useful to reanalyze the . in accordance with the results of Chapter 7, which suggest the idea of Galileo as being first and foremost a methodologist of reasoning; in part it is important to give content to the program outlined 作者: 哀悼 時間: 2025-3-28 01:49 作者: euphoria 時間: 2025-3-28 04:17
Galileo and the Art of Reasoning978-94-009-9017-3Series ISSN 0068-0346 Series E-ISSN 2214-7942 作者: 路標 時間: 2025-3-28 08:14
Faith Versus Reason: The Rhetorical Form and Content of Galileo’s friend of the interlocutors, who may be identified with Galileo himself. Moreover, the book is full of passages containing disclaimers by the supposedly Copernican spokesman, Salviati, to the effect that his Copernican beliefs are not necessarily as strong as they may appear when he is involved in 作者: 啞巴 時間: 2025-3-28 13:00 作者: 枯萎將要 時間: 2025-3-28 17:53 作者: corpus-callosum 時間: 2025-3-28 21:11 作者: Suppository 時間: 2025-3-28 23:52
Theory and Practice: The Methodological Content of Galileo’s Sciencenalysis, conceptualization, human interests and capacities, causal investigation, explanations, comprehensibility, criticism, simplicity, quantitative and qualitative considerations, open-mindedness, and ignorance; (2) the nature of, and interrelationships among, these things and others, such as the作者: inhibit 時間: 2025-3-29 03:59
Concreteness and Judgment: The Dialectical Nature of Galileo’s Methodologyw) indicates, the First Day contains on the average a distinct methodological discussion about every 10 pages,. the Second Day about every 7? pages, the Third Day every 9 pages, and the Fourth every 8 pages. In other words, the methodological intensity of the book does not vary much from beginning t作者: 平常 時間: 2025-3-29 09:27 作者: 反抗者 時間: 2025-3-29 13:42
The Rationality of Science and the Science of Rationality: Critique of Subjectivisming peculiar to science and demarcating it from other cognitive activities, or does it consist essentially of a special case of general cognitive rationality? Three types of answers are possible to such questions. One may say that science is rational insofar as it evolves and develops in a way that 作者: Flu表流動 時間: 2025-3-29 17:37 作者: gusher 時間: 2025-3-29 22:51
The Erudition of Logic and the Logic of Erudition: Critique of Galileo Scholarshipinstructive. In part, we have gained new or deeper insights into his work; but we have also derived useful theoretical and methodological lessons concerning scientific rationality, the history and the nature of philosophy, and the historiography of science. Let us continue our two-faceted critiques 作者: 嘲弄 時間: 2025-3-30 00:46
The Psychology of Logic and the Logic of Psychology: Critique of the Psychology of Reasoninghistoriography of science, and for the history and historiography of philosophy. It has also emerged that reasoning is the book’s central feature, both at the level of scientific practice, and at the level of philosophical reflection. It follows that reasoning, which of course is not to be confused 作者: Employee 時間: 2025-3-30 05:08 作者: defuse 時間: 2025-3-30 11:17 作者: 咆哮 時間: 2025-3-30 15:42
Active Involvement: The Evaluation of Reasonings interest among both practical reasoners and logical theorists. It is not clear why this is so: perhaps it is because the truth shines more brilliantly than error and hence needs less display to prevail and flourish than error does in order to be avoided. I am inclined to think that a fundamental r作者: 劇毒 時間: 2025-3-30 19:44 作者: 用手捏 時間: 2025-3-30 22:02
arged passages, where various persons, books, and ideas are criticized not dispassionately but rather with ridicule, scorn, and con-tempt. In other passages the interlocutors play tricks on each other, trying to trap one another into saying something so that they can win the argument; such trickery 作者: 尾隨 時間: 2025-3-31 04:14 作者: 供過于求 時間: 2025-3-31 05:10
The Europeanization of the East-West System the introduction of this ‘nothing’ (center of the universe) that is yet supposed to act on material bodies; he considers this quite unsatisfactory... [because] although it accounts for the spherical shape of the earth it does not explain the spherical shape of the other heavenly bodies”.. Einstein 作者: 征服 時間: 2025-3-31 09:19
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22845-3s possible to interpret the other methodological topics in terms of logic and reasoning, namely to what extent one can reduce the book’s methodological discussions to discussions concerning logic and reasoning.
