派博傳思國(guó)際中心

標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley; Ernest Sosa Book 1987 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1987 George Berkeley.Germany. [打印本頁(yè)]

作者: VEER    時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 20:08
書(shū)目名稱Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley讀者反饋學(xué)科排名





作者: Affluence    時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 23:15
Something-I-Know-Not-What: Berkeley on Locke on Substanceof substance into question. His characterization of substance as a “something-I-know-not-what” that we merely suppose to underly the manifest qualities of things led Berkeley, it is claimed, to take the next step, deny that the notion of matter has any meaning at all, and in that way eliminate mater
作者: 憤世嫉俗者    時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 03:01

作者: 咒語(yǔ)    時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 07:40

作者: 權(quán)宜之計(jì)    時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 11:27
Berkeley’s Imaginationhat it is sufficient to establish his immaterialism. He is, he says, “content to put the whole” upon the issue of whether his reader can “conceive it possible for one extended moveable substance, or in general, for any one idea or any thing like an idea, to exist otherwise than in a mind perceiving
作者: 忘恩負(fù)義的人    時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 16:58
Berkeley on “Archetype”” in current use in philosophy, this other title would probably be considered just as acceptable, and long since justified by commentaries on immaterialism. However, Berkeley made a point of showing that some men with a name for learning merely fooled themselves with fine words and scholastic jargon
作者: 忘恩負(fù)義的人    時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 18:54
Divine Ideas and Berkeley’S Proofs of God’s Existencehas argued that Berkeley hardly cared whether God maintains the continuity of the tree in the quad by perceiving it when we do not. In particular, the famous argument which purports to deduce God’s existence from the continuous existence of sensible things is represented by Bennett as no more than a
作者: 止痛藥    時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 21:53
Berkeley’s Divine Language Argumenttient with the . too much apologetics and too little philosophy. There is one apparent exception. The fourth dialogue, ‘The Truth of Theism,’ contains a proof of God’s existence. But on a closer look many have found an unexciting version of the design argument, a version easily slain by Hume. T. E.
作者: Psa617    時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 04:03
Berkeley and Epistemologyo believe in such a thing. For Berkeley himself this was by no means the most important argument. In fact, it is not fully developed in the ., but only in sections 18-20 of the .. The reason for the secondary role accorded this argument by Berkeley is indicated by the opening sentence of section 18:
作者: left-ventricle    時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 06:51
On the Status of Visuals in Berkeley’s he theses presented and the arguments marshalled in their support is, for these sections, no easy task. Sections 48 and 49 are especially hard to interpret. Since this part of . is very important for Berkeley’s presentation of his new philosophical account of vision, a special effort to make sense o
作者: irreparable    時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 12:44

作者: 可忽略    時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 17:16
On the Early Reception of Berkeley in Germanyeley’s name evokes sometimes a vague image — “there was a bishop” — or the trinity’ of “Locke, Berkeley, and Hume.” Often you will find merely misunderstanding, but more frequently there is great ignorance. Some typical elements of the story are these: the first planned translation of the . in Germa
作者: 朋黨派系    時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 20:02
0082-111X conference was organized by the International Berkeley Society, with the support of several institutions and many people (whose help is acknowl- edged below). This volume represents a selection of the lead papers deliv- ered at that conference, most now revised. The Cartesian marriage of Mind and B
作者: Accommodation    時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:38
Demographic Profile of Syrians in Belgium famous argument which purports to deduce God’s existence from the continuous existence of sensible things is represented by Bennett as no more than a two sentence hiccup in the course of the . (Bennett 1968 and 1971).
作者: 束以馬具    時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 04:23
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48044-1 a proof of God’s existence. But on a closer look many have found an unexciting version of the design argument, a version easily slain by Hume. T. E. Jessop, not one to underestimate Berkeley, puts it bluntly: “… the proof is the usual one from effect to cause, not the one peculiar to Berkeley.”
作者: triptans    時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 07:25

作者: FLIT    時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 14:43

作者: PARA    時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:17
Berkeley’s Divine Language Argument a proof of God’s existence. But on a closer look many have found an unexciting version of the design argument, a version easily slain by Hume. T. E. Jessop, not one to underestimate Berkeley, puts it bluntly: “… the proof is the usual one from effect to cause, not the one peculiar to Berkeley.”
作者: 嘲弄    時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 21:01
Berkeley and Immediate Perceptionant notion than his twentieth century successors did in connection with understanding their related notions. So, if we are to grasp what Berkeley had in mind, some interpretive work is in order; Berkeley’s texts, though initially helpful, do not supply all the illumination needed.
作者: calamity    時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 01:00

作者: Optic-Disk    時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 04:48

作者: 懸崖    時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 08:39

作者: vasculitis    時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 15:29
Comparative Development Studiesment of insufficient evidence comes in only to back it up, for readers who may not have been convinced by the impossibility proof. Nonetheless, Berkeley’s epistemological argument is of great interest, both for its own sake and for what it can teach us about the relation between metaphysics and epistemology.
作者: scrape    時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 19:04

作者: 郊外    時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 23:13

作者: Aids209    時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 03:28
Book 1987e was organized by the International Berkeley Society, with the support of several institutions and many people (whose help is acknowl- edged below). This volume represents a selection of the lead papers deliv- ered at that conference, most now revised. The Cartesian marriage of Mind and Body has pr
作者: NICE    時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 04:38
Berkeley on “Archetype”. I shall argue: (I) that “archetypes,” contrary to what is often said, play no role in immaterialism; (II) that Berkeley used the term “archetype” only in response to his adversaries; and (III) that he uses this term, in any account of his own view, only when compelled to by objections made to his philosophy.
作者: Hypopnea    時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 09:30

作者: 憤慨點(diǎn)吧    時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:37
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5638-4Berkeley’s . consist of sometimes isolated, sometimes incomplete sentences without any normal context. Often, one entry deals with one problem; the following with quite another; the next with a third, etc. As one entry sometimes contradicts another, one cannot possibly maintain without considerable qualification that:
作者: 滲入    時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 18:47
A New Approach to Berkeley’s Berkeley’s . consist of sometimes isolated, sometimes incomplete sentences without any normal context. Often, one entry deals with one problem; the following with quite another; the next with a third, etc. As one entry sometimes contradicts another, one cannot possibly maintain without considerable qualification that:
作者: 乏味    時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 21:38

作者: 邪惡的你    時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 02:32
Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley978-94-009-4798-6Series ISSN 0082-111X
作者: 性學(xué)院    時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 07:33
Synthese Historical Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/315368.jpg
作者: seduce    時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 11:01
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4798-6George Berkeley; Germany; Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz; John Locke; body; corpus; epistemology; imagination; in
作者: braggadocio    時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 17:36
Comparative Chemical Mutagenesisand had at least some knowledge of his early philosophy. (Berkeley’s . was published in 1710, when Berkeley was about twenty-five, and Leibniz was in his sixties. When Berkeley died in 1753, Kant was about thirty years old.) Kant’s philosophy — which he himself called “transcendental idealism” — has
作者: nonradioactive    時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 21:43
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69044-1of substance into question. His characterization of substance as a “something-I-know-not-what” that we merely suppose to underly the manifest qualities of things led Berkeley, it is claimed, to take the next step, deny that the notion of matter has any meaning at all, and in that way eliminate mater
作者: Overdose    時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:52

作者: 晚來(lái)的提名    時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 05:11
Comparative Communication Researchs trees and rocks, sun and stars, consists of nothing but idea sequences. The oddity of the consequence, that we eat, drink and clothe ourselves in ideas, seems to have discredited this theory for the first two hundred years. But in this century, the theory has been applauded for its elegant economy
作者: SPASM    時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 07:07
https://doi.org/10.1007/b137626hat it is sufficient to establish his immaterialism. He is, he says, “content to put the whole” upon the issue of whether his reader can “conceive it possible for one extended moveable substance, or in general, for any one idea or any thing like an idea, to exist otherwise than in a mind perceiving
作者: Indicative    時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 11:44

作者: 腐敗    時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 18:10
Demographic Profile of Syrians in Belgiumhas argued that Berkeley hardly cared whether God maintains the continuity of the tree in the quad by perceiving it when we do not. In particular, the famous argument which purports to deduce God’s existence from the continuous existence of sensible things is represented by Bennett as no more than a
作者: 拍下盜公款    時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 21:41
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48044-1tient with the . too much apologetics and too little philosophy. There is one apparent exception. The fourth dialogue, ‘The Truth of Theism,’ contains a proof of God’s existence. But on a closer look many have found an unexciting version of the design argument, a version easily slain by Hume. T. E.
作者: 血友病    時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 02:01
Comparative Development Studieso believe in such a thing. For Berkeley himself this was by no means the most important argument. In fact, it is not fully developed in the ., but only in sections 18-20 of the .. The reason for the secondary role accorded this argument by Berkeley is indicated by the opening sentence of section 18:
作者: 農(nóng)學(xué)    時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 04:32

作者: anagen    時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 08:32

作者: Recessive    時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 12:34
New Visions: The Future Global Ordereley’s name evokes sometimes a vague image — “there was a bishop” — or the trinity’ of “Locke, Berkeley, and Hume.” Often you will find merely misunderstanding, but more frequently there is great ignorance. Some typical elements of the story are these: the first planned translation of the . in Germa
作者: 過(guò)濾    時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 17:57
Robyn Munford,Jackie Sanders,Bruce Madenhe theses presented and the arguments marshalled in their support is, for these sections, no easy task. Sections 48 and 49 are especially hard to interpret. Since this part of . is very important for Berkeley’s presentation of his new philosophical account of vision, a special effort to make sense of these sections seems warranted.
作者: 健談    時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 21:30

作者: 只有    時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 02:05

作者: overwrought    時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 04:09





歡迎光臨 派博傳思國(guó)際中心 (http://www.pjsxioz.cn/) Powered by Discuz! X3.5
平塘县| 黔江区| 辰溪县| 磐石市| 八宿县| 乐都县| 新郑市| 西峡县| 龙山县| 集安市| 富平县| 玛曲县| 周至县| 揭东县| 马公市| 昌乐县| 富裕县| 大田县| 金昌市| 周至县| 上高县| 长治县| 榆林市| 博爱县| 道真| 封丘县| 临江市| 安仁县| 惠安县| 冷水江市| 合江县| 香河县| 灯塔市| 安仁县| 芦山县| 四川省| 博湖县| 库伦旗| 玉环县| 怀安县| 海兴县|