標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Evidence; Raymond Emson Textbook 1999Latest edition Raymond Emson 1999 criminal evidence.Immunity.law.Liability [打印本頁] 作者: notable 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 19:07
書目名稱Evidence影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Evidence影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Evidence網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Evidence網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Evidence被引頻次
書目名稱Evidence被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Evidence年度引用
書目名稱Evidence年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Evidence讀者反饋
書目名稱Evidence讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: penance 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 21:59 作者: Haphazard 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 03:57
Textbook 1999Latest editions and policies which have influenced the evolution of the law, examining the fundamentals not the minutiae.The book will satisfy the needs of undergraduates approaching the subject at an academic level while also providing a clear and up-to-date exposition of the law for students on the LPC and BVC.作者: 蓋他為秘密 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 08:05
The Role of the State in Development,In . v. . [1988] 1 WLR 7 HL, in a speech with which the rest of the House of Lords agreed, Lord Havers said (at p. 11):作者: 諷刺滑稽戲劇 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 11:52
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1312-9In . v. . (No.2) [1992] 1 WLR 887 CA Balcombe . said (at p. 899):作者: 軟膏 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 14:26
The Scope of the Hearsay Rule,In . v. . [1988] 1 WLR 7 HL, in a speech with which the rest of the House of Lords agreed, Lord Havers said (at p. 11):作者: 軟膏 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 17:31 作者: 痛打 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:30
Raymond EmsonStudentoriented with the principal areas of Evidence covered in depth. Priced competitively to suit the budget of students. Includes the underlying principles and policy considerations which explain w作者: freight 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 02:35
Macmillan Law Mastershttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/317504.jpg作者: Digitalis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 08:08
Johannes J?ger,Elisabeth Springlery day to determine, inter alia, whether evidence ought to be admitted, the use which may be made of evidence once it has been admitted, and the way in which witnesses may be questioned. It is a body of law which must be known and understood thoroughly by any advocate (but particularly by those who p作者: refraction 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 12:07 作者: cajole 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 16:59 作者: V切開 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 20:54 作者: PAD416 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:32
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29949-0which is adverse to his case. Such admissions have long been recognised as an exception to the hearsay rule and are thus admissible to prove the truth of the matters stated. Confessions tendered by the prosecution are now governed by s. 76 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (‘PACE’), while作者: Solace 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 05:18 作者: 注意 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 08:31
https://doi.org/10.1007/b117253ad been searched by Kenyan police officers and, it was alleged, found to be in unlawful possession of two rounds of ammunition, a capital offence under the Emergency Regulations then in force. The law provided that only an officer of or above the rank of assistant inspector could lawfully search per作者: blister 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 13:05 作者: Obsessed 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:49 作者: 干旱 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 20:58 作者: elucidate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 01:32 作者: Influx 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 04:10 作者: corpus-callosum 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 09:47 作者: APRON 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 13:30
Nanostructure Science and Technologyrmine whether evidence is logically relevant to a matter requiring proof the judge must formulate a generalisation from his own experience and what he understands to be conventional wisdom (see 3.1.1 .). The problem is that some aspects of human life are more widely understood than others, and what 作者: Ovulation 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 18:01 作者: adjacent 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 23:51
erlying principles and policy considerations which explain w.Evidence. is a student-oriented approach to the subject in a market dominated by overly detailed and weighty books.It explains in depth the principles and policies which have influenced the evolution of the law, examining the fundamentals 作者: Endearing 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 00:23 作者: 南極 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 06:40 作者: BAN 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 09:43
Emerging Methods in Family Researchect to specific exceptions) because the possibility of mistake or fabrication renders such evidence generally unreliable. Confessions are inadmissible if obtained in consequence of torture or other oppressive interrogatory techniques because a person should not be forced into incriminating himself.作者: Debate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:09
Diana P. Baumann,Andrew Ingalls to prove any disputed issue of fact, what is meant by ‘proof’ in this context, what happens when there is no evidence in support of or against a particular factual proposition, and the extent to which the tribunal of fact can rely on its own knowledge.作者: 傳授知識(shí) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 17:13
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137450661charged, such cross-examination is only indirectly relevant to his guilt. It is intended to show that because of his dissolute character his testimony, and therefore his defence, should not be believed by the jury or magistrates.作者: Obloquy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 00:21
Nanostructure Science and Technologywhich means of course that what might appear to be a valid generalisation to one generation could quite possibly be considered absurd by another. Problems such as these have bedevilled the law relating to the relevance of the complainant’s sexual experience in cases where the accused is alleged to have committed a sexual offence on her.作者: instructive 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 01:52 作者: 繞著哥哥問 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:50 作者: 思想靈活 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 10:31
Preliminaries,t issue (15.1 .). The facts in issue depend on the substantive law and what, if anything, has been ‘formally admitted’ by the parties. The substantive law identifies the facts in issue for the type of case before the court, but once a fact has been formally admitted it ceases to be in issue and need not be proved (15.6.3 .).作者: 地名表 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 17:02
Evidence Obtained by Unlawful or Unfair Means,sons suspected of being in possession of ammunition, yet neither officer involved was of such rank. Consequently the evidence purportedly found on Kuruma had been obtained unlawfully and he appealed against his conviction on the ground that it should not have been admitted. Dismissing the appeal Lord Goddard . said (at pp. 203–4):作者: ICLE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 18:15
Disclosure and Public Interest Immunity,ect to specific exceptions) because the possibility of mistake or fabrication renders such evidence generally unreliable. Confessions are inadmissible if obtained in consequence of torture or other oppressive interrogatory techniques because a person should not be forced into incriminating himself.作者: Bronchial-Tubes 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:52 作者: 返老還童 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 03:23
not the minutiae.The book will satisfy the needs of undergraduates approaching the subject at an academic level while also providing a clear and up-to-date exposition of the law for students on the LPC and BVC.作者: 永久 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 09:29
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29949-0 not conclusive evidence of any fact admitted, however, and the party who made it may adduce other evidence at the trial to show why it should not be relied on. It is with informal admissions and confessions that this chapter is concerned.作者: BILIO 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 13:02 作者: 整潔 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 17:47
Textbook 1999Latest editions and policies which have influenced the evolution of the law, examining the fundamentals not the minutiae.The book will satisfy the needs of undergraduates approaching the subject at an academic level while also providing a clear and up-to-date exposition of the law for students on the LPC and BVC.作者: Intercept 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 21:26
Introduction,y day to determine, inter alia, whether evidence ought to be admitted, the use which may be made of evidence once it has been admitted, and the way in which witnesses may be questioned. It is a body of law which must be known and understood thoroughly by any advocate (but particularly by those who p作者: Anticoagulant 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 01:24
Preliminaries, accused or civil defendant must prove in order to establish his defence. The term ‘ultimate probandum’ is sometimes used to represent what the prosecution or plaintiff must ultimately prove. The party who is obliged to prove a particular fact in issue is said to bear the ‘legal burden of proof’ tha作者: BLAZE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 05:47 作者: 能量守恒 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 07:55 作者: 廣大 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 12:11 作者: emulsify 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 18:06 作者: narcissism 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 23:43 作者: DEVIL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 00:38 作者: 暗指 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 05:06
Opinion Evidence, judgment will depend. In order to come to a decision on these issues the tribunal of fact is obliged to consider, and entitled to draw inferences from, all the available evidence including the testimony of any witnesses who have been called. Witnesses are generally limited to testifying as to facts作者: 灰姑娘 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 12:14 作者: 雪崩 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 16:01
Privilege,idence is unreliable, or likely to prejudice the tribunal of fact against a party, but because the public interest militating against disclosure is deemed to outweigh the public interest in the due administration of justice. Highly probative and reliable evidence may also be withheld on the ground o作者: 一個(gè)攪動(dòng)不安 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 16:46
The Mechanics of Proof,dence. The law of evidence sets out the principles and rules which determine whether evidence is admissible and, if so, whether it ought to be admitted, but it is also concerned with the process of proof itself. For a trial to function effectively it is necessary to understand which party is obliged作者: CANON 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 21:14 作者: Mets552 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 01:58 作者: aggrieve 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 05:37
Introduction,nate, and the student or advocate will only be able to support his or her submissions on what the law is, or on what it ought to be, if the subject has been studied at an academic level and the principles and considerations of policy underlying its evolution understood. One can, for example, only co作者: 鍍金 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 11:26
Silence as Evidence,vant circumstances will include the silent party’s personality, the context of any questioning or allegation, the frame of mind of the persons present and the seriousness of the occasion. Silence is generally an unreliable source from which to draw inferences because people remain silent for so many
