作者: largesse 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 22:08
Reasoning, Judgement and Pragmaticsth the experimenter, but more often it is administered in a written form, using paper and pencil or a computer. Given that there are two interlocutors engaged in a communication, a conversational analysis is appropriate, whether the presence of the experimenter is physically real or mediated by the 作者: 表主動(dòng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 01:50
Exploring Quantifiers: Pragmatics Meets the Psychology of Comprehensionage quantifiers were formal (e.g., Barwise and Cooper, 1981; Keenan and Stavi, 1986; Westersth?l, 1989; Zwarts, 1996) and not psychological, inevitably it was desirable that our psychological data made contact with formal theories. Equally, we believed that it was important for formal theories to be作者: –scent 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 05:29
Testing the Cognitive and Communicative Principles of Relevance for Relevance Theory as a whole. More recent experimental work has made explicit, tested and confirmed other and more specific and central consequences of Relevance Theory (e.g. Sperber, Cara and Girotto, 1995; Politzer, 1996; Gibbs and Moise, 1997; Hardman, 1998; Nicolle and Clark, 1999; Matsui, 2作者: QUAIL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:20
Electrophysiology and Pragmatic Language Comprehension language comprehension, recent advances in the study of language suggest that the many-headed beast we call meaning depends importantly on electrical activity in the brains of the speakers and hearers who construct it.作者: florid 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 13:26
Reasoning and Pragmatics: the Case of of extra-logical factors on people’s thinking. Although he was motivated in this by his disagreement with Piagetian views about thinking, Wason’s work had a consequence that he could not have foreseen. By saying that thinking was NOT logical, Wason helped to shape the development of paradigms in the作者: florid 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:33 作者: Orthodontics 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 21:52
Semantic and Pragmatic Competence in Children’s and Adults’ Comprehension of ,draw when we interpret sentences including certain logical words and that allow one to go beyond what is literally said in the sentence. For example, following Grice and much literature inspired by him, it can be argued that if a speaker says ‘Some students passed the exam’ the hearer is likely to a作者: narcissism 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 02:34
George Seldes’ War for the Public Goodecise field in linguistics?’. He went on to ask if I also agreed that pragmatics was essentially a grab-bag for everything not covered by syntax and semantics, and hence not to be taken seriously. I disagreed with both of his attempted assertions.作者: Phonophobia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 08:48 作者: vector 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 11:31
,The Start of a Military Career (1853–1878),age quantifiers were formal (e.g., Barwise and Cooper, 1981; Keenan and Stavi, 1986; Westersth?l, 1989; Zwarts, 1996) and not psychological, inevitably it was desirable that our psychological data made contact with formal theories. Equally, we believed that it was important for formal theories to be作者: 秘方藥 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 17:51 作者: 同位素 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 18:22 作者: 嗎啡 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 01:28 作者: nuclear-tests 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 04:01 作者: 長(zhǎng)矛 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 09:06
Geoscience Research and Educationdraw when we interpret sentences including certain logical words and that allow one to go beyond what is literally said in the sentence. For example, following Grice and much literature inspired by him, it can be argued that if a speaker says ‘Some students passed the exam’ the hearer is likely to a作者: 不規(guī)則的跳動(dòng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 10:43
Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognitionhttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/318895.jpg作者: 嘮叨 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:28 作者: monochromatic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 22:05 作者: Infraction 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 23:10 作者: fatty-acids 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 04:50
Orwell as Literary Critic: A Reassessmentsp both explicit and implicit content, recognize the force of a speech act, appreciate metaphor and irony? These issues have been studied in two disciplines: pragmatics and psycholinguistics, with limited interactions between the two. Pragmatics is rooted in the philosophy of language and in linguis作者: strdulate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 08:14
Introduction: The Artful Anti-colonialist,1969), for example, to refer to a dog, speakers must produce a referring expression (such as .) with the intention that it pick out or identify the dog for their addressees. But is the answer really this simple? Accounts of how people refer have changed again and again since about 1960, often dramat作者: 能得到 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 13:25
Philip Coleman,Steve Gronert Ellerhoffciologists have over the past 40 years offered important analytic insights into the ways people employ pragmatic knowledge in using and understanding language. Some psychologists, most notably psycholinguists and social psychologists, have exploited the findings from scholars working in linguistic-p作者: Substitution 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 16:21
George Seldes’ War for the Public Goodtestified that employees in a financial benefit plan had been led to buy company stock in various implicit but persuasive ways. For example, a company brochure provided step-by-step instructions on how employees could allocate retirement funds to various investment options. Employees were instructed作者: Jocose 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 21:04 作者: 通知 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 04:04
,The Start of a Military Career (1853–1878), been trying to establish the psychological (processing) properties of natural language quantifiers, and how quantified statements are understood. This includes how they are used, how they are represented in the minds of producers and listeners, and how to capture their meaning in a psychologically 作者: 吞沒 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 06:11 作者: corn732 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 11:04 作者: Contracture 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:16 作者: Cardiac 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 18:42
The Arctic Summer of E. M. Forster,future act, as in ‘.’ (‘I promise to clean my room’). For the past ten years, we have been investigating promise comprehension among children from the point of view that language is a communication system and that language competence is the acquisition and use of that system. The emphasis is therefo作者: hardheaded 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 00:17 作者: finite 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 03:58
Anthony P. Harvey,Judith A. Dimentarried by saying that . on a particular occasion in virtue of special features of the context’. The former he characterized as cases in which the ‘use of a certain form of words … would normally (in the absence of special circumstances) carry such-and-such an implicature or type of implicature’ (Gri作者: 沒花的是打擾 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:35 作者: 古董 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 13:14
Geoscience Research and Outreachce (1989) described . as having a weak word meaning identical to formal logic’s inclusive disjunction (which is false only in the case where both disjuncts are) but as conveying in conversation a speaker’s stronger meaning corresponding to the exclusive disjunction (which is false in the case where 作者: 卷發(fā) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 17:08 作者: AVID 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 19:27
978-1-4039-0351-8Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2004作者: ascend 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:14 作者: 違反 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 05:09 作者: 草率男 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 08:48 作者: 擔(dān)心 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 11:47 作者: 沉默 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 17:17 作者: Glutinous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 18:44 作者: Phagocytes 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 00:36
Exploring Quantifiers: Pragmatics Meets the Psychology of Comprehension been trying to establish the psychological (processing) properties of natural language quantifiers, and how quantified statements are understood. This includes how they are used, how they are represented in the minds of producers and listeners, and how to capture their meaning in a psychologically 作者: tangle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 06:50 作者: 繼承人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 09:15 作者: NUL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 11:43
Electrophysiology and Pragmatic Language Comprehension paper. What we have put down on paper are little dark marks, a copy of which you are now looking at. As for our thoughts, they remain where they always were, inside our brains.’ With these witty remarks, they note that while we often think and speak as if language were a conduit for thought, this i作者: 揮舞 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 18:14 作者: 打火石 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 21:26
Reasoning and Pragmatics: the Case of tic factors are often regarded as extraneous variables that interfere with people’s ability to compute logical inferences. Another view is that there are separate associative and symbol-manipulating systems for thinking (Evans and Over, 1996; Stanovich, 1999; Sloman, 1996). Under this view, the symb作者: DEBT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 00:47 作者: FLOAT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 06:47 作者: 倔強(qiáng)一點(diǎn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 11:24 作者: 牲畜欄 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 15:55
Conversational Implicatures: Nonce or Generalized?logy, syntax and semantics? The debate, as debates tend to do, has been going back and forth, with this or that side taking a momentary advantage until the pendulum swings back to the other side again. It is dubious whether the question can be answered in general, if only because some pragmatic phen作者: Acquired 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 18:02 作者: Intractable 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 21:12 作者: neutral-posture 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 02:49 作者: 閑聊 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 05:10
Changing Ideas about Referenceically. But how have they changed, and why? In this chapter, we offer a selective, largely personal history of these changes as they have played out in the experimental study of reference. Our goal is not a complete history — an impossible ambition — but a better understanding of what reference really is.
