標(biāo)題: Titlebook: European E-Democracy in Practice; Leonhard Hennen,Ira van Keulen,Rasmus ?jvind Niels Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and T [打印本頁] 作者: 卑賤 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 17:39
書目名稱European E-Democracy in Practice影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱European E-Democracy in Practice影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱European E-Democracy in Practice網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱European E-Democracy in Practice網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱European E-Democracy in Practice被引頻次
書目名稱European E-Democracy in Practice被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱European E-Democracy in Practice年度引用
書目名稱European E-Democracy in Practice年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱European E-Democracy in Practice讀者反饋
書目名稱European E-Democracy in Practice讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 冰河期 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 23:05
E-Democracy: Conceptual Foundations and Recent Trendstical insights on the interplay between Internet-based communication and democratic processes. To this end, different normative views, aims and approaches of e-democracy are presented and systematically related to the central tenets of the main models of democracy. As e-participation plays an essent作者: perpetual 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 01:02
E-Democracy and the European Public Sphereblem and the debate about European citizenship and European identity—mainly in the light of insights from the EU crisis. This is followed by reflections on the recent discussion on the state of the mass media-based European public sphere. Finally, the author discusses the state of research on the In作者: 雄偉 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 05:32 作者: GUEER 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:26 作者: Obligatory 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 16:49
Parliamentary Monitoringordnetenwatch.de. Only the German tool is interactive; it also offers opportunities to ask questions to MPs, comment their voting behaviour and sign petitions. In their description and analysis of both cases, the authors put a strong focus on the participatory process and practical experiences of us作者: Obligatory 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 17:59 作者: 雕鏤 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 22:42 作者: 允許 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 02:07
Formal Agenda-Setting (European Level)ns’ Initiative, Futurium, Your Voice in Europe, and European Citizens’ Consultations). The authors place a strong focus on the participatory process and practical experiences. For a better understanding of these tools and how they are used in practice, interviews were conducted with administrators a作者: Charitable 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 09:22
Non-binding Decision-Makingdemos, the Italian Five Star Movement and the German Pirate Party) aiming for direct democracy and more transparency. The other three tools are online participatory budgeting (PB) tools initiated by municipalities (the Brazilian city Belo Horizonte, the French capital Paris and the Icelandic capital作者: 無意 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:02
Binding Decision-Makingescribe different practices of online ballots. Relevant contextual factors of the digital tools with regard to the key dimensions input legitimacy, throughput legitimacy and output legitimacy are assessed in order to better understand the role these digital tools can play in the political decision-m作者: 占卜者 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:57
Assessing Tools for E-Democracy: Comparative Analysis of the Case Studiesve Analysis (csQCA) to study which conditions lead to actual impact of the tools on policy, (1) decision-making or (2) agenda-setting. Sixteen conditions identified from the literature review are compared. Ultimately, the most important conditions for successful e-participation identified by the aut作者: 合群 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 21:31 作者: legislate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:27 作者: dearth 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 04:00
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-13537-1sengagement from the European democratic processes and distance of the European citizens from EU institutions remains a major problem. This short chapter explains furthermore how the data collection and analysis of the 22 cases have been done. Special attention is paid to explaining the method of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA).作者: excrete 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 08:53
Introduction to the Case Study Researchsengagement from the European democratic processes and distance of the European citizens from EU institutions remains a major problem. This short chapter explains furthermore how the data collection and analysis of the 22 cases have been done. Special attention is paid to explaining the method of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA).作者: Daily-Value 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 11:51 作者: 皮薩 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 18:35 作者: 揮舞 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 22:52 作者: altruism 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 01:35 作者: 高爾夫 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 04:20 作者: 神化怪物 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 09:40 作者: Antimicrobial 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 13:39
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-20240-0onditions needed to realise the democratic potential of the broad scope of tools, instruments and procedures to strengthen the ties between established processes of representative democratic decision-making and its constituencies, with a particular view to political communication and decision-making作者: 牛的細(xì)微差別 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 17:43
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-91118-7tical insights on the interplay between Internet-based communication and democratic processes. To this end, different normative views, aims and approaches of e-democracy are presented and systematically related to the central tenets of the main models of democracy. As e-participation plays an essent作者: genuine 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 20:03
Die ideale Minderheitsregierungblem and the debate about European citizenship and European identity—mainly in the light of insights from the EU crisis. This is followed by reflections on the recent discussion on the state of the mass media-based European public sphere. Finally, the author discusses the state of research on the In作者: 切割 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:43 作者: Hemiparesis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 04:23
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-13537-1. The authors indicate how the cases were selected based on different criteria such as diversity of institutional contexts and scales, geographical diversity and different types of citizen involvement. Each of the cases is described based on an evaluation framework for assessing the digital tools. T作者: aspersion 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 08:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-91722-6ordnetenwatch.de. Only the German tool is interactive; it also offers opportunities to ask questions to MPs, comment their voting behaviour and sign petitions. In their description and analysis of both cases, the authors put a strong focus on the participatory process and practical experiences of us作者: 熱烈的歡迎 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:21
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-92695-2: the Dutch website petities.nl and the Finnish Avoin Ministeri? (Open Ministry) which ceased to exist but was aimed to help citizens’ initiatives such as submitting a bill. Both are organised bottom-up. In their description and analysis of both cases, the authors put a strong focus on the participa作者: institute 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:34
Joseph Mathieu,Carl Alexander Roosal level (crowdsourcing for a constitution in Iceland, Future Melbourne Wiki, the Slovenian Predlagam.vladi.si, participatory budgeting in Berlin Lichtenberg and the Dutch internetconsultation.nl). The authors place a strong focus on the participatory process and practical experiences. For a better 作者: 國家明智 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 23:27
Die industrielle Investitionsentscheidungns’ Initiative, Futurium, Your Voice in Europe, and European Citizens’ Consultations). The authors place a strong focus on the participatory process and practical experiences. For a better understanding of these tools and how they are used in practice, interviews were conducted with administrators a作者: BILIO 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 04:58 作者: 事與愿違 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:56 作者: 嫌惡 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 13:21 作者: 植物群 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 17:41
Das Clifford-Kleinsche Raumformenproblem,e to the challenges to e-participation, which arise out of current institutional designs, the authors make creative use of the research results presented earlier in the book to suggest ‘low-hanging fruits’ for practical reform. The challenges addressed include the relative weakness of individual cit作者: 債務(wù) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 19:35
978-3-030-27186-2The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020作者: 厭食癥 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:45 作者: 雪崩 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 02:46
Studies in Digital Politics and Governancehttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/316770.jpg作者: aerobic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 09:37
Leonhard Hennen,Ira van Keulen,Rasmus ?jvind Niels作者: 咯咯笑 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 12:26 作者: 他一致 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 15:46 作者: 前面 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 19:25 作者: 蝕刻術(shù) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 02:03
Experience with Digital Tools in Different Types of e-Participationter instrument. A special section examines e-participation at EU-level, from deliberative citizens’ involvement projects and e-consultation to the European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) and e-petitions to the European Parliament. Findings show that digital tools enhance direct and participative democra作者: Tractable 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 03:18 作者: Expressly 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 07:31 作者: bronchiole 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 14:56 作者: intelligible 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 17:20
Binding Decision-Makingtors for an often-claimed increase of turnout exist, and, in general, scaling up online elections to a larger framework than the rather restricted ones analysed in this chapter requires major efforts with regard to legal, technical and social aspects.作者: Bronchial-Tubes 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 21:46
