派博傳思國際中心

標題: Titlebook: Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity; Joseph Andrew Bjelde,David Merry,Christopher Roser Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 Arg [打印本頁]

作者: 可怖    時間: 2025-3-21 17:49
書目名稱Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity被引頻次




書目名稱Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity年度引用




書目名稱Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity讀者反饋




書目名稱Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity讀者反饋學(xué)科排名





作者: Gorilla    時間: 2025-3-21 21:14
,Seneca’s Argumentation and Moral Intuitionism,Walter Sinnott-Armstrong argues that moral disagreement and widespread moral bias pose a serious problem for moral intuitionism. Seneca’s view that we just recognise the good could be criticised using a similar argument. His approach to argumentation offers a way out, one that may serve as a model for a revisionary intuitionism.
作者: 口音在加重    時間: 2025-3-22 04:05

作者: glamor    時間: 2025-3-22 08:09
Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity978-3-030-70817-7Series ISSN 1566-7650 Series E-ISSN 2215-1907
作者: Heart-Attack    時間: 2025-3-22 11:47
Britain and the Origins of the Cold Wareek tradition. This chapter focuses on the central section of his poem (fr. 8 DK) and examines the form of its argumentation: its use of indirect proof, the articulation of its reasoning, and the role necessity plays in it.
作者: 確定    時間: 2025-3-22 13:39

作者: 確定    時間: 2025-3-22 21:04

作者: 擴張    時間: 2025-3-22 21:51

作者: In-Situ    時間: 2025-3-23 01:38
,Platonic βραχυλογ?α and Aristotle on Say-What-You-Believe,d(s) and/or therapeutic aims from those of sophistic and eristic questioners. The treatment of SWYB in Aristotle’s . and . (.), however, challenges the notion that SWYB would have distinguished Socrates in the eyes of Plato’s earliest readers.
作者: Institution    時間: 2025-3-23 07:42

作者: 親密    時間: 2025-3-23 12:14
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70817-7Argumentation Ancient Philosophy; Ancient Rhetoric; Ancient Logic; Dialectic Ancient Philosophy; Rhetori
作者: Magnificent    時間: 2025-3-23 17:38
Joseph Andrew Bjelde,David Merry,Christopher RoserCovers a broad range of ancient perspectives on argumentation.Combines approaches from argumentation theory and history of philosophy.Is an excellent resource on how ancient thinkers argue and think a
作者: 自傳    時間: 2025-3-23 18:05
Argumentation Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/315297.jpg
作者: 展覽    時間: 2025-3-24 00:13

作者: uveitis    時間: 2025-3-24 05:15

作者: NOMAD    時間: 2025-3-24 08:24
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49532-3 instructing us—I turn to the historical Gorgias. The ‘Encomium of Helen’ ascribes to . (speech) virtually all-powerful capacities for persuasion, seduction, and even bewitchment. Here Gorgias (seemingly) celebrates the very things Plato rejects. Yet in the ‘Defense of Palamedes’ considerable anxiet
作者: 連系    時間: 2025-3-24 11:28
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65640-9bouts is then given and their meaning explained. The transition from oral to written arguments is briefly examined, leading to the formulation of a delimitation problem in Plato’s dialogues, as he inserted dialectical arguments within ordinary dialogue contexts, turning them into discussions where o
作者: Notorious    時間: 2025-3-24 17:14
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780312299613e clear: the dialectical use of arguments is epistemically valuable, while the rhetorical use is epistemically deficient. What is less clear, however, is how Plato justifies this sharp contrast. In this paper, I consider seven different ways scholarship has tried to answer this question. I argue tha
作者: Spirometry    時間: 2025-3-24 21:55

作者: 妨礙    時間: 2025-3-25 02:59
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70246-5at the success of the Socratic inquiry depends on the character of his interlocutors and their sense of what is shameful or not.?To read the . is to inquire whether Socrates’ refutations have demonstrated anything. Although?there is no definition of justice, happiness or the art of rhetoric, the dia
作者: CODA    時間: 2025-3-25 05:13
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137013224engagement recognizes a positive value to rhetoric as a necessary tool for leading people to justice. The paper explores rhetoric’s relation to . (rather than Socratic) dialectic through an examination of its role in late dialogues where the method of dialectic is most pronounced.
作者: Obstreperous    時間: 2025-3-25 08:34
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3052-0 account of Plato’s own view of .. In this paper, I refute Richard Robinson’s claim that Plato had no awareness of ., arguing that the “method of collection” serves as Plato’s theory of dialectical induction. Using the evidence of both the . and the ., I maintain that the abstraction characteristic
作者: 存心    時間: 2025-3-25 14:08

作者: 僵硬    時間: 2025-3-25 18:26

作者: 大暴雨    時間: 2025-3-25 20:32
Complications of Cold Injuries, definable supplementary characteristics that lie outside the core structure. Some current argumentation tools used in artificial intelligence and multi-agent systems are applied to the task of extending the core formal model to include the supplementary characteristics. Using these tools it is expl
作者: 滴注    時間: 2025-3-26 00:29
Gorgias and the Weakness of ,ies about whether . actually does possess such (persuasive) strength are voiced: the weakness, not the power, of . comes to occupy center stage. Gorgias’ own views thus are likely more complex than Plato allows.
作者: 集合    時間: 2025-3-26 04:58

作者: defeatist    時間: 2025-3-26 11:09

作者: 戲服    時間: 2025-3-26 15:37
,Rhetoric, Dialectic and Shame in Plato’s ,nquire whether Socrates’ refutations have demonstrated anything. Although?there is no definition of justice, happiness or the art of rhetoric, the dialogue nevertheless?shows that justice and trustworthiness concern both the practitioners of rhetoric and those of dialectic.
作者: Insatiable    時間: 2025-3-26 19:04
Was Aristotle a Virtue Argumentation Theorist?,being a modern revival of Aristotle’s ethics. Aristotle is also, of course, the father of Western logic and argumentation. This paper asks to what degree Aristotle may thereby be claimed as a forefather by VTA.
作者: 逗留    時間: 2025-3-26 21:11
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49532-3ies about whether . actually does possess such (persuasive) strength are voiced: the weakness, not the power, of . comes to occupy center stage. Gorgias’ own views thus are likely more complex than Plato allows.
作者: ethnology    時間: 2025-3-27 02:49
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3052-0of collection may be ‘purified’ of its empirical origins in its dialectical application to the inquiry into forms. In addition to providing a unifying thread from Socratic to Platonic and, finally, Aristotelian ., this view also offers evidence for the consistency of dialectical methodology within the dialogues
作者: nitric-oxide    時間: 2025-3-27 07:33
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61548-6oxa play at least a co-starring role. But in the third section, I argue that endoxa don’t play that co-starring role, by arguing for a deflationary account of what endoxa are. For that reason, the third view emerges as the most plausible; but the third view is, I’ll suggest, Platonic.
作者: exclamation    時間: 2025-3-27 13:15

作者: PANIC    時間: 2025-3-27 15:00

作者: Armada    時間: 2025-3-27 20:43
Complications of Cold Injuries,s such as argumentation schemes, types of dialogue, critical questions and a dialectical concept of burden of proof. Disputed issues on how the . fits the standard dialogue typology are discussed, and it is concluded that it fits best into a type of dialogue called examination dialogue that is closely related to persuasion dialogue.
作者: 事先無準備    時間: 2025-3-28 00:36
Argumentation and Persuasion in Classical Chinese Literature,und against which such techniques developed among so called “wandering persuaders” (.), who were travelling from court to court to offer their services as political advisors and diplomats to the local rulers of the time.
作者: 最低點    時間: 2025-3-28 04:05

作者: 左右連貫    時間: 2025-3-28 07:45

作者: overreach    時間: 2025-3-28 13:38
1566-7650 excellent resource on how ancient thinkers argue and think a.This book provides a collection of essays representing the state of the art in the?research into argumentation in classical antiquity. It contains essays from leading and up and coming scholars on figures as diverse as Parmenides, Gorgias,
作者: Reclaim    時間: 2025-3-28 16:42

作者: Condyle    時間: 2025-3-28 19:31
The Soviet and American Initiatives, 1945,being a modern revival of Aristotle’s ethics. Aristotle is also, of course, the father of Western logic and argumentation. This paper asks to what degree Aristotle may thereby be claimed as a forefather by VTA.
作者: overwrought    時間: 2025-3-29 00:51

作者: 占線    時間: 2025-3-29 05:53
Book 2021says from leading and up and coming scholars on figures as diverse as Parmenides, Gorgias, Seneca, and Classical Chinese "wandering persuaders."?.The book includes contributions from specialists in the history of philosophy as well as specialists in contemporary argumentation theory, and stimulates
作者: hypotension    時間: 2025-3-29 10:15

作者: JOT    時間: 2025-3-29 12:13
1566-7650 ing an engagement with a broader range of historical figures, and closer collaboration between contemporary concerns and the history of philosophy..978-3-030-70819-1978-3-030-70817-7Series ISSN 1566-7650 Series E-ISSN 2215-1907
作者: 公理    時間: 2025-3-29 17:17

作者: 樹上結(jié)蜜糖    時間: 2025-3-29 21:32

作者: Hyperlipidemia    時間: 2025-3-30 01:27

作者: pacifist    時間: 2025-3-30 06:37

作者: incarcerate    時間: 2025-3-30 10:08

作者: Crepitus    時間: 2025-3-30 15:07

作者: 呼吸    時間: 2025-3-30 20:30





歡迎光臨 派博傳思國際中心 (http://www.pjsxioz.cn/) Powered by Discuz! X3.5
洪雅县| 孝昌县| 诸城市| 油尖旺区| 阳朔县| 应用必备| 阳曲县| 广德县| 双流县| 盈江县| 津南区| 会泽县| 富顺县| 海盐县| 浦县| 鹤峰县| 邹城市| 寻乌县| 平阳县| 鸡泽县| 车险| 新乡县| 香港| 满洲里市| 县级市| 龙口市| 沙湾县| 嘉鱼县| 库车县| 许昌县| 陆良县| 抚松县| 兴仁县| 永和县| 安顺市| 阜新| 依安县| 汝城县| 湄潭县| 康平县| 上高县|