標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Ethics, Society and Politics: Themes from the Philosophy of Peter Winch; Michael Campbell,Lynette Reid Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applica [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: 可怖 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 19:03
書目名稱Ethics, Society and Politics: Themes from the Philosophy of Peter Winch影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Ethics, Society and Politics: Themes from the Philosophy of Peter Winch影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Ethics, Society and Politics: Themes from the Philosophy of Peter Winch網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Ethics, Society and Politics: Themes from the Philosophy of Peter Winch網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Ethics, Society and Politics: Themes from the Philosophy of Peter Winch被引頻次
書目名稱Ethics, Society and Politics: Themes from the Philosophy of Peter Winch被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Ethics, Society and Politics: Themes from the Philosophy of Peter Winch年度引用
書目名稱Ethics, Society and Politics: Themes from the Philosophy of Peter Winch年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Ethics, Society and Politics: Themes from the Philosophy of Peter Winch讀者反饋
書目名稱Ethics, Society and Politics: Themes from the Philosophy of Peter Winch讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: ARBOR 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:16
Ethics, Society and Politics: Themes from the Philosophy of Peter Winch978-3-030-40742-1Series ISSN 2520-1514 Series E-ISSN 2520-1522 作者: NAG 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 01:50 作者: 廣告 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 05:16 作者: OWL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 09:54 作者: 商談 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 15:20
Johannes Feest,Wolfgang Lestingnts. In contrast, he uses examples from within the narratives of serious works of literature in order to focus upon the ways in which a particular agent’s own perception of a particular situation informs their response to it. In this way, he is applying Wittgenstein’s admonishment not just to say wh作者: 商談 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 18:55
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-38172-4osophy of mind and action. In one strand in these discussions Winch argues that certain familiar tendencies to say how things . be in ethics spring from a mistaken metaphysical picture of “the will”. However, other strands in his discussions raise the possibility that the inclinations in our thinkin作者: 寵愛 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 21:22 作者: Inelasticity 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 01:36 作者: capsule 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 09:08 作者: 是突襲 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 11:25 作者: 飾帶 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 15:44
Soft Tissue Modelling from 3D Scanned Data,eneration and a younger, and second a pattern of political and moral commentary more subtle and varied than we might have expected. Our first example, Monteverdi’s . (1642/1931) explores the conflict between the philosopher, Seneca, and his protégé, the Roman Emperor, Nero. Seneca is executed for de作者: miniature 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 19:56
Deformable Meshes for Automatic Segmentationrences on a diverse range of issues in his works, but also by several lectures and seminars he delivered on this thinker. A reconstruction of his interpretation of Spinoza’s system, which unites epistemological, metaphysical and ethical considerations as mutually dependent, brings to the fore Winch’作者: ALLEY 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 22:54
Breast Strain Imaging: A Cad Framework,ncepts developed independently by Wittgenstein. The comparative analysis illustrates that for both these Socratic philosophers, theory corresponds to daily experience, a real “way of life” which in itself gives rise to an ethical-philosophical pragmatics that informs the most intimate ontological di作者: Monocle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 04:11 作者: 突變 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 08:55 作者: 鎮(zhèn)痛劑 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 11:44 作者: innate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:00
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1721-3ganizer(s), that there might be scientifically determinable foundations for a universal human morality. “I do not know exactly how Professor Schn?delbach himself conceives this matter”, he concedes. But Winch’s preferred model, if you will permit me something obvious, is “[T]hese phenomena have no o作者: forager 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 21:50
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1893-0d example. On Winch’s view, understanding a social institution or practice involves a grasp of its conceptual structure and this itself should be the subject of empirical investigation. Winch’s own criticism of his earlier position is compared with Rush Rhees’s critique of the Builders example in Wi作者: 付出 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 00:00
Diffusive Mass Transfer by Solution, misreading of the book and concludes with how the book can continue to be relevant for contemporary philosophy of social science and critical social inquiry. Resisting the canonical reception in the philosophy of social science, it follows the strands in the book that emphasize the inseparability o作者: 使迷醉 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 03:45
Pull-Aparts, Boudins and Brittle Faults,ous remark in the . (PI), that ‘My attitude to him is an attitude towards a soul.’ In ISS Winch claims that animals, his example is of dogs, cannot go on in the same way, cannot learn to follow a rule. Winch says, for example, as far as the dog goes, there can be no question of the ‘reflective appli作者: 轉(zhuǎn)向 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 10:36 作者: 向外供接觸 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 15:04
2520-1514 sophy?are interdependent. As a result, the volume as a whole shows unity in diversity and provides an example of a manner of philosophising in which different approaches and sub-disciplines are placed in dialog978-3-030-40744-5978-3-030-40742-1Series ISSN 2520-1514 Series E-ISSN 2520-1522 作者: Osteons 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 15:51 作者: cauda-equina 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 20:34 作者: Precursor 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 00:42 作者: Rotator-Cuff 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 06:46 作者: 欺騙世家 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 11:45
Synthesis Lectures on Computer Vision us in (desired, imagined or actualized) encounters with other human beings. Through a discussion of Maggie Nelson’s . (2015), I then consider the ethical character of such encounters, to show how varying and conflicting conceptions about sexual morality, and to some extent, politics, in our present作者: diskitis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 15:30
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1721-3inch’s hands, a fundamental challenge to the standard history and practice of philosophy. In his 1987 paper, “Einheit: Voraussetzung oder Forderung”, Winch applies these principles to the example of an empirical foundationalism, which expects the social sciences to discover ‘cultural universals’ on 作者: 補(bǔ)助 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:32
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1893-0distinction is drawn between the concept of education and various operative conceptions which are the province of the empirical as well as the normative researcher. This approach to the study of education is illustrated through an extended example and the possibilities for an empirical investigation作者: Antagonism 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 21:46 作者: Hdl348 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 01:07 作者: Grasping 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 08:51 作者: Yag-Capsulotomy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 10:31 作者: Gingivitis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 16:57
Moral Agency,is a fact that someone abused their authority, then they are answerable both to themselves and to others for their lack of integrity. And although the principles of morality may differ radically at different times and across different cultures, this does not imply any simplistic relativism in the un作者: 閹割 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 20:43
,“What Justifies the Justifications?” Winch on Punishment and Justice,larify this argument, partly by reference to the distinction between punishment and revenge. I end by discussing a problematic remark of Winch’s in which he seems once more to open up the possibility of asking for a wholesale justification of punishment.作者: 我不重要 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:00 作者: Hippocampus 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 02:48 作者: SLUMP 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 07:36
Winch on First Philosophy: Unity and Multiplicity,inch’s hands, a fundamental challenge to the standard history and practice of philosophy. In his 1987 paper, “Einheit: Voraussetzung oder Forderung”, Winch applies these principles to the example of an empirical foundationalism, which expects the social sciences to discover ‘cultural universals’ on 作者: OVER 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 14:30
,Researching Education: Perspectives from Winch’s Approach to the Social Sciences,distinction is drawn between the concept of education and various operative conceptions which are the province of the empirical as well as the normative researcher. This approach to the study of education is illustrated through an extended example and the possibilities for an empirical investigation作者: Texture 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 16:19
,“Don’t Mention the Idea of a Social Science”: The Legacy of an Idea,e book that focus on the irreducibly ethical character of philosophical and social inquiry, further supported by external sources. The essay then concludes with opening the work up to current debates in the philosophy of social science and critical social theory, thus arguing for the book’s continue作者: cathartic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 19:02
Winch and Animal Minds,her party in this shared activity? The reference to a shared activity is important here. For the way in Winch makes his point throws into doubt the idea that there is in a case like this (with an animal) any such thing as a shared activity. Using an example of the way in which children play games wi作者: ALTER 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 23:43 作者: BUCK 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 05:19 作者: Processes 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 10:01
Moral Agency,nts. In contrast, he uses examples from within the narratives of serious works of literature in order to focus upon the ways in which a particular agent’s own perception of a particular situation informs their response to it. In this way, he is applying Wittgenstein’s admonishment not just to say wh作者: amyloid 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 12:40
Ethics and Action,osophy of mind and action. In one strand in these discussions Winch argues that certain familiar tendencies to say how things . be in ethics spring from a mistaken metaphysical picture of “the will”. However, other strands in his discussions raise the possibility that the inclinations in our thinkin作者: 惰性女人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 17:46 作者: Patrimony 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 23:35
Winch on Punishment: Contested Concepts, Justification, and Primitive Reactions, to rescue the intelligibility of a cluster of concepts loosely characterized as retributive concepts, and his characterization that an important philosophical problem—or set of problems—about punishment arise from what I call the intensionality of punishment—what it is for punishment to be “for” a 作者: Prophylaxis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 01:15
Political Philosophy and the Primacy of Agency,was the critique of classical social contract theory. His second theme is best characterised as the primacy of agency over spectatorship. This long-term philosophical commitment is distinct from another central theme for Winch, his emphasis on particular cases. In ethics and politics, the perspectiv作者: evaculate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 06:50
,Winch on Political Authority &?Obedience,nts from Wittgenstein’s . To do?so he argues against?the desire-belief conception of action, the view that any?reasonable action, including?obedience, is based on justified belief. He argues instead that rationality is itself based on primitive and habitual trust obedience of authority, and that far作者: Trabeculoplasty 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 09:41 作者: 大方不好 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 14:19
,The Identity of Man?– Winch Between Spinoza, Weil, and Wittgenstein,rences on a diverse range of issues in his works, but also by several lectures and seminars he delivered on this thinker. A reconstruction of his interpretation of Spinoza’s system, which unites epistemological, metaphysical and ethical considerations as mutually dependent, brings to the fore Winch’作者: 卷發(fā) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 17:08
,Weil and Wittgenstein in Winch’s “Reading”: Philosophy as a Way of Life,ncepts developed independently by Wittgenstein. The comparative analysis illustrates that for both these Socratic philosophers, theory corresponds to daily experience, a real “way of life” which in itself gives rise to an ethical-philosophical pragmatics that informs the most intimate ontological di作者: POLYP 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 21:46 作者: Binge-Drinking 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 01:03
,Between Discovery and Decision: Winch’s Critique of the Universalizability of Moral Judgment Revisin superseded, in fact, on closer examination it presents a viewpoint which is missing from modern mainstream metaethics. I will first review Winch’s criticism of the universalizability thesis, then examine some responses to that criticism. Finally, I will reconsider Winch’s proposals from a differen作者: 身心疲憊 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 08:25
,The Good and Bad in Sexual Relations: A Reconsideration of Winch’s Limiting Notions,death, are not to be considered as events or experiences in the world, but rather as having a more fundamental role in shaping what we make sense of as human life and morality. In this article, I discuss some senses in which sexual relations, perceived as such a “l(fā)imiting notion”, can be said to “de作者: 無禮回復(fù) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 11:51
Winch on First Philosophy: Unity and Multiplicity,ganizer(s), that there might be scientifically determinable foundations for a universal human morality. “I do not know exactly how Professor Schn?delbach himself conceives this matter”, he concedes. But Winch’s preferred model, if you will permit me something obvious, is “[T]hese phenomena have no o