標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Ernest Sosa; Targeting His Philos Amrei Bahr,Markus Seidel Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licen [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: aspirant 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 17:27
書目名稱Ernest Sosa影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Ernest Sosa影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Ernest Sosa網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Ernest Sosa網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Ernest Sosa被引頻次
書目名稱Ernest Sosa被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Ernest Sosa年度引用
書目名稱Ernest Sosa年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Ernest Sosa讀者反饋
書目名稱Ernest Sosa讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: Insatiable 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 22:16 作者: 多產(chǎn)子 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 02:19
Book 2016 50 years. Ernest Sosa, one of the most distinguished contemporary philosophers, is best known for his ground-breaking work in epistemology, and has also contributed greatly to metaphysics, metaphilosophy and philosophy of language..This book, resulting from the 18th Münster Lectures in Philosophy, 作者: figure 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 07:08
Replies,itical teams’ focused attention. I am very pleased and grateful for the intense attention and challenge to my views, and for the excellent comments. I will do my best to respond with some helpful discussion.作者: 商品 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 10:38 作者: fatty-streak 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 13:01 作者: fatty-streak 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 18:11
Reg G. Willson,Steven A. Shaferher and, if so, how the two branches can be balanced out within the architecture of Sosa’s theory of knowledge. And second (in Sect. .), we offer and outline a more comprehensive account that solves not just the problems formulated at the outset, but also a number of problems identified along the way.作者: 大雨 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:54 作者: profligate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 01:34
Putting Testimony in Its Place,her and, if so, how the two branches can be balanced out within the architecture of Sosa’s theory of knowledge. And second (in Sect. .), we offer and outline a more comprehensive account that solves not just the problems formulated at the outset, but also a number of problems identified along the way.作者: 情愛 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 08:42 作者: neutralize 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:03 作者: FELON 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 17:03 作者: 同位素 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 18:02 作者: 強(qiáng)制令 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 01:37
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-20367-4epistemic luck”. It must derive from competence rather than luck. Knowledge, then, is a judgment or belief that aims at truth and attains accuracy not by luck but through the agent’s cognitive adroitness, so that the attainment is apt. A higher grade of knowledge then requires that the agent attain 作者: CRP743 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 05:57 作者: 不能強(qiáng)迫我 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 09:47 作者: 語源學(xué) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 12:38
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04688-0ns are incapable of applying even simple logical rules. Ernest Sosa argues that their argument rests on a faulty concept of rationality. On Sosa’s view, rationality cannot be defined in terms of adherence to rules of logic and probability; instead, he holds rationality to be both multidimensional an作者: cylinder 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 15:58
Accuracy, speed and power relation,fic discipline. Recently, the X-Phi movement has added another twist to the discussion about philosophy’s scientific status by challenging philosophy’s reliance on intuitions in the context of philosophical reasoning. Ernest Sosa has prominently responded to some of the challenges raised by X-Phi in作者: 要控制 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 19:29 作者: Indent 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 01:17 作者: osculate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 05:44
L. A. Marjina,M. I. Nechushkin,V. V. Serovaconcerning the relationship of language, mind and world belongs to the most important questions of theoretical philosophy. In our paper, we take a closer look at Sosa’s modified Fregean proposal in order to find out if it provides a satisfactory answer to the modified Wittgensteinian question. We pr作者: COKE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 08:22 作者: 樣式 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 14:44
Amrei Bahr,Markus SeidelPresents the work of one of the most distinguished contemporary philosophers.Contains Sosa‘s original Münster Lecture on his most recent work.Presents critical papers and original responses from Sosa.作者: 注入 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 16:29
Münster Lectures in Philosophyhttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/314793.jpg作者: 受傷 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 21:27 作者: 笨重 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 01:48 作者: 發(fā)炎 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 04:25 作者: 戲服 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 10:50
Book 2016 of inquiry include his view on empirical challenges to human rationality, his defense of the scientific status of philosophy, ?his concept of causality as considered against the background of the current debate, his suggestion of a middle-way between existential relativism and absolutism and his ex作者: 倔強(qiáng)一點(diǎn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 13:05
Stars: Attributes, Energetics, End Stages,h (subjective) confidence in our competences to accompany their (objective) reliability. As a solution for these three problems we suggest to acknowledge that the manifestation of reflective competences (especially for coherence checking) is a constitutive part of the second-order competence manifes作者: 羊欄 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:40
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04688-0espite being implicitly indexical, rationality nevertheless rests on some absolute dimension(s), Sosa must inform us on how it is possible for us to determine the truth value of claims that attribute rationality to agents. (3) Lastly, we invoke the distinction between irrationality and arationality 作者: Defiance 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 21:40
Accuracy, speed and power relation,e argument and present our reasons for rejecting Sosa’s way of assailing it. Secondly, we present an outline of the Missing Consensus Argument, give a reconstruction of Sosa’s reply and substantiate our doubts as to the plausibility of the reply. Thirdly, we suggest routes to the rehabilitation of p作者: armistice 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 04:44
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21714-2losion of reality. (c) Sosa is forced to accept that disputants really disagree in existential disputes (although faultlessly). (d) We offer an even simpler alternative option to reconcile the realist and the relativist intuitions by clarifying what is meant by “conceptual relativism”, without argui作者: 縮影 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 07:34 作者: 假設(shè) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 10:45
Man the Irrational Animal?,espite being implicitly indexical, rationality nevertheless rests on some absolute dimension(s), Sosa must inform us on how it is possible for us to determine the truth value of claims that attribute rationality to agents. (3) Lastly, we invoke the distinction between irrationality and arationality 作者: 緩和 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 16:20 作者: 剝皮 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 19:57
A Snowslide of Entities,losion of reality. (c) Sosa is forced to accept that disputants really disagree in existential disputes (although faultlessly). (d) We offer an even simpler alternative option to reconcile the realist and the relativist intuitions by clarifying what is meant by “conceptual relativism”, without argui作者: ANT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 23:28
Knowledge in Action,epistemic luck”. It must derive from competence rather than luck. Knowledge, then, is a judgment or belief that aims at truth and attains accuracy not by luck but through the agent’s cognitive adroitness, so that the attainment is apt. A higher grade of knowledge then requires that the agent attain 作者: 送秋波 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 02:12
,Manifesting One’s Competences Successfully and Aptly: Enough to Beat the Skeptic?,his account as detailed in his book .. Regarding Sosa’s general theory of apt agency, we start with discussing the temporal relation between performances and the second-order risk evaluations that are necessary to make them fully apt. This leads us to the observation that evaluations of aptness are 作者: 潛移默化 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 07:56 作者: CRUMB 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 13:53 作者: 損壞 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 14:34
Yes There Can! Rehabilitating Philosophy as a Scientific Discipline,fic discipline. Recently, the X-Phi movement has added another twist to the discussion about philosophy’s scientific status by challenging philosophy’s reliance on intuitions in the context of philosophical reasoning. Ernest Sosa has prominently responded to some of the challenges raised by X-Phi in作者: NIB 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 21:00 作者: 反復(fù)拉緊 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 00:11
A Snowslide of Entities,e further clarification. First, we distinguish three alternative readings of Sosa’s account – the indexicalist, the homonymist and the (proper) relativist reading – and argue that they differ with respect to two crucial points: (a) they lead to different analyses of the lack of disagreement in exist作者: 寬容 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 05:17
What Makes My Thought About X a Thought About ,?,concerning the relationship of language, mind and world belongs to the most important questions of theoretical philosophy. In our paper, we take a closer look at Sosa’s modified Fregean proposal in order to find out if it provides a satisfactory answer to the modified Wittgensteinian question. We pr作者: Exhilarate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 11:18
Replies,earlier years, and I very much appreciated the opportunity to think about them again and to try to put them in perspective with the stimulus of the critical teams’ focused attention. I am very pleased and grateful for the intense attention and challenge to my views, and for the excellent comments. I作者: novelty 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 12:10 作者: 有說服力 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 17:26
