標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Extensionalism: The Revolution in Logic; Nimrod Bar-Am Book 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008 Aristotle.Gottfried Wilhelm Lei [打印本頁] 作者: 兩邊在擴(kuò)散 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 16:35
書目名稱Extensionalism: The Revolution in Logic影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Extensionalism: The Revolution in Logic影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Extensionalism: The Revolution in Logic網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Extensionalism: The Revolution in Logic網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Extensionalism: The Revolution in Logic被引頻次
書目名稱Extensionalism: The Revolution in Logic被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Extensionalism: The Revolution in Logic年度引用
書目名稱Extensionalism: The Revolution in Logic年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Extensionalism: The Revolution in Logic讀者反饋
書目名稱Extensionalism: The Revolution in Logic讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 致詞 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 20:26 作者: 字形刻痕 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 03:19 作者: Neonatal 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 04:48 作者: 大漩渦 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:33
The Neglect of Judgmentotice that under the title “analytic judgment” two items were traditionally presented: one concerning analytic propositions, and one concerning the knowledge of their contents. Similarly, under the title “judgment” two items were traditionally presented: one concerning propositions as such, and anot作者: languor 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:53 作者: languor 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 17:17 作者: 彩色的蠟筆 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:52
Mathematical Logic: An Oxymoron. These were the early steps in the study of formal (“universal”, or “symbolical” as it was labeled then) Algebra. Studies of the history of the formalization of algebra are thus of the background to the history of the extensionalist revolution. In hindsight they are clearly right: indeed, we now kn作者: 物種起源 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:56 作者: Headstrong 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 05:56 作者: 減少 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:18
In the Shadow of the Member States in the opening to his . and again in the opening to his .. But it was already noticed and celebrated in the most epic philosophical episodes of all times: the meeting of Parmenides, Zeno and the young Socrates in the famous opening of Plato’s .. There, the young Socrates observes (somewhat sarcasti作者: acetylcholine 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 14:13 作者: Ancestor 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 20:46 作者: GRAVE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 01:42
Orbifolds and the Modular Curve,ects (whatever that means exactly) and which spawn self-evident definitions and syllogisms. The validity of science, then, depends upon the validity of the process by which experience allegedly impresses (legitimate) concepts upon us, and the validity of the process of extracting taxonomies out of s作者: 燈泡 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 05:11
Kilian E. C. Smith,Sabine Sch?ferotice that under the title “analytic judgment” two items were traditionally presented: one concerning analytic propositions, and one concerning the knowledge of their contents. Similarly, under the title “judgment” two items were traditionally presented: one concerning propositions as such, and anot作者: 主動 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 09:53 作者: GLIB 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 14:39
Juan J. Villalba,Frederick D. Provenzaited: his distinctive understanding of Hume’s critique is one of his great contributions to philosophy. He understood Hume to have implied the bankruptcy of Leibniz’s project, the project of rationalizing the conflation of science and traditional logic (by means of the explicit founding of the forme作者: 秘密會議 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 16:13
Screening of CEST MR Contrast Agents. These were the early steps in the study of formal (“universal”, or “symbolical” as it was labeled then) Algebra. Studies of the history of the formalization of algebra are thus of the background to the history of the extensionalist revolution. In hindsight they are clearly right: indeed, we now kn作者: 引導(dǎo) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 21:09
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-8717-4ics as able to serve such classic practical (and moral) ends. Those who surmised that mathematics can justify science could then contribute. This is where probability theory enters our story. It is also where De Morgan enters it. And Boole too. Nowhere was extensionalism more natural and less conspi作者: 增減字母法 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 23:51
Book 2008 inquire if far off fields were already planted, harvested, or even if they exist. A pedestrian mayfind it hard or even impossible to do so. The pedestrian view contains fine points that the pilot’s map never would, but it does not necessarily contain more information, for it lacks the general conte作者: 情感 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 03:44 作者: Multiple 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 10:30 作者: Paradox 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 12:14 作者: uveitis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 19:10 作者: indignant 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 23:22 作者: Merited 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 00:29
Semantics is not Ontologyogy determines success conditions for this fusion: it dictates that the reference of universal terms must exist if they are to be meaningful and logically usable. Yet, says Aristotle, the reference of these terms cannot really exist: universal objects cannot really exist: they are not objects. And s作者: 玩笑 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 06:43 作者: Systemic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 08:41
The Conflation of the Source with the True, Good and Beautiful (Source)at legitimate, complex, concepts spawn science: they spawn all first principles and, thus, all syllogisms. Science is the (true) taxonomy of reality and it is given, in its entirety, by the very list of legitimate concepts. How is this list given to us, then? We have mentioned that taxonomy rests on作者: 歡騰 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:12
Induction as Spell-Castingtaxonomies and syllogisms which science comprises. The extraction of such syllogisms out of the concepts and taxonomies that contain them is Aristotelian logic. Syllogisms justify and explain the very taxonomies which they extract. (Strictly speaking, first principles need no justification and no ex作者: 名義上 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 20:22 作者: alleviate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 23:11
Taxonomy of Reality by Syllogismences of his notion of term over his notion of taxonomy statement (and thus) over his notion of syllogism. My aim was neither to criticize these notions nor the system as a whole, of course, but rather to note the knotty package deal that they comprised. It was a tough, take-it-whole-or-leave-it, pa作者: 量被毀壞 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 02:53
Logic: Logic between Aristotle and Boolemuch interesting material and of many interesting periods in the history of logic. Megarian and Stoic logic are mentioned now only in passing and to a very limited end. Significant works of Aristotle’s followers (Greek, Roman, Arabic and scholastic) are ignored here. We are about to leap forward in 作者: Arthropathy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:32
The Neglect of Judgmentsical problems were: (1) What judgment is analytic? (2) What judgments are analytic? Today we are used to formal logic so much that we easily concentrate on the title “analytic” and forget all about the meaningful, portentous, term “judgment”, and ignore its influence upon the history of logic. Logi作者: 浪費(fèi)時(shí)間 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 13:05
Leibniz as Aristotle and Boole Conflateds well as one of the greatest thinkers ever, and yet his profoundest achievements as a logician were magnificent outlines of a grand program that was doomed to failure. He was a prophet whose insistence on the immediate actualizing of ideals had forced his followers to notice the impossibility of do作者: bizarre 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 16:22
Why Transcendental Logic is no Logic at Allic slumber. Is it not a little puzzling? Hume explicitly criticized Locke’s philosophy of science: he portrayed the limits of Locke’s empiricism. Kant (even in his deepest of dogmatic slumbers) was no advocate of Locke’s philosophy of science. He was certainly no empiricist. Rather, to the extant th作者: Decibel 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 18:57 作者: RAGE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 00:30
Mathematical Logic: An Oxymoronindsight comes naturally: the antecedents require reconstruction. Extensionalism is no exception. Fascinating, detailed studies of the hindsight perspective comprise investigations into 18th and early 19th century mathematics. They emphasize every precursor to extensionalism. They often show that in作者: tackle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 03:43 作者: 為敵 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 08:31 作者: 抗原 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 12:38
Peter Parker,Joyce Mokhesi-Parkerentary conceptions of logical proof that we know of. It is appropriate to begin, then, with a few notes on Parmenides poem, for Parmenides has been called ‘the father of logical proof’ and even ‘the father of logical indirect proof.作者: 呼吸 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 18:18
Wataru Doi,Seiichi Watanabe,James T. Carlton sophists challenge, in one neat parcel. It demanded the conflation of these two tasks by means of acceptance into logic of a series of (not always explicit) extra-logical intuitions which became increasingly antiquated and outdated but ever so hard to pinpoint and replace.作者: 疏忽 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 20:02
The Mother of All Conflations: Parmenides’ Proofentary conceptions of logical proof that we know of. It is appropriate to begin, then, with a few notes on Parmenides poem, for Parmenides has been called ‘the father of logical proof’ and even ‘the father of logical indirect proof.作者: Frequency 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 23:22
Taxonomy of Reality by Syllogism sophists challenge, in one neat parcel. It demanded the conflation of these two tasks by means of acceptance into logic of a series of (not always explicit) extra-logical intuitions which became increasingly antiquated and outdated but ever so hard to pinpoint and replace.作者: 分期付款 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 05:39 作者: Respond 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 10:42
Ken’ichi Ohshika,Athanase Papadopoulos the act of recognition of similarities. But whence is the source of this observed similarity? In fact what is similarity? How is it established? How are concepts generated? And how do we come to choose some concepts (supposedly “l(fā)egitimate” ones) and avoid others (supposedly non-legitimate ones) in the first place?作者: Yourself 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 12:39
Outline of Preliminary Notesation, and finally Proof, direct and indirect. My excuse is that these terms are not clear enough as they do not have a canonic version. Significant points in the literature in which they play a role are unclear. I am afraid I found it important to clarify them somewhat.作者: Lament 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 18:34
The Conflation of the Source with the True, Good and Beautiful (Source) the act of recognition of similarities. But whence is the source of this observed similarity? In fact what is similarity? How is it established? How are concepts generated? And how do we come to choose some concepts (supposedly “l(fā)egitimate” ones) and avoid others (supposedly non-legitimate ones) in the first place?作者: deadlock 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 22:11
history of logic that explains logical theories as philosopha single life-span. Philosophers, then, do not see more or know more, and they do not see less or know less. They aim to see less detail and more of the abstract. Their details, if you like, are abstractions. Walking on God’s earth as a ped作者: 高貴領(lǐng)導(dǎo) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 02:13
Modernity: Urban Culture and the Balkans,exactly identical with either. It may seem only natural, then, that induction, initially a tag name for a family of dialectical modes of argumentation, should share with dialectics that heavy epistemological overload. In the . induction takes over this very overload.作者: cancer 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 07:49 作者: lymphedema 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 12:08
Contemporary Georgia: Here and There, from disintegrating. Its merit is obvious: it was the first glimpse of a theory of meaning that allows universal terms to be meaningful even without admitting that universal objects exist. Let us now discuss some of the difficulties entangled within.作者: 希望 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 14:26
Law and Practice in the United Kingdom,s a rather straightforward refutation of the claim that the Aristotelian system is complete: it does not describe all valid reasoning. As it was well known, since antiquity, how did this knowledge influence the history of logic? I expand a bit on the formal limitations of Aristotle’s logic in this chapter.作者: 大都市 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 18:28
FIV as a Model for HIV: An Overview,moment of their inception. Extensionalism is no exception, though it did mature at an astonishingly high rate. Since things will happen fast once they are set into motion it helps to take a good look at the fully fledged idea before surveying its chronicles so as to find its earliest sources and announce its precise moment of inception.作者: 桉樹 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 23:15 作者: Schlemms-Canal 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 02:50
Semantics is not Ontology from disintegrating. Its merit is obvious: it was the first glimpse of a theory of meaning that allows universal terms to be meaningful even without admitting that universal objects exist. Let us now discuss some of the difficulties entangled within.作者: Preserve 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 08:31
Logic: Logic between Aristotle and Booles a rather straightforward refutation of the claim that the Aristotelian system is complete: it does not describe all valid reasoning. As it was well known, since antiquity, how did this knowledge influence the history of logic? I expand a bit on the formal limitations of Aristotle’s logic in this chapter.作者: 協(xié)議 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 12:06
Extensionalism as Exorcismmoment of their inception. Extensionalism is no exception, though it did mature at an astonishingly high rate. Since things will happen fast once they are set into motion it helps to take a good look at the fully fledged idea before surveying its chronicles so as to find its earliest sources and announce its precise moment of inception.作者: chiropractor 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 14:31
The Birth of Induction from Sea Foamexactly identical with either. It may seem only natural, then, that induction, initially a tag name for a family of dialectical modes of argumentation, should share with dialectics that heavy epistemological overload. In the . induction takes over this very overload.作者: 偶像 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 18:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8168-2Aristotle; Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz; Immanuel Kant; Parmenides; formal logic; logic; philosophy; philosoph作者: 敵意 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 22:12
978-90-481-7790-5Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008作者: 馬賽克 時(shí)間: 2025-4-1 01:56 作者: Axillary 時(shí)間: 2025-4-1 06:16 作者: Firefly 時(shí)間: 2025-4-1 13:44
