標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer; Mark Atten Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 Edmu [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: 柳條筐 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 19:45
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer影響因子(影響力)
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer被引頻次
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer年度引用
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer年度引用學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer讀者反饋
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 偽造者 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 20:42
A Note on Leibniz’s Argument Against Infinite WholesThe refutation of this argument by Russell and others is equally well known. In this note, I argue (against positions recently defended by Arthur, Breger, and Brown) for the following three claims: (1) Leibniz himself had all the means to devise and accept this refutation; (2) This refutation does n作者: 談判 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:38
Monads and Sets: On G?del, Leibniz, and the Reflection Principle the mathematical and philosophical background to G?del’s argument, reconstruct the proposed analogy in detail, and argue that it has no justificatory force. The paper also provides further support for G?del’s idea that the monadology needs to be reconstructed phenomenologically, by showing that the作者: faucet 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 07:49
G?del’s Dialectica Interpretation and Leibnizd but in which one immediately notices the longhand name ‘Leibniz’. When transcribed and put into context, the note allows one to show that Leibniz was a source of inspiration for G?del’s revision of the Dialectica Interpretation.作者: 漫步 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 09:46 作者: 嘴唇可修剪 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 13:14 作者: 嘴唇可修剪 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 17:37 作者: 不可接觸 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 22:24 作者: Mortal 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 01:41
G?del and Intuitionismn G?del’s technical work. Then it is argued that the closest rapprochement of G?del to intuitionism is seen in the development of the Dialectica Interpretation, during which he came to accept the notion of computable functional of finite type as primitive. It is shown that G?del already thought of t作者: 致詞 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 07:43
Construction and Constitution in Mathematicsect coincide. Various objections to Brouwer’s intuitionism that have been raised in recent phenomenological literature (by Hill, Rosado Haddock, and Tieszen) are addressed. Then I present objections to G?del’s project of founding classical mathematics on transcendental phenomenology. The problem for作者: Expertise 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 11:44 作者: 男生戴手銬 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 17:51 作者: progestin 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 21:02
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26114-5ot presuppose the consistency of Cantorian set theory; (3) This refutation does not cast doubt on the part-whole axiom. Hence, should there be an obstacle to G?del’s wish to integrate Cantorian set theory within Leibniz’ philosophy, it will not be this famous argument of Leibniz’.作者: prostatitis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:58
About the Collective Forgiveness, that project lies not so much in Husserl’s insistence on the spontaneous character of the constitution of mathematical objects, or in his refusal to allow an appeal to higher minds, as in the combination of these two attitudes.作者: 不怕任性 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 05:38 作者: Afflict 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 07:03
2214-9775 phenomenology and challenges recent interpretations.Includes.This volume tackles G?del‘s two-stage project of first using Husserl‘s transcendental phenomenology to reconstruct and develop Leibniz‘ monadology, and then founding classical mathematics on the metaphysics thus obtained. The author analys作者: 煞費(fèi)苦心 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 13:57
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137331274 force. The paper also provides further support for G?del’s idea that the monadology needs to be reconstructed phenomenologically, by showing that the unsupplemented monadology is not able to found mathematics directly.作者: 抓住他投降 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 15:02
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84997-9nd (2) This explains G?del’s specific turn to Husserl’s transcendental idealism as opposed to the realism of the earlier Logical Investigations. We then give three examples of concrete influence from Husserl on G?del’s writings.作者: Antarctic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 21:44 作者: strain 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 01:25 作者: 脆弱吧 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 06:45
A Note on Leibniz’s Argument Against Infinite Wholesot presuppose the consistency of Cantorian set theory; (3) This refutation does not cast doubt on the part-whole axiom. Hence, should there be an obstacle to G?del’s wish to integrate Cantorian set theory within Leibniz’ philosophy, it will not be this famous argument of Leibniz’.作者: 我說(shuō)不重要 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 09:09
Construction and Constitution in Mathematics that project lies not so much in Husserl’s insistence on the spontaneous character of the constitution of mathematical objects, or in his refusal to allow an appeal to higher minds, as in the combination of these two attitudes.作者: originality 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 14:41
Craig Stubblebine,David N. Kennardology from about 1959 to the end of his life, the religious component in phenomenology, and the pragmatic value of Husserl’s and G?del’s historical turns in philosophy. Finally, an overview is provided of the essays that follow.作者: 厭倦嗎你 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 19:09
Introduction and Research Focus,d but in which one immediately notices the longhand name ‘Leibniz’. When transcribed and put into context, the note allows one to show that Leibniz was a source of inspiration for G?del’s revision of the Dialectica Interpretation.作者: 不愿 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 22:48 作者: 社團(tuán) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 03:43
Harald A. Posch,Christina Forsters phenomenology to find the foundations of mathematics. In G?del’s archive there are two draft letters that shed some further light on the exact strategy that he formulated for himself in the early 1960s. Transcriptions of these letters are presented, together with some comments.作者: 杠桿 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 04:42 作者: 夾克怕包裹 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 10:17
Introduction,ology from about 1959 to the end of his life, the religious component in phenomenology, and the pragmatic value of Husserl’s and G?del’s historical turns in philosophy. Finally, an overview is provided of the essays that follow.作者: comely 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 12:59
G?del’s Dialectica Interpretation and Leibnizd but in which one immediately notices the longhand name ‘Leibniz’. When transcribed and put into context, the note allows one to show that Leibniz was a source of inspiration for G?del’s revision of the Dialectica Interpretation.作者: 共同給與 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 20:18
G?del, Mathematics, and Possible Worlds that Hintikka is wrong about what G?del believed, and that, moreover, there exists a phenomenological unification of G?del’s Platonism and possible worlds theory. This text was written for a special issue of . on the philosophy of Nicolai Hartmann, which explains the two introductory paragraphs.作者: 吵鬧 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 23:09
Two Draft Letters from G?del on Self-Knowledge of Reasons phenomenology to find the foundations of mathematics. In G?del’s archive there are two draft letters that shed some further light on the exact strategy that he formulated for himself in the early 1960s. Transcriptions of these letters are presented, together with some comments.作者: Extricate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 03:42 作者: fibula 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:59 作者: 黃瓜 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 10:16 作者: 誘拐 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 14:24
The Costs of Coalition: The Italian AnomalyThis is an introduction to the phenomenology of mathematics, written for phenomenologists.作者: Lobotomy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 20:00
Functional integrals in quantum theory,We compare G?del’s and Brouwer’s explorations of mysticism and its relation to mathematics.作者: 一致性 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 23:23 作者: 下邊深陷 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 04:46
Mysticism and Mathematics: Brouwer, G?del, and the Common Core ThesisWe compare G?del’s and Brouwer’s explorations of mysticism and its relation to mathematics.作者: 符合國(guó)情 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 09:23 作者: Conduit 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 12:45
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26114-5The refutation of this argument by Russell and others is equally well known. In this note, I argue (against positions recently defended by Arthur, Breger, and Brown) for the following three claims: (1) Leibniz himself had all the means to devise and accept this refutation; (2) This refutation does n作者: pacific 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 15:04
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137331274 the mathematical and philosophical background to G?del’s argument, reconstruct the proposed analogy in detail, and argue that it has no justificatory force. The paper also provides further support for G?del’s idea that the monadology needs to be reconstructed phenomenologically, by showing that the作者: Melanocytes 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 20:20
Introduction and Research Focus,d but in which one immediately notices the longhand name ‘Leibniz’. When transcribed and put into context, the note allows one to show that Leibniz was a source of inspiration for G?del’s revision of the Dialectica Interpretation.作者: animated 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 23:33 作者: 含沙射影 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 04:34
Francesca Tesser,Charles R. Doering that Hintikka is wrong about what G?del believed, and that, moreover, there exists a phenomenological unification of G?del’s Platonism and possible worlds theory. This text was written for a special issue of . on the philosophy of Nicolai Hartmann, which explains the two introductory paragraphs.作者: 物種起源 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 11:18 作者: 江湖郎中 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 12:05
Collective Education in the Kibbutzs text was originally written in French and published in a special issue on logic of ., the French edition of .. This accounts for its introductory character and the absence of references and footnotes. The translation and slight revision are my own.作者: Resection 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 15:33
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8878-4n G?del’s technical work. Then it is argued that the closest rapprochement of G?del to intuitionism is seen in the development of the Dialectica Interpretation, during which he came to accept the notion of computable functional of finite type as primitive. It is shown that G?del already thought of t作者: DEI 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 21:05 作者: 使入迷 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 00:33
978-3-319-37657-8Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015作者: 臆斷 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 05:10 作者: overhaul 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 10:48
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10031-9Edmund Husserl; Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz; Kurt G?del; L; E; J; Brouwer; Platonism; intuitionism; monado
