標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Ethics without Self, Dharma without Atman; Western and Buddhist Gordon F. Davis Book 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Spr [打印本頁] 作者: necrosis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 16:08
書目名稱Ethics without Self, Dharma without Atman影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Ethics without Self, Dharma without Atman影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Ethics without Self, Dharma without Atman網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Ethics without Self, Dharma without Atman網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Ethics without Self, Dharma without Atman被引頻次
書目名稱Ethics without Self, Dharma without Atman被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Ethics without Self, Dharma without Atman年度引用
書目名稱Ethics without Self, Dharma without Atman年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Ethics without Self, Dharma without Atman讀者反饋
書目名稱Ethics without Self, Dharma without Atman讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: falsehood 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 22:47
Self-Sceptical Ethics and Selfless Morality: A Historical and Cross-Cultural Overview,th an overview of the various perspectives presented by the other contributors to this volume, and some common threads running through different segments of the volume; for example, some perspectives favour reductionist accounts of selfhood, while some favour non-reductionist accounts, and this diff作者: Amorous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 01:45
The Ethics of Self-Knowledge in Platonic and Buddhist Philosophy,hapter closes with a review of an apparent tension, shared by both traditions, between the goals of embodied social virtue and world-transcendence. The Platonic philosopher and the Mahayāna Bodhisattva both experience a liberating insight which motivates them to return to the “cave” of social servic作者: 不在灌木叢中 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 05:26
Detachment in Buddhist and Stoic Ethics: , and , and Equanimity,mpassion and is conceived of as a tool for virtuous emotional engagement. This model challenges some influential interpretations of Buddhist conceptions of detachment that reduce them to one of the Stoic models, either the extirpation of emotions or resilience to threat to agency.作者: 錯(cuò)事 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 09:15 作者: 不易燃 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 16:42 作者: 不易燃 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 20:20 作者: 欲望 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 23:02 作者: RECUR 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:19
Selfless Care? Heidegger and ,,of the self as a single entity but nonetheless affirms the value of assertive will to power, an ideal that is the opposite of Buddhist selflessness.?An exploration of these themes through a comparative focus on Heidegger and . helps to identify various senses in which the self could be said to “be” 作者: Calculus 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 07:44
,Echoes of Anattā and Buddhist Ethics in William James and Bertrand Russell,ions of self-transcendence are treated sympathetically. The chapter ends with a consideration of various points of contact between James, Russell, and Buddhism. Russell, a friend and interlocutor of James, was impressed by aspects of Buddhism from an early age, and I discuss and examine the parallel作者: 溫和女孩 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 10:38
,Altruism in the Charnel Ground: ?āntideva and Parfit on Anātman, Reductionism and Benevolence, that claims normative implications do not follow from Parfit’s reductionism.?This objection, I argue, also applies to ?āntideva.?Although her argument is probably effective against Parfit, in the final section I explain how Buddhist claims about impermanence and suffering provide a response to Wolf作者: Cantankerous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 17:09
,Variations on Anātman: Buddhist Themes in Deep Ecology and in Future-Directed Environmental Ethics,environmental ethics are versions of deep ecology. We sketch a style of environmental ethics that seems to follow from the consequentialist approach of two major contemporary Buddhist philosophers, Mark Siderits and Charles Goodman; we call this approach ‘future-directed’ ecology, to contrast it wit作者: 鐵砧 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 21:01
Construction of invariant measures,th an overview of the various perspectives presented by the other contributors to this volume, and some common threads running through different segments of the volume; for example, some perspectives favour reductionist accounts of selfhood, while some favour non-reductionist accounts, and this diff作者: antidepressant 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 23:15 作者: 危險(xiǎn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 03:26 作者: 小爭吵 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 07:43
objections to my claim that Sextus and Nāgārjuna represent a distinct category of religiosity, I end with reflections on what the study of Sextus and Nāgārjuna could add to contemporary philosophy of religion.作者: Banister 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 11:15 作者: conference 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:59
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14399-1ates one from suffering, for Kant the aim is an agency free of the conceit that interferes with clear moral vision, sound judgement, and dutiful action.??I conclude by responding to objections advanced by Charles Goodman which aim to show that the Kantian position is deeply at odds with Buddhist thi作者: ornithology 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 21:34 作者: 使閉塞 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 23:35
Beginning the Search for Answers,of the self as a single entity but nonetheless affirms the value of assertive will to power, an ideal that is the opposite of Buddhist selflessness.?An exploration of these themes through a comparative focus on Heidegger and . helps to identify various senses in which the self could be said to “be” 作者: myalgia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 04:36 作者: Chivalrous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 07:45
Story Toys: Transmedia Play in LEGO , that claims normative implications do not follow from Parfit’s reductionism.?This objection, I argue, also applies to ?āntideva.?Although her argument is probably effective against Parfit, in the final section I explain how Buddhist claims about impermanence and suffering provide a response to Wolf作者: 打谷工具 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 14:51
The Hunting-versus-scavenging debate,environmental ethics are versions of deep ecology. We sketch a style of environmental ethics that seems to follow from the consequentialist approach of two major contemporary Buddhist philosophers, Mark Siderits and Charles Goodman; we call this approach ‘future-directed’ ecology, to contrast it wit作者: 討人喜歡 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 16:38
Book 2018uestions in metaphysics.?One set of questions addresses how varying conceptions of selfhood relate to moral values (e.g. the concern of self or selves for the well-being of others); another set of questions addresses how a conception of oneself or one’s selves should or should not affect how one thi作者: 收養(yǎng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 21:51 作者: 持久 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 00:41 作者: 機(jī)構(gòu) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 05:36
Detachment in Buddhist and Stoic Ethics: , and , and Equanimity, emotionality, brought on by attachment, both for oneself and others, (ii) the dangers to one’s agency posed by strongly held, but ultimately unstable, attachments, and (iii) the threat to virtuous emotional engagement with others caused by one’s own attachment to them.?The first two kinds of moral 作者: languor 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 11:05
,Skepticism and Religious Practice in Sextus and Nāgārjuna,l?– way of life.?The contemporaneous founder of Madhyamaka Buddhist philosophy, Nāgārjuna, also embodies a form of sceptical practice in pursuit of the spiritual goal of non-attachment, including non-attachment in intellectual matters.?After some preliminary remarks on the relevance of this chapter 作者: FRAUD 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:34
,Spinoza Through the Prism of Later ‘East-West’ Exchanges: Analogues of Buddhist Themes in the , and as some notable critics, were both knowledgeable about, and sympathetic to, aspects of Chinese philosophy, a tradition that included key elements of the Buddhist no-self ontology. Spinoza’s . can be seen as touching on the connection between no-self and compassion that is central to Buddhist philos作者: alcoholism 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:35 作者: 抗體 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 00:13
,Anattā and Ethics: Kantian and Buddhist Themes,e illumination of significant and under-discussed Kantian affinities with Buddhist views of the self and moral psychology.?Unlike its metaphysical counterpart, the contemplative-strategy interpretation understands the doctrine of no-self as a technique of perception undertaken from the practical sta作者: 混沌 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 02:21 作者: dandruff 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 06:44 作者: Palpable 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 13:18 作者: Morose 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 16:55
,Altruism in the Charnel Ground: ?āntideva and Parfit on Anātman, Reductionism and Benevolence,his argument that we ought to commit to impartial benevolence.?A striking feature of this argument is that it appears in a chapter that is largely comprised of meditations designed to develop disenchantment with samsara, including a set of forty verses in which ?āntideva imagines himself in a charne作者: 本土 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 19:52 作者: 肌肉 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 23:45
2211-1107 cope of moral obligation.Is the first book to compare Buddhi.This volume of essays offers direct comparisons of historic Western and Buddhist perspectives on ethics and metaphysics, tracing parallels and contrasts all the way from Plato to the Stoics, Spinoza to Hume, and Schopenhauer through to con作者: 合并 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 05:25 作者: Malfunction 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 08:12
Deconstructing Doctoral Discoursesreflections of Santideva in particular. I do not rest my case on the claim that Hume was indirectly influenced by Buddhist ideas (as has been claimed by others recently, in connection with French intermediaries of the early eighteenth century). In any case, Hume is?– in effect?– a Mādhyamika through and through.作者: synovitis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 12:31
,Hume as a Western Mādhyamika: The Case from Ethics,reflections of Santideva in particular. I do not rest my case on the claim that Hume was indirectly influenced by Buddhist ideas (as has been claimed by others recently, in connection with French intermediaries of the early eighteenth century). In any case, Hume is?– in effect?– a Mādhyamika through and through.作者: gruelling 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 18:26
Construction of invariant measures,y. Variations on a simple self-sceptical argument for moral altruism can be found throughout the Buddhist philosophical tradition, as well as in contemporary Western philosophy, whereas key elements of this approach seem absent from long stretches of pre-modern Western philosophy. This chapter consi作者: persistence 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 22:27
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10145-8ha (in the Pāli Canon) diagnose the primary cause of human suffering as a widespread misunderstanding of the self. They recommend a radical reconceptualization of selfhood as a necessary step toward their ultimate concerns of human well-being (.) and liberation (.). In particular, they argue, we wro作者: 熱心 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 01:32 作者: Ablation 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 06:29
l?– way of life.?The contemporaneous founder of Madhyamaka Buddhist philosophy, Nāgārjuna, also embodies a form of sceptical practice in pursuit of the spiritual goal of non-attachment, including non-attachment in intellectual matters.?After some preliminary remarks on the relevance of this chapter 作者: 甜瓜 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 09:13
Peter Pericles Trifonas,Michael A. Peters as some notable critics, were both knowledgeable about, and sympathetic to, aspects of Chinese philosophy, a tradition that included key elements of the Buddhist no-self ontology. Spinoza’s . can be seen as touching on the connection between no-self and compassion that is central to Buddhist philos作者: 高腳酒杯 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 12:11 作者: Seizure 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 18:12 作者: 倫理學(xué) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 20:06
Human–Computer Interaction Seriesd by their acquaintances with South Asian Buddhist thought. In addition, comparative philosophy scholars have, apart from historical issues of influence, speculated about various ways in which Schopenhauerian or Nietzschean thought might have some significant resonance with various systems of classi作者: Antecedent 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 01:40 作者: Cupping 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 06:44 作者: 側(cè)面左右 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 10:09 作者: ALB 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 14:30
The Hunting-versus-scavenging debate,hist ethics extends outside of the fields of philosophy and religious studies, and has made some significant inroads in ecological discourse in the public sphere. Buddhist ecology nonetheless raises difficult metaphysical questions, including many concerning selfhood. We begin with the seminal origi作者: Pathogen 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 16:42
,Risk and Luhmann’s Systems Theory,My aim in this paper is to chart what I see as parallels between the ontology of self in Charles Taylor’s work and that of various Buddhist ‘no-self’ views, along with parallels between Taylor’s commitment to reviving republican ideas (in a ‘communitarian’ form) and some aspects of Buddhist ethics.
