派博傳思國際中心

標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Exploring Administrative Decision-Making in Public Education; The Negligence Evolu Beth Godett,Liana M. Nobile Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if [打印本頁]

作者: 不足木    時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 20:05
書目名稱Exploring Administrative Decision-Making in Public Education影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Exploring Administrative Decision-Making in Public Education影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Exploring Administrative Decision-Making in Public Education網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Exploring Administrative Decision-Making in Public Education網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Exploring Administrative Decision-Making in Public Education被引頻次




書目名稱Exploring Administrative Decision-Making in Public Education被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Exploring Administrative Decision-Making in Public Education年度引用




書目名稱Exploring Administrative Decision-Making in Public Education年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Exploring Administrative Decision-Making in Public Education讀者反饋




書目名稱Exploring Administrative Decision-Making in Public Education讀者反饋學(xué)科排名





作者: 凈禮    時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 22:20
Exploring Administrative Decision-Making in Public EducationThe Negligence Evolu
作者: jealousy    時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:43
Exploring Administrative Decision-Making in Public Education978-3-031-58782-5
作者: 認(rèn)識(shí)    時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 07:47

作者: 一窩小鳥    時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:40

作者: Fulminate    時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 16:03

作者: Fulminate    時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 18:51
Challenges Posed by Public PolicyChapter . discusses challenges that public school employees face due to public policy—a concept that is difficult to define, especially in the context of public education. By examining key court opinions, this chapter aims to encourage readers to begin thinking about how public policy affects public education in a post-COVID-19 world.
作者: HARD    時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 01:08

作者: tangle    時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 02:14
Beth Godett,Liana M. NobileExpands the definition of "next-gen negligence" in the context of public school law and policy.Provides insights into the shifting landscape of public education for school administrators.Focuses on a
作者: deviate    時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 07:34
http://image.papertrans.cn/f/image/320246.jpg
作者: 接觸    時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 09:58

作者: 合法    時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:55
The Neoclassical Theory of Price,about negligence from more traditional or expected cases, such as premises liability, bullying, and discrimination cases, to current hot topics in education law as seen in recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions and arising in school districts across the country. The authors introduce what they are calling “next-gen negligence.”
作者: 肉身    時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 18:28

作者: IST    時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:46

作者: 鳴叫    時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 05:38

作者: 膽小鬼    時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 07:17

作者: 出血    時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 10:42

作者: cushion    時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:37

作者: 專心    時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 22:16
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58782-5school law; parental rights; book bans; school administration; elements of negligence; elements of educat
作者: 積習(xí)難改    時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 00:23
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58414-5he responsibilities of a public school administrator. This chapter presents a legal primer to help administrators develop an understanding of common law negligence and where it fits with their practice. It provides scenarios for the reader to contemplate, complete with questions prompting considerat
作者: 使混合    時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 04:27

作者: ABHOR    時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 08:47
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23186-7ve if they are to skillfully navigate the potential for professional liability and best serve their students. Explored within are themes essential to the evolution of students’ rights within the context of a right to education that the U.S. Supreme Court has never deemed “fundamental.” Outlined thro
作者: entitle    時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 15:40
The Neoclassical Theory of Price,about negligence from more traditional or expected cases, such as premises liability, bullying, and discrimination cases, to current hot topics in education law as seen in recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions and arising in school districts across the country. The authors introduce what they are call
作者: 具體    時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 19:09

作者: 凌辱    時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 20:35

作者: PAC    時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:48

作者: indecipherable    時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 06:54

作者: 是突襲    時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 11:52
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6839-4public school district may be liable for negligence, especially as regards student mental health concerns. The authors also ask readers to contemplate the relationship between mental health and bullying, an issue prevalent in public schools, today. Finally, the authors examine the difference in anti
作者: implore    時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:08
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09399-4nges to the modes of learning during COVID-19 school closures brought issues of equity front and center in terms of access and resources. Even years after the pandemic, these issues could mean increased liability for school administrators, especially when the use of government funds, or shortfalls i
作者: Acumen    時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:58
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230510050nt role agencies play in protecting our citizens and agencies’ increasing vulnerability based upon U.S. Supreme Court decisions threatening to cede their authority to Congress. There are many agencies that support education and validate administrative decision-making. Also in this chapter is a brief
作者: 用手捏    時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 23:19
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287358g environment. Social media and influencers, COVID-19, entertainment masquerading as news, imaginative play, and indeed parents and students both seeking a more involved role in education are all discussed, with the authors asking readers to think outside the box about how each of these unexpected c
作者: peptic-ulcer    時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 03:54
Traditional Understandings of Negligencehe responsibilities of a public school administrator. This chapter presents a legal primer to help administrators develop an understanding of common law negligence and where it fits with their practice. It provides scenarios for the reader to contemplate, complete with questions prompting considerat
作者: 拱形大橋    時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:49

作者: ECG769    時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 11:55
Negligence and the Right to an Educationve if they are to skillfully navigate the potential for professional liability and best serve their students. Explored within are themes essential to the evolution of students’ rights within the context of a right to education that the U.S. Supreme Court has never deemed “fundamental.” Outlined thro
作者: Cabg318    時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 17:07
Defining “Next-Gen Negligence”about negligence from more traditional or expected cases, such as premises liability, bullying, and discrimination cases, to current hot topics in education law as seen in recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions and arising in school districts across the country. The authors introduce what they are call
作者: Evacuate    時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 21:34

作者: 情感    時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 00:59

作者: Evacuate    時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 05:59
Next-Gen Negligence and Equityty and equality, concepts that are often confused but that have important differences, especially when contemplating the duties owed by public school employees to various stakeholders such as other employees, students, and parents. Through an examination of landmark cases, statutes, and current even
作者: 刻苦讀書    時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 08:36
Next-Gen Negligence and Students’ Unique Learning Needsudents with unique learning needs. Looking again at court decisions with which, by this point, readers should be readily familiar, the authors examine how and when an administrator may be exposed to liability for negligence with respect to meeting the needs of each and every student in the district.
作者: 花費(fèi)    時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 10:34
Next-Gen Negligence and Mental Healthpublic school district may be liable for negligence, especially as regards student mental health concerns. The authors also ask readers to contemplate the relationship between mental health and bullying, an issue prevalent in public schools, today. Finally, the authors examine the difference in anti
作者: organism    時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 18:05

作者: 做事過頭    時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 21:15
Next-Gen Negligence and Governancent role agencies play in protecting our citizens and agencies’ increasing vulnerability based upon U.S. Supreme Court decisions threatening to cede their authority to Congress. There are many agencies that support education and validate administrative decision-making. Also in this chapter is a brief
作者: legacy    時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 01:17
Next-Gen Negligence and Unexpected Challengesg environment. Social media and influencers, COVID-19, entertainment masquerading as news, imaginative play, and indeed parents and students both seeking a more involved role in education are all discussed, with the authors asking readers to think outside the box about how each of these unexpected c
作者: 偏離    時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 07:08
Book 2024ld easily, and even unintentionally, create a climate for an increase in negligence-based lawsuits. Vacillating laws and societal expectations force administrators to adjust to changing education paradigms as our traditional model of schooling responds to previously unimagined realities. There is no
作者: Fecundity    時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 09:15
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23186-7ugh the histories of landmark legal challenges is the struggle to identify the rights of students and parents in public education, with an emphasis on the early 1900s through to the present day. This chapter serves as an introduction to what the authors term “next-gen negligence.”
作者: Range-Of-Motion    時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 14:49

作者: Colonoscopy    時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 17:57

作者: Deference    時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 21:37
Negligence and the Right to an Educationugh the histories of landmark legal challenges is the struggle to identify the rights of students and parents in public education, with an emphasis on the early 1900s through to the present day. This chapter serves as an introduction to what the authors term “next-gen negligence.”
作者: 處理    時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 00:28

作者: thrombosis    時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 06:58

作者: 平常    時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 12:15

作者: 自戀    時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 16:02
of public education for school administrators.Focuses on a .This book explores the intersections of negligence law in the context of public schooling and school policy. Today’s schools face challenges that could easily, and even unintentionally, create a climate for an increase in negligence-based
作者: 協(xié)定    時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 19:25
The Disappearance of Marx in Lenin, and the public policy expectations of educators and public education, readers are helped to understand the relationships upon which liability rests. Scenarios for readers to explore help to translate the theory of Chap. . into administrative practice.
作者: HERE    時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 00:42
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137047908ry books or as advocates for their students. Teachers and administrators alike will often find themselves collaborating with parents for the good of their students. This chapter explores anticipated challenges from parents and asks readers to contemplate the duties owed by administrators, teachers, and other public school employees.




歡迎光臨 派博傳思國際中心 (http://www.pjsxioz.cn/) Powered by Discuz! X3.5
陵川县| 夏河县| 西城区| 介休市| 昔阳县| 湘潭县| 北宁市| 翁源县| 定兴县| 贵溪市| 新密市| 郸城县| 东山县| 上杭县| 松江区| 北京市| 中牟县| 廊坊市| 惠州市| 如东县| 黄平县| 徐水县| 昌乐县| 广宗县| 大足县| 呼伦贝尔市| 绍兴市| 绥阳县| 当涂县| 腾冲县| 岳普湖县| 壤塘县| 南通市| 金寨县| 涿州市| 吴桥县| 天津市| 突泉县| 镇江市| 时尚| 西宁市|