標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Erhard Scheibe‘s Structuralism; Roots and Prospects Johannes Mierau Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclus [打印本頁] 作者: 烤問 時間: 2025-3-21 18:59
書目名稱Erhard Scheibe‘s Structuralism影響因子(影響力)
作者: 動物 時間: 2025-3-21 23:58
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33570-9r, I retrace a purely syntactic and a semantic phase in the course of its development, and discuss which of its many objections are justified. Despite the untenability of this view, its discussion is an important step to understand the differences to the syntactic view of G. Ludwig and the syntactic-semantic hybrid view of E. Scheibe.作者: Trigger-Point 時間: 2025-3-22 03:17
The Received View of Theories,r, I retrace a purely syntactic and a semantic phase in the course of its development, and discuss which of its many objections are justified. Despite the untenability of this view, its discussion is an important step to understand the differences to the syntactic view of G. Ludwig and the syntactic-semantic hybrid view of E. Scheibe.作者: 窒息 時間: 2025-3-22 06:58 作者: Encephalitis 時間: 2025-3-22 12:36 作者: 刺耳 時間: 2025-3-22 15:51
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33570-9r, I retrace a purely syntactic and a semantic phase in the course of its development, and discuss which of its many objections are justified. Despite the untenability of this view, its discussion is an important step to understand the differences to the syntactic view of G. Ludwig and the syntactic作者: 刺耳 時間: 2025-3-22 17:38
Gastrointestinal Uses of Botulinum Toxinimportantly ‘structure’ and ‘model’. I compare different ways of defining ‘structure’ (in model theory, as indexed structures, by Bourbakian species of structures and an analogue in category theory) with regard to their claimed language-independence and discuss difficulties that arise when they are 作者: Keshan-disease 時間: 2025-3-22 21:47 作者: debunk 時間: 2025-3-23 05:27
Dhanya Vijayakumar,Joseph Jankovicrs. It strongly builds on Ludwig’s approach, but it also incorporates Suppes’s central idea to axiomatise theories by set-theoretical predicates. In the second part, I thoroughly examine the formal concept for imprecision ‘a(chǎn)dmissible blurs’ that has been proposed by Ludwig and adopted by the Munich 作者: 報復(fù) 時間: 2025-3-23 06:29 作者: 閑聊 時間: 2025-3-23 11:31
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-34095-9expose the traits that distinguish it from competing accounts, especially from the formally similar approach of Ludwig, while the second part provides an outlook on the merits of each of the presented approaches and evaluates their respective utility for issues of the philosophy of physics, especial作者: Resection 時間: 2025-3-23 14:45
978-3-031-25349-2The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl作者: 少量 時間: 2025-3-23 20:38 作者: 標(biāo)準(zhǔn) 時間: 2025-3-23 23:44 作者: 晚來的提名 時間: 2025-3-24 02:36
Fundamental Theories of Physicshttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/314567.jpg作者: Generic-Drug 時間: 2025-3-24 08:53
Introduction,hin the range of views in general philosophy of science. Since the labels for the main positions ‘Syntactic View’, ‘Semantic View’ and ‘Structural View’, which will be the topics of the subsequent chapters, are used very differently, I provide an overview on the various interpretations and explain s作者: fixed-joint 時間: 2025-3-24 12:48
The Received View of Theories,r, I retrace a purely syntactic and a semantic phase in the course of its development, and discuss which of its many objections are justified. Despite the untenability of this view, its discussion is an important step to understand the differences to the syntactic view of G. Ludwig and the syntactic作者: 溫和女人 時間: 2025-3-24 15:45 作者: 打算 時間: 2025-3-24 19:03 作者: 生銹 時間: 2025-3-25 01:53 作者: Pert敏捷 時間: 2025-3-25 04:14
,On Scheibe’s Theory of Reduction, on reduction suffers, I claim, from a failure to pay attention to detailed features of the respective theories and their interrelations. Those cases for which something like the philosophers’ (Nagelian or neo-Nagelian) models of reduction will work are actually quite special. The vast majority of p作者: indemnify 時間: 2025-3-25 09:39
Conclusion: Views on Scientific Theories,expose the traits that distinguish it from competing accounts, especially from the formally similar approach of Ludwig, while the second part provides an outlook on the merits of each of the presented approaches and evaluates their respective utility for issues of the philosophy of physics, especial作者: 截斷 時間: 2025-3-25 14:18
From Structures to Statements,ferent formalisms. I argue that Ludwig’s conception successfully overcomes the criticism that have been raised against both approaches, but that the strong empiricist foundation of Ludwig’s approach impedes a wide-spread application in philosophy of science.作者: agglomerate 時間: 2025-3-25 18:21 作者: amnesia 時間: 2025-3-25 21:58
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39312-0w’, which will be the topics of the subsequent chapters, are used very differently, I provide an overview on the various interpretations and explain some confusion that has been caused by these conceptual ambiguities.作者: mortgage 時間: 2025-3-26 02:46
Dhanya Vijayakumar,Joseph Jankoviche second part, I thoroughly examine the formal concept for imprecision ‘a(chǎn)dmissible blurs’ that has been proposed by Ludwig and adopted by the Munich Structuralists and Scheibe. As a result, I propose modifications to this formal tool that are necessary to achieve the objectives for which it was introduced.作者: 著名 時間: 2025-3-26 06:02 作者: 一致性 時間: 2025-3-26 10:31 作者: Subdue 時間: 2025-3-26 14:28
Book 2023and analyzing the related questions of reduction and emergence. Readers will appreciate the critical overview of the main positions in philosophy of science, examined with particular attention to their applicability to current problems of fundamental theories of physics.作者: Trypsin 時間: 2025-3-26 18:41 作者: 繁榮地區(qū) 時間: 2025-3-26 23:51
,Scheibe’s Hybrid Structuralism,he second part, I thoroughly examine the formal concept for imprecision ‘a(chǎn)dmissible blurs’ that has been proposed by Ludwig and adopted by the Munich Structuralists and Scheibe. As a result, I propose modifications to this formal tool that are necessary to achieve the objectives for which it was introduced.作者: 調(diào)味品 時間: 2025-3-27 05:03 作者: Affirm 時間: 2025-3-27 05:23
Conclusion: Views on Scientific Theories, an outlook on the merits of each of the presented approaches and evaluates their respective utility for issues of the philosophy of physics, especially with the topic of asymptotic reasoning in mind. In conclusion, I stress the central claims of this book:作者: 到婚嫁年齡 時間: 2025-3-27 13:10
Kat Kolaski M.D.,L. Andrew Koman M.D.ferent formalisms. I argue that Ludwig’s conception successfully overcomes the criticism that have been raised against both approaches, but that the strong empiricist foundation of Ludwig’s approach impedes a wide-spread application in philosophy of science.作者: STALL 時間: 2025-3-27 15:37
Gastrointestinal Uses of Botulinum Toxinn given for this choice. Furthermore, I outline the Semantic View on theories, Suppes’s axiomatization of theories by set-theoretical predicates and the Munich Structuralism, and discuss their limitations.作者: HARP 時間: 2025-3-27 21:26 作者: ELUC 時間: 2025-3-27 22:35
Book 2023precision into formal reconstructions of theories. The proposed measure of imprecision allows for a topological comparison of theories. Considering the ongoing debates on the nature of the thermodynamic limit in statistical mechanics, as well as on limit relations between classical and quantum mecha作者: 設(shè)想 時間: 2025-3-28 05:09 作者: 他姓手中拿著 時間: 2025-3-28 06:25
