標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Ethics, Self-Study Research Methodology and Teacher Education; Robyn Brandenburg,Sharon McDonough Book 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte [打印本頁] 作者: invigorating 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 19:06
書目名稱Ethics, Self-Study Research Methodology and Teacher Education影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Ethics, Self-Study Research Methodology and Teacher Education影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Ethics, Self-Study Research Methodology and Teacher Education網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Ethics, Self-Study Research Methodology and Teacher Education網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Ethics, Self-Study Research Methodology and Teacher Education被引頻次
書目名稱Ethics, Self-Study Research Methodology and Teacher Education被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Ethics, Self-Study Research Methodology and Teacher Education年度引用
書目名稱Ethics, Self-Study Research Methodology and Teacher Education年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Ethics, Self-Study Research Methodology and Teacher Education讀者反饋
書目名稱Ethics, Self-Study Research Methodology and Teacher Education讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 思想流動(dòng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 22:23 作者: diathermy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 01:42
Ethical Dilemmas of a Self-Study Researcher: A Narrative Analysis of Ethics in the Process of S-STE our work between the moral and the ethical. We attend to ethical dilemmas of relationship, from attending to the particular, of vulnerability, from openness, of interpretation through dialogue, from ontology.作者: 易怒 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 08:23 作者: Heretical 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 11:08 作者: Prophylaxis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 13:17
Book 2019 require an ongoing ethical reflexivity. In addition, the book identifies, documents and collates the collective experiences of self-study researchers and sheds new light on the role and impact of ethics, ethical dilemmas and ensuing decisions for education researchers..The book considers the ethica作者: Prophylaxis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 18:53
1875-3620 examining ethics in context based on their own experiences aThis book examines the nuanced and situated experiences of self-study researchers. It explores the ways in which ethics are dynamic, idiosyncratic and require an ongoing ethical reflexivity. In addition, the book identifies, documents and c作者: Evolve 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 23:52 作者: BLUSH 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 04:57
What Is Data and Analytics Strategy,tive self-study we have conducted for the last 5?years on our collaborative group supervision of Master’s projects and include research journals, notes from meetings, and feedback from and communication with students. We focus on incidents we have identified as deserving ethical consideration.作者: aplomb 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 06:57
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230303072ectives in this book to present a thematic analysis of the contributions within the volume. In doing so, we identify the concepts and discourses associated with ethics in self-study that are dominant, present those that are silent or marginalised and offer suggestions for future research.作者: diathermy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 11:43 作者: 厚臉皮 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 17:18 作者: 多產(chǎn)魚 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 18:35 作者: GUISE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 01:54
Ethics, Self-Study Research Methodology and Teacher Education作者: commune 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 05:43
Do Deficits and the Debt Matter?,volume specifically examines the role of ethics in self-study research. In many ways, the self-study ethics research presented in this volume reflects what has been described as “metaethics” which is a practice that “asks questions about the meaning of ethical words, the logic of justifying moral de作者: 拾落穗 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 08:00
Deficit Irrigation and Water Conservation,f children as their primary concern. In many ways, theon, those who aim to study their practice do so . they take their ethical commitment to children seriously?– it is, as Pinnegar and Hamilton (2009) have argued, an ontological commitment.作者: 手段 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 14:32
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22757-8people are unavoidably implicated. Instead of reliability and validity verifying S-STEP’s truth claims as is the case with the positivist paradigm, verisimilitude (lifelikeness) (Bruner, 2010) and trustworthiness (Mishler, 1990) are two main qualities that other teachers, teacher educators, and rese作者: Foregery 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:10
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501072tive culture of teaching assumes that teaching is kept private. Teaching experiences are usually not shared with teaching colleagues, yet teaching is utterly public to those one is teaching. The ethical reflective turn in self-study research can help to shift the public nature of the classroom from 作者: duplicate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 20:52 作者: Fluctuate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 00:42 作者: choleretic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 05:25
Ethics, Self-Study Research Methodology and Teacher Education,volume specifically examines the role of ethics in self-study research. In many ways, the self-study ethics research presented in this volume reflects what has been described as “metaethics” which is a practice that “asks questions about the meaning of ethical words, the logic of justifying moral de作者: 充滿人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 08:31 作者: 松緊帶 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 13:51 作者: Gourmet 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 16:00
Making the Ethical Reflective Turn in Self-Study of Teacher Education Practice Research,tive culture of teaching assumes that teaching is kept private. Teaching experiences are usually not shared with teaching colleagues, yet teaching is utterly public to those one is teaching. The ethical reflective turn in self-study research can help to shift the public nature of the classroom from 作者: gastritis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 22:44
Risk Taking in Public Spaces: Ethical Considerations of Self-Study Research,ve it. This level of introspection and honesty can leave a researcher and other participants in the study vulnerable and open to criticism and judgement. Furthermore, self-study research does not follow the methodological approaches used in many other types of research, meaning that ethical consider作者: Sinus-Rhythm 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:28
Book 2019rs to be ever-present and re-engaged with the ethics of their own projects, from the development, through to the dissemination of their work..Readers will gain a deeper understanding of ethics, ethical perspectives and practices in the field of self-study research..作者: Offbeat 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 05:28 作者: 傻 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 09:55 作者: 表皮 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:34 作者: 玷污 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 20:02
978-981-32-9137-9Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019作者: graphy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 22:58 作者: META 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 04:38 作者: Commonwealth 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 07:29
Deficit Irrigation and Water Conservation,w Boards, IRBs, may adopt strangely inconsistent stances?– either claiming that doing self-study research will automatically cause an unmanageable power imbalance within a teacher education program or claiming that self-study work does not require ethical review because it is not actually research. 作者: NEG 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 12:05
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22757-81998, p. 236)—is a misnomer (Craig & Curtis, in press). While the research genre unquestionably revolves around self, it always includes others because practices necessarily unfold in the milieus in which we are immersed. We mostly are “assisted selves” because our inquiries are informed directly or作者: 空中 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 15:21
Concerns with the Explanation of Crime,h an exploration of the self, as much as it is of the not-self—the various other individuals that interact with a practitioner-researcher at any given time during a study (Hamilton & Pinnegar, 1998). Conducting research about the self and interacting with others inevitably leads to ethical questions作者: Assemble 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 19:32
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137496195 journey from practitioner to practitioner researcher, through the use of self-study as a research methdology. It provides a framework to support other practitioners wanting to make the same journey to practitioner researcher, and suggests ways to attend to the ethical dilemmas created by the tensio作者: 頑固 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 23:46 作者: 燦爛 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 04:37
Shariah and the Objectives of Islamic Law researched, place, practice, context, interpretation, presentation, and institutional review boards (IRB). We then reconsidered our categorization using the characteristics of intimate scholarship as a framework. These characteristics include relationship, vulnerability, ontology, dialogue, and ope作者: 財(cái)產(chǎn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 07:09
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501072of self-study of teacher education practices. In addition to developing the idea of an ethical reflective turn in the context of self-study research, we draw on personal cases of self-study research that involved interactions with or collaborations with students. These cases consider interactions bo作者: invade 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 14:30
Mapping the Space of Postmodernism or the researcher, but inevitably concerns others, given that the full title of the research methodology is the self-study of teacher education practices (Bullough & Pinnegar, 2001; LaBoskey, 2004). Teacher education practices almost always involve our students, but we may also involve others, such作者: 不能逃避 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 16:58
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230303072 (p. 135) highlights the inherent challenges when considering issues of ethics in self-study research. While we might seek to identify ethical tensions, issues and dilemmas in advance, as we see from the contributions in this volume, the consideration of ethics is a dynamic, emergent and reflective 作者: dendrites 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 19:56 作者: 背帶 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 00:39
Returning to First Principles: Self-Study and , as Ethical Approaches to Teaching,w Boards, IRBs, may adopt strangely inconsistent stances?– either claiming that doing self-study research will automatically cause an unmanageable power imbalance within a teacher education program or claiming that self-study work does not require ethical review because it is not actually research. 作者: 售穴 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 04:01 作者: 顯微鏡 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 08:00 作者: 無畏 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 13:16
Navigating a Mirror Maze While Managing to Jump Ethics Hurdles, journey from practitioner to practitioner researcher, through the use of self-study as a research methdology. It provides a framework to support other practitioners wanting to make the same journey to practitioner researcher, and suggests ways to attend to the ethical dilemmas created by the tensio作者: Amorous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 16:31
