派博傳思國(guó)際中心

標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Evaluating Schools; Dynamic Production o Moritz G. Sowada Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licens [打印本頁(yè)]

作者: External-Otitis    時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 17:01
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Evaluating Schools影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Evaluating Schools影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Evaluating Schools網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Evaluating Schools網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Evaluating Schools被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Evaluating Schools被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Evaluating Schools年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Evaluating Schools年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Evaluating Schools讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Evaluating Schools讀者反饋學(xué)科排名





作者: palpitate    時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 22:15

作者: negligence    時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 03:32
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3958-1lves active discursive work by inspectors to establish what constitutes normal performance and justify divergences from the norm. Scoring discussions are shaped by tensions between following standardised procedures and exercising professional discretion to account for school-specific contexts.
作者: 抗原    時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 06:04
A Framework to Conceptualise the Scoring Work of School Inspection Teams,xity of scoring tasks, internal and external constraints, and the distinction between scoring processes and products further illuminate the dynamics of inspection judgements. The framework avoids overreliance on a single rigid approach, instead carefully employing multiple lenses to engage meaningfully with the empirical data on scoring work.
作者: arboretum    時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:07

作者: 庇護(hù)    時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 15:38
Steps of Scoring Discussions by School Inspection Teams,lves active discursive work by inspectors to establish what constitutes normal performance and justify divergences from the norm. Scoring discussions are shaped by tensions between following standardised procedures and exercising professional discretion to account for school-specific contexts.
作者: 庇護(hù)    時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:42

作者: 排出    時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:54

作者: overture    時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:49
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47522-1 on illuminating the process and conditions shaping score production, especially how disagreements are resolved. Key contributions of this study for a more sophisticated understanding of inspection dynamics are outlined. The chapter concludes with an overview of the book structure.
作者: Vital-Signs    時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 09:13
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66655-6space for inspection teams to enact scoring based on their situated practices and professional vision. The chapter argues that scoring work is best understood as a partially bounded discretionary practice, given the limits of official guidelines in fully determining scoring decisions in practice.
作者: 變化    時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 12:01
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5583-6l and development. These findings highlight how scoring decisions may serve as policy levers for school improvement, but also how accountability pressures and central criteria constrain inspectors’ discretion.
作者: 束以馬具    時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 16:58

作者: Inflammation    時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 22:01
The Official Procedures of External School Evaluation,space for inspection teams to enact scoring based on their situated practices and professional vision. The chapter argues that scoring work is best understood as a partially bounded discretionary practice, given the limits of official guidelines in fully determining scoring decisions in practice.
作者: 改正    時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 22:36
Approaches to Scoring the Quality of Schools by Inspection Teams,l and development. These findings highlight how scoring decisions may serve as policy levers for school improvement, but also how accountability pressures and central criteria constrain inspectors’ discretion.
作者: Noisome    時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 04:43
978-3-031-62326-4The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
作者: 褻瀆    時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 06:57
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62324-0evaluation practice; discretion; judgement formation; professional judgement; school evaluation; school i
作者: Incorporate    時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 13:48

作者: BABY    時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 15:20
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42710-2tive scoring processes. First, the conceptual review covers judgement and decision-making literature, identifying extensive research on individual cognition but a gap in understanding scoring interactions in groups. Educational assessment research provides relevant concepts like holistic versus anal
作者: 悠然    時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 22:22
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5953-7 valuation constellation perspective to examine how the positions and relations between actors, formal and implicit rules, and enabling and constraining infrastructures shape inspection teams’ scoring work. The chapter also draws on the street-level bureaucracy perspective to acknowledge the potenti
作者: Conclave    時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 02:29
Modeling with Nonsmooth Dynamicsting some basic assumptions informing the research design, followed by the overall rationale for the selected qualitative research approach. Key aspects addressed include the selection of research sites in two German states (Lower Saxony and Thuringia), the recruitment of research participants, and
作者: BRINK    時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 07:06
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66655-6xony and Thuringia. A comparative analysis of legislation, quality frameworks, inspection criteria, and approaches to lesson observations reveals significant differences in the regulatory density and intensity between the two inspection systems. Lower Saxony provides more detailed specifications com
作者: Hyperopia    時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 10:40
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0273-8ssures when finalising scoring decisions. Inspectors engage in preparatory scoring work before on-site visits by reviewing school documentation to form initial impressions. During inspections, early scoring tendencies emerge but are not necessarily determinative, as inspectors balance quick decision
作者: Communicate    時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 15:19
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5583-6are identified: ‘going micro’ by focusing on specific criteria, indicators and evidence to resolve scoring challenges; and ‘going macro’ by considering the overall picture, narrative and potential consequences of scores to influence school improvement. Inspectors navigate the tension between standar
作者: 飛行員    時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 16:25

作者: PLIC    時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 21:44
Intelligent Systems Reference Libraryscussions. A key element of these scoring discussions is the establishment of shared performance expectations—of what is considered normal. The chapter highlights specific rhetorical strategies used by inspectors to upgrade or downgrade scores, which are often based on comparisons that establish ref
作者: 最初    時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:40

作者: 善于騙人    時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 04:47

作者: 最后一個(gè)    時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 10:53
http://image.papertrans.cn/f/image/320766.jpg
作者: 其他    時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 13:14

作者: 極端的正確性    時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:47

作者: 等待    時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 21:31

作者: 簡(jiǎn)潔    時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 03:22

作者: orient    時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 08:12

作者: INCUR    時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 11:53

作者: cajole    時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 13:41

作者: 確定無(wú)疑    時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 19:24
Intelligent Systems Reference Library framework provides ground rules, arriving at joint scores requires complex discursive work that goes beyond mechanically applying predefined criteria. The naturalistic analysis of inspector negotiations provides novel insights into the social production of school inspection scores, shedding light o
作者: CT-angiography    時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 00:32
Beibei Ren,Shuzhi Sam Ge,Tong Heng Leenowledge and channel professional discretion. The chapter reflects on the study’s contributions to the theoretical understanding of street-level bureaucracy and valuation practices in school governance. Limitations and future research directions are identified.
作者: 慎重    時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 03:09
Book 2024ze their scoring task. By drawing on empirical data from six observed inspection teams from two German states, it provides profound insights into how real evaluation decisions were made. This book is valuable to anyone seeking to understand evaluation in education – in particular scholars, policy-ma
作者: trigger    時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 09:01
Situating the Study of School Inspection in the Context of the Evaluation Society,gement approaches in education. School inspection is positioned as a key policy tool for monitoring and improving school quality, introduced in Germany following ‘disappointing’ PISA results in 2001. The chapter argues that while inspection methodologies aim for standardisation, significant discreti
作者: Synchronism    時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 12:44

作者: 熒光    時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 14:41
A Framework to Conceptualise the Scoring Work of School Inspection Teams, valuation constellation perspective to examine how the positions and relations between actors, formal and implicit rules, and enabling and constraining infrastructures shape inspection teams’ scoring work. The chapter also draws on the street-level bureaucracy perspective to acknowledge the potenti
作者: Type-1-Diabetes    時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 19:11
The Study Design for the Analysis of the Scoring Work of School Inspection Teams,ting some basic assumptions informing the research design, followed by the overall rationale for the selected qualitative research approach. Key aspects addressed include the selection of research sites in two German states (Lower Saxony and Thuringia), the recruitment of research participants, and
作者: GREEN    時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 02:51
The Official Procedures of External School Evaluation,xony and Thuringia. A comparative analysis of legislation, quality frameworks, inspection criteria, and approaches to lesson observations reveals significant differences in the regulatory density and intensity between the two inspection systems. Lower Saxony provides more detailed specifications com
作者: APO    時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 05:47
Understanding the Practice of External School Evaluation by Inspection Teams,ssures when finalising scoring decisions. Inspectors engage in preparatory scoring work before on-site visits by reviewing school documentation to form initial impressions. During inspections, early scoring tendencies emerge but are not necessarily determinative, as inspectors balance quick decision




歡迎光臨 派博傳思國(guó)際中心 (http://www.pjsxioz.cn/) Powered by Discuz! X3.5
炎陵县| 凭祥市| 兰州市| 霍邱县| 油尖旺区| 图木舒克市| 聂荣县| 襄垣县| 南安市| 土默特右旗| 京山县| 长乐市| 融水| 元谋县| 安徽省| 廊坊市| 青神县| 全南县| 吉木萨尔县| 越西县| 山阴县| 垦利县| 镇远县| 大城县| 海林市| 嘉禾县| 柞水县| 尉犁县| 新巴尔虎左旗| 青神县| 施秉县| 广南县| 花莲市| 定襄县| 定日县| 旺苍县| 和平县| 阳新县| 婺源县| 宿松县| 葫芦岛市|